As per BIP 141, if there is more than 1 pubkey that matches the witness
commitment structure, the one with the highest output index should be
chosen. This adds a sanity check that we are doing that, which will fail
if anyone trys to "optimise" GetWitnessCommitmentIndex() be returning
early.
e57980b473 [mempool] Remove NotifyEntryAdded and NotifyEntryRemoved callbacks (John Newbery)
2dd561f361 [validation] Remove pool member from ConnectTrace (John Newbery)
969b65f3f5 [validation] Remove NotifyEntryRemoved callback from ConnectTrace (John Newbery)
5613f9842b [validation] Remove conflictedTxs from PerBlockConnectTrace (John Newbery)
cdb893443c [validation interface] Remove vtxConflicted from BlockConnected (John Newbery)
1168394d75 [wallet] Notify conflicted transactions in TransactionRemovedFromMempool (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
These boost signals were added in #9371, before we had a `TransactionRemovedFromMempool` method in the validation interface. The `NotifyEntryAdded` callback was used by validation to build a vector of conflicted transactions when connecting a block, which the wallet was notified of in the `BlockConnected` CValidationInterface callback.
Now that we have a `TransactionRemovedFromMempool` callback, we can fire that signal directly from the mempool for conflicted transactions.
Note that #9371 was implemented to ensure `-walletnotify` events were fired for these conflicted transaction. We inadvertently stopped sending these notifications in #16624 (Sep 2019 commit 7e89994). We should probably fix that, but in a different PR.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Re-ACK e57980b
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK e57980b473, no code changes since previous review, but helpful new code comments have been added and the PR description is now more clear about where the old code came from
Tree-SHA512: 3bdbaf1ef2731e788462d4756e69c42a1efdcf168691ce1bbfdaa4b7b55ac3c5b1fd4ab7b90bcdec653703600501b4224d252cfc086aef28f9ce0da3b0563a69
This is safe because MilliSleep is never executed in a boost::thread,
the only type of thread that is interruptible.
* The RPC server uses std::thread
* The wallet is either executed in an RPC thread or the main thread
* bitcoin-cli, benchmarks and tests are only one thread (the main thread)
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i --regexp-extended -e 's/MilliSleep\((\S+)\);/UninterruptibleSleep(std::chrono::milliseconds{\1});/g' $(git grep -l MilliSleep)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
fa538813b1 scripted-diff: Replace ::mempool with m_node.mempool in tests (MarcoFalke)
8888ad02e2 test: Replace recursive lock with locking annotations (MarcoFalke)
fac07f2038 node: Add reference to mempool in NodeContext (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is the first step toward making the mempool a global that is not initialized before main.
#### Motivation
Currently the mempool is a global that is initialized before the `main` function. This is confusing and easy to get wrong. E.g. the mempool constructor queries state that has not been initialized, like randomness (fixed), or command line arguments (not an issue last time I checked). Also without having the chainstate (chain tip) initialized first, it doesn't make conceptually sense to have a mempool, since the mempool builds txs on top of the utxo set (chain tip).
Finally, in the future someone might want to run a consensus-only full node (`-nowallet -noblockfilter -no... -nomempool` command line options) that only verifies blocks and updates the utxo set.
This is conceptually the same change that has already been done for the connection manager `CConnman`.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK fa538813b1
ariard:
Tested ACK fa53881.
Tree-SHA512: 2c446a8a51476354aad7126c2b833500d36b24490caa94f847b2bdc622054de0dae28980f23e3d91b1b492dc32931656d98dbd019af9e4e58f2f8c5375aac694
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
# tx pool member access (mempool followed by dot)
sed --regexp-extended -i -e 's/(::)?\<mempool\>\.([a-zA-Z])/m_node.mempool->\2/g' $(git grep -l mempool ./src/test)
# plain global (mempool not preceeded by dot, but followed by comma)
sed --regexp-extended -i -e 's/([^\.])(::)?\<mempool\>,/\1*m_node.mempool,/g' $(git grep -l mempool ./src/test)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
36b68de5b2 Remove getBlockDepth method from Chain::interface (Antoine Riard)
b66c429c56 Remove locked_chain from GetDepthInMainChain and its callers (Antoine Riard)
0ff03871ad Use CWallet::m_last_block_processed_height in GetDepthInMainChain (Antoine Riard)
f77b1de16f Only return early from BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain if current tip is exact match (Antoine Riard)
769ff05e48 Refactor some importprunedfunds checks with guard clause (Antoine Riard)
5971d3848e Add block_height field in struct Confirmation (Antoine Riard)
9700fcb47f Replace CWalletTx::SetConf by Confirmation initialization list (Antoine Riard)
5aacc3eff1 Add m_last_block_processed_height field in CWallet (Antoine Riard)
10b4729e33 Pass block height in Chain::BlockConnected/Chain::BlockDisconnected (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
Work starter to remove Chain::Lock interface by adding m_last_block_processed_height in CWallet and m_block_height in CMerkleTx to avoid GetDepthInMainChain having to keep a lock . Once this one done, it should ease work to wipe out more cs_main locks from wallet code.
I think it's ready for a first round of review before to get further.
- `BlockUntilSyncedToCurrent` : restrain isPotentialTip to isTip because we want to be sure that wallet see BlockDisconnected callbacks if its height differs from the Chain one. It means during a reorg, an RPC could return before the BlockDisconnected callback had been triggered. This could cause a tx that had been included in the disconnected block to be displayed as confirmed, for example.
~~- `AbandonTransaction` : in case of conflicted tx (nIndex = -1), we set its m_block_height to the one of conflicting blocks, but if this height is superior to CWallet::m_last_block_processed_height, that means tx isn't conflicted anymore so we return 0 as tx is again unconfirmed~~ After #16624, we instead rely on Confirmation.
