fa3967efdb test: Replace ARRAYLEN with C++11 ranged for loop (MarcoFalke)
fafc529053 test: Run AssetTest even if built --with-libs=no (MarcoFalke)
faf58ab139 ci: Add --with-libs=no to one ci config (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`script_assets_test` doesn't call libbitcoinconsensus, so it seems confusing to require it
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa3967efdb - looks ok to me.
Tree-SHA512: 8744fef64c5d7dc19a0ef4ae9b3df5b3f356253bf000f12723064794c5e50df071824d436059985f1112d94c1b530b65cbeb6b8435114a91b195480620eafc59
0be29000c0 rpc: update conf_target helps for correctness/consistency (Jon Atack)
778b9be406 wallet, rpc: fix send subtract_fee_from_outputs help (Jon Atack)
603c005083 wallet: add rpc send explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
dd341e602d wallet: add sendtoaddress/sendmany explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
44e7bfa603 wallet: add walletcreatefundedpsbt explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
6e1ea4273e test: refactor for walletcreatefundedpsbt fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
3ac7b0c6f1 wallet: fundrawtx fee rate coverage, fixup ParseConfirmTarget() (Jon Atack)
2d8eba8f84 wallet: combine redundant bumpfee invalid params and args tests (Jon Atack)
1697a40b6f wallet: improve bumpfee error/help, add explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
fc5721723d wallet: fix SetFeeEstimateMode() error message (Jon Atack)
052427eef1 wallet, bugfix: fix bumpfee with explicit fee rate modes (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #11413 providing a base to build on for #19543:
- bugfix for `bumpfee` raising a JSON error with explicit feerates, fixes issue #20219
- adds explicit feerate test coverage for `bumpfee`, `fundrawtransaction`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, `send`, `sendtoaddress`, and `sendmany`
- improves a few related RPC error messages and `ParseConfirmTarget()` / error message
- fixes/improves the explicit fee rate information in the 6 RPC helps, of which 2 were also missing `conf_target` sat/B units
This provides a spec and regression coverage for the potential next step of a universal `sat/vB` feerate argument (see #19543), as well as immediate coverage and minimum fixes for 0.21.
ACKs for top commit:
kallewoof:
Concept/Tested ACK 0be29000c0
meshcollider:
Code review + functional test run ACK 0be29000c0
Tree-SHA512: efd965003e991cba51d4504e2940f06ab3d742e34022e96a673606b44fad85596aa03a8c1809f06df7ebcf21a38e18a891e54392fe3d6fb4d120bbe4ea0cf5e0
2ead31fb1b [wallet] Return object from upgradewallet RPC (Sishir Giri)
Pull request description:
Change the return type of upgradewallet to be an object for future extensibility.
Also return any error string returned from the `UpgradeWallet()` function.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 2ead31fb1b
meshcollider:
Tested ACK 2ead31fb1b
Tree-SHA512: bcc7432d2f35093ec2463ea19e894fa885b698c0e8d8e4bd2f979bd4d722cbfed53ec589d6280968917893c64649dc9e40800b8d854273b0f9a1380f51afbdb1
6866259fab net: Hardcoded seeds update for 0.21 (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
36e875b4c5 contrib: Add new versions to makeseeds.py and update gitignore (RandyMcMillan)
Pull request description:
Stats:
```
IPv4 IPv6 Onion Pass
426728 59523 7900 Initial
426728 59523 7900 Skip entries with invalid address
426728 59523 7900 After removing duplicates
426727 59523 7900 Skip entries from suspicious hosts
123226 51785 7787 Enforce minimal number of blocks
121710 51322 7586 Require service bit 1
4706 1427 3749 Require minimum uptime
4124 1098 3681 Require a known and recent user agent
4033 1075 3681 Filter out hosts with multiple bitcoin ports
512 140 512 Look up ASNs and limit results per ASN and per net
```
I've credited RandyMcMillan for the first commit because of #20190.
There are at least enough onions this time! Number of IPv6 nodes that pass all the requirements seems similar to last time in #18506.
For the next major release we'll want TORv3 hardcoded peers as well. This makes no sense now as there are hardly any. But it'd make sense to think about how to collect them because they cannot come from the DNS seeds.
### Reviewing
```
2020-10-28 12:04:45 jnewbery wumpus: Do you have any suggestions for how to review #20237 ?
