a006d7d730 test: add logging to wallet_listtransactions (Sebastian Falbesoner)
47915b1187 test: remove unneeded/redundant code in wallet_listtransactions (Sebastian Falbesoner)
fb6c6a7938 test: speedup wallet_listtransactions by whitelisting peers (immediate tx relay) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR improves the test `wallet_listtransactions.py` in three ways:
* speeds up runtime by a factor of 2-3x by using the good ol' immediate tx relay trick (`-whitelist=noban@127.0.0.1`)
* removes unneeded/redundant code
* adds log messages, mostly by turning comments into `self.log.info(...)` calls
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK a006d7d730
kristapsk:
ACK a006d7d730
Tree-SHA512: a91a19f5ebc4d05f0b96c5419683c4c57ac0ef44b64eeb8dd550bd72296fd3a2857a3ba83f755fe4b0b3bd06439973f226070b5d0ce2dee58344dae78cb50290
Without this check, the tests would also pass if the CSV and
CLTV activation heights are not reached yet (e.g. if the .generate()
calls before are removed), as the operations OP_CSV and OP_CLTV
simply behave as NOPs.
Also fixes a comment in the sub-test `test_signing_with_cltv()`.
a806647d26 [validation] Always include merkle root in coinbase commitment (Dhruv Mehta)
189128c220 [validation] Set witness script flag with p2sh for blocks (Dhruv Mehta)
ac82b99db7 [p2p] remove redundant NODE_WITNESS checks (Dhruv Mehta)
6f8b198b82 [p2p] remove unused segwitheight=-1 option (Dhruv Mehta)
eba5b1cd64 [test] remove or move tests using `-segwitheight=-1` (Dhruv Mehta)
Pull request description:
Builds on #21009 and makes progress on remaining items in #17862
Removing `RewindBlockIndex()` in #21009 allows the following:
- removal of tests using `segwitheight=-1` in `p2p_segwit.py`.
- move `test_upgrade_after_activation()` out of `p2p_segwit.py` reducing runtime
- in turn, that allows us to drop support for `-segwitheight=-1`, which is only supported for that test.
- that allows us to always set `NODE_WITNESS` in our local services. The only reason we don't do that is to support `-segwitheight=-1`.
- that in turn allows us to drop all of the `GetLocalServices() & NODE_WITNESS` checks inside `net_processing.cpp`, since our local services would always include `NODE_WITNESS`
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code-Review ACK a806647d26
laanwj:
Code review ACK a806647d26, nice cleanup
jnewbery:
utACK a806647d26
theStack:
ACK a806647d26
Tree-SHA512: 73e1a69d1d7eca1f5c38558ec6672decd0b60b16c2ef6134df6f6af71bb159e6eea160f9bb5ab0eb6723c6632d29509811e29469d0d87abbe9b69a2890fbc73e
2ebf2fe0e4 test: check for RPC error 'Transaction already in block chain' (-27) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for the RPC error "Transaction already in block chain" (error code `RPC_VERIFY_ALREADY_IN_CHAIN` = `RPC_TRANSACTION_ALREADY_IN_CHAIN` = -27), which is thrown in the function `BroadcastTransaction` (src/node/transaction.cpp).
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
ACK 2ebf2fe0e4 (ran linter, looked at changes and ran modified test and checked code in `src/node/transaction.cpp`)
darosior:
ACK 2ebf2fe0e4
Tree-SHA512: 8bfbd3ff3da0cb3b8745f69b8ca2377f85fa99f0270750840b60e6ae43b5645c5c59b236993e8b2ad0444ec4171484e4f1ee23fa7e81b79d4222bcb623666fa5
20edf4bcf6 rpc: Return block time in getblockchaininfo (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Return tip time in `getblockchaininfo`, for some use cases this can save a call to `getblock`.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 20edf4bcf6
theStack:
re-ACK 20edf4bcf6
0xB10C:
ACK 20edf4bcf6
kristapsk:
ACK 20edf4bcf6
Zero-1729:
re-ACK 20edf4bcf6
Tree-SHA512: 29a920cfff1ef53e0af601c3f93f8f9171f3be47fc84b0fa293cb865b824976e8c1510b17b27d17daf0b8e658dd77d9dc388373395f0919fc4a23cd5019642d5
9b85a5e2f7 tests: Test for dumpwallet lock order issue (Andrew Chow)
25d99e6511 Reorder dumpwallet so that cs_main functions go first (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When a wallet is loaded which has an unconfirmed transaction in the mempool, it will end up establishing the lock order of cs_wallet -> cs_main -> cs_KeyStore. If `dumpwallet` is used on this wallet, then a lock order of cs_wallet -> cs_KeyStore -> cs_main will be used, which causes a lock order assertion. This PR fixes this by reordering `dumpwallet` and `GetKeyBirthTimes` (only used by `dumpwallet`). Specifically, in both functions, the function calls which lock cs_main are done prior to locking cs_KeyStore. This avoids the lock order issue.
Additionally, I have added a test case to `wallet_dump.py`. Of course testing this requires `--enable-debug`.