~~- `AddToWalletIfInvolvingMe`: in case of block disconnected, transactions are added to mempool again, so we need to replace old txn in `mapWallet` with a height set to zero so we remove check on block_hash.IsNull~~ Already done in #16624
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
@jkczyz you've ACKed an intermediate commit (github annoyingly orders commits in date order, not commit order). Did you mean to ACK the final commit in this branch (36b68de5b2).
jkczyz:
> @jkczyz you've ACKed an intermediate commit (github annoyingly orders commits in date order, not commit order). Did you mean to ACK the final commit in this branch ([36b68de](36b68de5b2)).
meshcollider:
utACK 36b68de5b2
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 36b68de5b2. Changes since last review: new jkczyz refactor importprunedfunds commit, changed BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChainChanges commit title and description, changed Confirmation struct field order and line-wrapped comment
jnewbery:
utACK 36b68de5b2
promag:
Code review ACK 36b68de5b2.
Tree-SHA512: 08b89a0bcc39f67c82a6cb6aee195e6a11697770c788ba737b90986b4893f44e90d1ab9ef87239ea3766508b7e24ea882b7199df41173ab27a3d000328c14644
To do so we update CValidationInterface::BlockDisconnect to take a
CBlockIndex pointing to the block being disconnected.
This new parameter will be use in the following commit to establish
wallet height.
fa0a731d00 test: Add RegTestingSetup to setup_common (MarcoFalke)
fa54b3e248 test: move-only ComputeFilter to src/test/lib/blockfilter (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The default chain for `TestingSetup` is the main chain. However, any test that wants to mine blocks on demand needs to switch to regtest. This is done manually and in-line right now.
Fix that by creating an explicit `RegTestingSetup` and use it where appropriate.
Also, add a move-only commit to move `ComputeFilter` into the newly created unit test library.
Both commits are part of #15845, but split up because they are useful on their own.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa0a731d00 -- diff looks correct
Tree-SHA512: 02b9765580b355ed8d1be555f8ae11fa6e3d575f5cb177bbdda0319378837e29de5555c126c477dc8a1e8a5be47335afdcff152cf2dea2fbdd1a988ddde3689b
fa2b083c3f [test] Add test to check mempool consistency in case of reorgs (MarcoFalke)
fabeb1f613 validation: Add missing mempool locks (MarcoFalke)
fa0c9dbf91 txpool: Make nTransactionsUpdated atomic (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Take the mempool read lock during reorgs, so that we don't accidentally read an inconsistent mempool.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK fa2b083c3f
ryanofsky:
utACK fa2b083c3f [EDIT: was ~e284e422e75189794e24fe482819d8b1407857c3~, from bad copy and paste]. Changes since last review: rebase after #15976, adding vTxHashes lock annotation, adding new commit dropping mempool lock for nTransactionsUpdated and making it atomic to avoid deadlock between mempool lock and g_best_block_mutex
Tree-SHA512: cfe7777993589087753e000e3736d79d320dca412383fb77b56bef8946a04049722bf888c11b6f722adf677165185c7e58b4a269f7c5fa25e84dda375f6c8a7d
Though at the moment ChainActive() simply references `g_chainstate.m_chain`,
doing this change now clears the way for multiple chainstate usage and allows
us to script the diff.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
git grep -l "chainActive" | grep -E '(h|cpp)$' | xargs sed -i '/chainActive =/b; /extern CChain& chainActive/b; s/\(::\)\{0,1\}chainActive/::ChainActive()/g'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
d2ce315fbf [docs] add release note for change to GBT (John Newbery)
0025c9eae4 [mining] segwit option must be set in GBT (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Calling getblocktemplate without the segwit rule specified is most
likely a client error, since it results in lower fees for the miner.
Prevent this client error by failing getblocktemplate if called without
the segwit rule specified.
Of the previous 1000 blocks (measured at block [551591 (hash 0x...173c811)](https://blockstream.info/block/000000000000000000173c811e79858808abc3216af607035973f002bef60a7a)), 991 included segwit transactions.
Tree-SHA512: 7933b073d72683c9ab9318db46a085ec19a56a14937945c73f783ac7656887619a86b74db0bdfcb8121df44f63a1d6a6fb19e98505b2a26a6a8a6e768e442fee
c84c2b8c92 tests: Test for expected return values when calling functions returning a success code (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Test for expected return values when calling functions returning a success code (instead of discarding the return values).
**Note to reviewers:** The following commands can be used to verify that the only text fragments added in this PR are `BOOST_CHECK(`, `!` and `)` :
```
$ git diff HEAD~1 | grep -E '^[\-][^\-]' | cut -b2- > before.txt
$ git diff HEAD~1 | grep -E '^[\+][^\+]' | cut -b2- > after.txt
$ cat after.txt | sed 's/BOOST_CHECK(//g' | sed 's/));/);/g' | tr -d '!' > after-sed.txt
$ diff -u before.txt after-sed.txt
$
```
Tree-SHA512: ff0863ef2046a2eda3c44e9c6b9aedfe167881f2fa58db29fef859416831233ef6502a3a11fd2322bc1a924db83df8d4a5c5879298007f2a7b085e2a7286af70
Calling getblocktemplate without the segwit rule specified is most
likely a client error, since it results in lower fees for the miner.
Prevent this client error by failing getblocktemplate if called without
the segwit rule specified.
This trivial change adds the "override" keyword to some methods of
subclasses meant to override interface methods. This ensures that any
future change to the interface' method signatures which are not correctly
mirrored in the subclass will break at compile time with a clear error message,
rather than fail at runtime (which is harder to debug).
After a recent bug discovered in callback ordering in MainSignals,
this test checks invariants in ordering of
BlockConnected / BlockDisconnected / UpdatedChainTip signals