2020-10-28 12:28:37 wumpus jnewbery: previous PRs like it might be a guide there (#18506, #16999), e.g. people could try to repeat the last step in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tree/master/contrib/seeds#seeds and see if it ends up with the same .h file, you could also repeat the entire process but as the list of peers from the seeder will be different every time that will give a (slightly, hopefully)
2020-10-28 12:28:37 wumpus different output
2020-10-28 12:49:40 wumpus testing what part of the peers are connectable is also useful
2020-10-28 12:51:05 wumpus or to go deeper, whether most part of the nodes are 'good nodes' and not say spy nodes, but i don't know what means of testing
```
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 6866259fab
Tree-SHA512: 6b913ec92932de03304301a0cbf7b4a912ed09d890b019deeb449b8fa787c4994222368c6bf08b3c6e2bfa474442612e1c9de9327ec46ba59c37a5f38af50c75
Currently, the logic around whether we called CAddrMan::Connected() for
a peer is spread between verack processing (where we discard inbound
peers) and FinalizeNode (where we discard misbehaving and
block-relay-only peers). Consolidate that logic to a single place.
Also remove the CNode.fCurrentlyConnected bool, which is now
redundant. We can rely on CNode.fSuccessfullyConnected, since the two
bools were only ever flipped to true in the same place.
c2cf8a18c2 fuzz: Check for addrv1 compatibility before using addrv1 serializer on CService (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Check for addrv1 compatibility before using addrv1 serializer/deserializer on `CService`:
Before this patch:
```
$ src/test/fuzz/service_deserialize
service_deserialize: test/fuzz/deserialize.cpp:85:
void (anonymous namespace)::AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(const T &, const int) [T = CService]:
Assertion `Deserialize<T>(Serialize(obj, version)) == obj' failed.
```
After this patch:
```
$ src/test/fuzz/service_deserialize
…
```
Related change: #20247
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK c2cf8a18c2
Tree-SHA512: dba6ddc60e8ef621011d844281461f1741de08c4af1a2b7156c810af44306cef7ec582de5974752db02ca085cfd23da0296d70b694e59ee262589d829fa0626e
16d9bfc417 Avoid test-before-evict evictions of current peers (Suhas Daftuar)
e8b215a086 Refactor test for existing peer connection into own function (Suhas Daftuar)
4fe338ab3e Call CAddrMan::Good() on block-relay-only peer addresses (Suhas Daftuar)
daf5553126 Avoid calling CAddrMan::Connected() on block-relay-only peer addresses (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
This PR does two things:
* Block-relay-only interaction with addrman.
* Calling `CAddrMan::Connected()` on an address that was a block-relay-only peer causes the time we report in `addr` messages containing that peer to be updated; particularly now that we use anchor connections with a our block-relay-only peers, this risks leaking information about those peers. So, stop this.
* Avoiding calling `CAddrMan::Good()` on block-relay-only peer addresses causes the addrman logic around maintaining the new and tried table to be less good, and in particular makes it so that block-relay-only peer addresses are more likely to be evicted from the addrman (for no good reason I can think of). So, mark those addresses as good when we connect.
* Fix test-before-evict bug. There's a bug where if we get a collision in the tried table with an existing address that is one of our current peers, and the connection is long-lived enough, then `SelectTriedCollisions()` might return that existing peer address to us as a test-before-evict connection candidate. However, our logic for new outbound connections would later prevent us from actually making a connection; the result would be that when we get a collision with a long-lived current peer, that peer's address is likely to get evicted from the tried table. Fix this by checking to see if a test-before-evict candidate is a peer we're currently connected to, and if so, mark it as `Good()`.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 16d9bfc417
amitiuttarwar:
code review ACK 16d9bfc417
mzumsande:
Code-Review ACK 16d9bfc417.
jnewbery:
utACK 16d9bfc417
ariard:
Code Review ACK 16d9bfc.
jonatack:
Tested ACK 16d9bfc417
Tree-SHA512: 188ccb814e436937cbb91d29d73c316ce83f4b9c22f1cda56747f0949a093e10161ae724e87e4a2d85ac40f85f5f6b4e87e97d350a1ac44f80c57783f4423324
fa90ba36d3 Update assumed chain params (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
> Oh, by the way, the same procedure as last year, Miss Sophie?
> Same procedure as every year, James.
See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/release-process.md#before-branch-off
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK fa90ba36d3 per `git diff fa0c1b5 fa90ba3` and re-running getblockheader/getblockhash/getchaintxstats on the signet chain
dergoegge:
ACK fa90ba36d3 - mainnet and testnet data matches my node.
theStack:
re-ACK fa90ba36d3✔️
darosior:
re-ACK fa90ba36d3 for mainnet and testnet.
