fa21f83d29 ci: Use G++ in valgrind tasks (MarcoFalke)
fabd05bf65 refactor: Fix net_processing iwyu includes (MarcoFalke)
fa1622db20 refactor: Make node_id a const& in RemoveBlockRequest (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently, `valgrind` is not usable on a default build with GCC. Specifically, `p2p_compactblocks.py --valgrind` gives a false-positive in `RemoveBlockRequest` when comparing `node_id` with `from_peer`. According to the upstream bug report, this happens because both symbols are on the stack and the compiler can more aggressively optimize the compare (order). See https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472329#c7
It is possible to work around this bug by pulling at least one value from the stack. For example, by making `from_peer` a `const` reference. Alternatively, by replacing `auto [node_id, list_it]` with `const auto& [node_id, list_it]`, which is done here.
I think this workaround is acceptable, because it does not look like valgrind can trivially fix this. The alternative would be to add a (temporary?) suppression.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27741
Also, fix iwyu includes, while touching this module.
Also, switch the CI valgrind scripts to use G++.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa21f83d29
TheCharlatan:
ACK fa21f83d29
darosior:
utACK fa21f83d29
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa21f83d29. Code changes all look good but I'm a little confused about purpose of the third commit, so left a question about that
Tree-SHA512: 7b92cdafd525a5ac53ae2c1a7a92e599bc9b5fd5d315a694b493cd5079ac323d884393b57aa18581b7789247a588c9a27d47698de25b340bc76fc9f1dd1850b4
Includes known Valgrind warnings in our dependencies that cannot be fixed in-tree.
Example use:
```
$ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp src/test/test_bitcoin
$ valgrind --suppressions=contrib/valgrind.supp --leak-check=full \
--show-leak-kinds=all src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite
```