Tree-SHA512: 83044cc59d9fc873cb29f13008d00b54cb4bb4646c1ca53ab4f429e7333a32402becb888d3be117d390c1297c2f7d083f77ae12ac8633265edceb3cfefac087f
3d0556d410 Increase feature_taproot inactive test coverage (Pieter Wuille)
525cbd425e Only relay Taproot spends if next block has it active (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
There should be no change to mempool transaction behavior for witness v1 transactions as long as no activation is defined. Until that point, we should treat the consensus rules as under debate, and for soft-fork safety, that means spends should be treated as non-standard.
It's possible to go further: don't relay them unless the consensus rules are actually active for the next block. This extends non-relay to the period where a deployment is defined, started, locked in, or failed. I see no downsides to this, and the code change is very simple.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK 3d0556d410
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 3d0556d410🏓
jnewbery:
utACK 3d0556d410
Tree-SHA512: ca625a2981716b4b44e8f3722718fd25fd04e25bf3ca1684924b8974fca49f7c1d438fdd9dcdfbc091a442002e20d441d42c41a0e2096e74a61068da6c60267a
fab94534b6 doc: Document that wallet salvage is experimental (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
See #20151
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fab94534b6: user safety first
hebasto:
ACK fab94534b6, maybe capitalize into "WARNING"?
meshcollider:
Trivial ACK fab94534b6
Tree-SHA512: 94912c491facc485293e4333066057933d706d84c7172f615296e7ba998c583c8bd07e751e6f00cd6576e7791007ace321f959181f7bf6a4e15e10d7ec8a1b7e
ad5cef5dfd doc: Update data directory path comments (Hennadii Stepanov)
b19e88230f util: Add StripRedundantLastElementsOfPath function (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Wallet names in `listwalletdir` RPC are correct now, even if the `-datadir` path has any number of trailing `/`.
This PR is an alternative to #19933.
Fixes#19928.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK ad5cef5dfd🔙
promag:
Code review ACK ad5cef5dfd.
meshcollider:
Code review + test run ACK ad5cef5dfd
Tree-SHA512: bccabbd6c18243d48d15b2b27201cc0f5984623dcbc635c8740cf74523f359844c36eadd40391142874fcf452a43880bb6afbf89815ae736e499f9a98143a661
A string literal `"abc"` contains a terminating `\0`, so that is 4
bytes. There is no need to write `"abc\0"` unless two terminating
`\0`s are necessary.
`std::string` objects do not internally contain a terminating `\0`, so
`std::string("abc")` creates a string with size 3 and is the same as
`std::string("abc", 3)`.
In `"\01"` the `01` part is interpreted as one number (1) and that is
the same as `"\1"` which is a string like `{1, 0}` whereas `"\0z"` is a
string like `{0, 'z', 0}`. To create a string like `{0, '1', 0}` one
must use `"\0" "1"`.
Adjust the tests accordingly.
6c0259fc2f Squashed 'src/secp256k1/' changes from c6b6b8f1bb..3967d96bf1 (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Nothing important changed, but this silences this (erroneous) warning in certain GCC 9 versions:
```
In file included from src/secp256k1.c:16:
src/ecmult_impl.h: In function ‘secp256k1_ecmult’:
src/ecmult_impl.h:496:48: warning: array subscript [1, 268435456] is outside array bounds of ‘struct secp256k1_strauss_point_state[1]’ [-Warray-bounds]
496 | secp256k1_gej tmp = a[state->ps[np].input_pos];
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
src/ecmult_impl.h:565:42: note: while referencing ‘ps’
565 | struct secp256k1_strauss_point_state ps[1];
| ^~
src/ecmult_impl.h:502:139: warning: array subscript [1, 268435456] is outside array bounds of ‘struct secp256k1_strauss_point_state[1]’ [-Warray-bounds]
502 | secp256k1_fe_mul(state->zr + np * ECMULT_TABLE_SIZE(WINDOW_A), state->zr + np * ECMULT_TABLE_SIZE(WINDOW_A), &(a[state->ps[np].input_pos].z));
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
src/ecmult_impl.h:565:42: note: while referencing ‘ps’
565 | struct secp256k1_strauss_point_state ps[1];
| ^~
```
(see https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/issues/834)
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 5803f5f5f6 - performed the update myself and got the same change: [check_20257_subtree](https://github.com/fanquake/bitcoin/tree/check_20257_subtree).
hebasto:
ACK 5803f5f5f6, tested on Linux Mint 20 (x86_64) with `gcc (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) 9.3.0` -- no warnings are emitted.
Tree-SHA512: 386281d23aee93a3b1d1a09fec8319c3a477e46967430c935677eed54abddc62d5a7710f9eeab1ec476ace05adcb194b5b377712e44a6bb95a74ffa35faf77f3
398045ba8b cli -netinfo: print oversized/extreme ping times as "-" (Jon Atack)
773f4c99c0 cli -netinfo: handle longer tor v3 local addresses (Jon Atack)
33e987452f cli -netinfo: make age column variable-width (Jon Atack)
f8a1c4d946 cli -netinfo: various quick updates and fixes (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Quick fixups and updates for v0.21.0:
- [x] handle larger BIP155 `addrv2` addresses
- [x] add Signet chain
- [x] add an additional space between the `net` and `mping` columns; add missing `tinyformat` and `algorithm` headers
- [x] s/uptime/age/ per 0xB10C suggestion, and make the column auto-adjusting variable width
- [x] display `-` for oversized mping/ping times like `1.17348e+06`, as reported by practicalswift
Edit: removed the release note commit, as this PR was not merged before the notes were moved to the wiki. It's here:
```
- A new `bitcoin-cli -netinfo` command returns a network peer connections
dashboard that displays data from the `getpeerinfo` and `getnetworkinfo` RPCs
in a human-readable format. An optional integer argument from `0` to `4` may
be passed to see various levels of detail. (#19643)
```
ACKs for top commit:
michaelfolkson:
ACK 398045ba8b
Emzy:
Tested ACK 398045ba8b
Tree-SHA512: 0625ee840141bafbfcaf8f1fce53f8f850ae91721b2bdad4279372da87c18a1fe3a214d90bfdbbabdf6da38d58290d7dd0f1109b4e2ca5d20cacf417d6ced0f9
bbb42a6896 RPC: createwallet: Nicer error message if descriptor wallet requested and sqlite support not compiled in (Luke Dashjr)
6608fec332 GUI: Create Wallet: Nicely disable descriptor wallet checkbox if sqlite support not compiled in (Luke Dashjr)
7b54d768e1 Make sqlite support optional (compile-time) (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
As a new requirement, sqlite support should be optional. This PR aims to be only minimum/blocker changes for 0.21.
Potential follow-up PRs after this:
* Make BDB support optional
* Nicer error messages when user tries to load an unsupported wallet
* Don't compile descriptor wallet code if sqlite disabled
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
Tested ACK bbb42a6896
achow101:
ACK bbb42a6896
Sjors:
re-utACK bbb42a6896
hebasto:
ACK bbb42a6896, tested on Linux Mint 20 (x86_64, Qt 5.12.8).
Tree-SHA512: 500209dd1971310fab8ae51543343ce0ba91f088ccccff6109b4cc27547cd5532289dca6cb7dac2a7d7c59cdf3c8f5aacc31e9b0f912e38cea52ec26b97100bd
d419fdedbe [net processing] Don't add AlreadyHave txs to recentRejects (Troy Giorshev)
Pull request description:
If we already have a transaction, don't add it to recentRejects
Now, we only add a transaction to our recentRejects filter if we didn't already have it, meaning that it is added at most once, as intended.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK d419fdedbe
laanwj:
Code review ACK d419fdedbe
Tree-SHA512: cff5c1ba36c4700e2d6ab3eec4a3e51e1bef28fb3cc1bc850c84e06d6e5a9f6c32825207c253cc9cdf596b2eaadb6b5be68b3f8ca752b4ef6c31cf85138e3c99
3967d96bf1 Merge #838: Make autotools check for all the used openssl functions
3734b68200 Configure echo if openssl tests are enabled
6f54e69f03 Merge #841: Avoids a potentially shortening size_t to int cast in strauss_wnaf_
8893f42438 Avoids a potentially shortening size_t to int cast in strauss_wnaf_
e6692778d3 Modify bitcoin_secp.m4's openssl check to call all the functions that we use in the tests/benchmarks. That way linking will fail if those symbols are missing
ac05f61fcf Merge #809: Stop treating ECDH as experimental
e6e3d5da2f travis: add schnorrsig to valgrind and big endian platform test
353dff156f Stop treating ECDH as experimental
git-subtree-dir: src/secp256k1
git-subtree-split: 3967d96bf184519eb98b766af665b4d4b072563e
Outbound peer logic prevents connecting to addresses that we're already
connected to, so prevent inadvertent eviction of current peers via
test-before-evict by checking this condition and marking current peer's
addresses as Good().
Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com>