Fixes#22489
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 9b85a5e2f7🎰
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9b85a5e2f7. Nice to reduce lock scope, and good test!
prayank23:
tACK 9b85a5e2f7
lsilva01:
Tested ACK 9b85a5e2f7 under the same conditions reported in issue #22489 and the `dumpwallet` command completed successfully.
Tree-SHA512: d370a8f415ad64ee6a538ff419155837bcdbb167e3831b06572562289239028c6b46d80b23d227286afe875d9351f3377574ed831549ea426fb926af0e19c755
5a77abd4e6 [style] Clean up BroadcastTransaction() (John Newbery)
7282d4c036 [test] Allow rebroadcast for same-txid-different-wtxid transactions (glozow)
cd48372b67 [mempool] Allow rebroadcast for same-txid-different-wtxid transactions (John Newbery)
847b6ed48d [test] Test transactions are not re-added to unbroadcast set (Duncan Dean)
2837a9f1ea [mempool] Only add a transaction to the unbroadcast set when it's added to the mempool (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
1. Only add a transaction to the unbroadcast set when it's added to the mempool
Currently, if BroadcastTransaction() is called to rebroadcast a
transaction (e.g. by ResendWalletTransactions()), then we add the
transaction to the unbroadcast set. That transaction has already been
broadcast in the past, so peers are unlikely to request it again,
meaning RemoveUnbroadcastTx() won't be called and it won't be removed
from m_unbroadcast_txids.
Net processing will therefore continue to attempt rebroadcast for the
transaction every 10-15 minutes. This will most likely continue until
the node connects to a new peer which hasn't yet seen the transaction
(or perhaps indefinitely).
Fix by only adding the transaction to the broadcast set when it's added to the mempool.
2. Allow rebroadcast for same-txid-different-wtxid transactions
There is some slightly unexpected behaviour when:
- there is already transaction in the mempool (the "mempool tx")
- BroadcastTransaction() is called for a transaction with the same txid
as the mempool transaction but a different witness (the "new tx")
Prior to this commit, if BroadcastTransaction() is called with
relay=true, then it'll call RelayTransaction() using the txid/wtxid of
the new tx, not the txid/wtxid of the mempool tx. For wtxid relay peers,
in SendMessages(), the wtxid of the new tx will be taken from
setInventoryTxToSend, but will then be filtered out from the vector of
wtxids to announce, since m_mempool.info() won't find the transaction
(the mempool contains the mempool tx, which has a different wtxid from
the new tx).
Fix this by calling RelayTransaction() with the wtxid of the mempool
transaction in this case.
The third commit is a comment/whitespace only change to tidy up the BroadcastTransaction() function.
ACKs for top commit:
duncandean:
reACK 5a77abd
naumenkogs:
ACK 5a77abd4e6
theStack:
re-ACK 5a77abd4e6
lsilva01:
re-ACK 5a77abd4e6
Tree-SHA512: d1a46d32a9f975220e5b432ff6633fac9be01ea41925b4958395b8d641680500dc44476b12d18852e5b674d2d87e4d0160b4483e45d3d149176bdff9f4dc8516
5730a43703 test: Add functional test for AddrFetch connections (Martin Zumsande)
c34ad3309f net, rpc: Enable AddrFetch connections for functional testing (Martin Zumsande)
533500d907 p2p: Add timeout for AddrFetch peers (Martin Zumsande)
b6c5d1e450 p2p: AddrFetch - don't disconnect on self-announcements (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
AddrFetch connections (old name: oneshots) are intended to be short-lived connections on which we ask a peer for addresses via `getaddr` and disconnect after receiving them.
This is done by disconnecting after receiving the first `addr`. However, it is no longer working as intended, because nowadays, the first `addr` a typical bitcoin core node sends is its self-announcement.
So we'll disconnect before the peer gets a chance to answer our `getaddr`.
I checked that this affects both `-seednode` peers specified manually, and DNS seeds when AddrFetch is used as a fallback if DNS doesn't work for us.
The current behavior of getting peers via AddrFetch when starting with an empty addrman would be to connect to the peer, receive its self-announcement and add it to addrman, disconnect, reconnect to the same peer again as a full outbound (no other addresses in addrman) and then receive more `addr`. This is silly and not in line with AddrFetch peer being intended to be short-lived peers.
Fix this by only disconnecting after receiving an `addr` message of size > 1.
[Edit] As per review discussion, this PR now also adds a timeout after which we disconnect if we haven't received any suitable `addr`, and a functional test.
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
reACK 5730a43703
naumenkogs:
ACK 5730a43703
jnewbery:
ACK 5730a43703
Tree-SHA512: 8a81234f37e827705138eb254223f7f3b3bf44a06cb02126fc7990b0d231b9bd8f07d38d185cc30d55bf35548a6fdc286b69602498d875b937e7c58332158bf9
Adds a test for the condition which can trigger a lock order assertion.
Specifically, there must be an unconfirmed transaction in the mempool
which belongs to the wallet being loaded. This will establish the order
of cs_wallet -> cs_main -> cs_KeyStore. Then dumpwallet is called on
that wallet. Previously, this would have used a lock order of cs_wallet
-> cs_KeyStore -> cs_main, but this should be fixed now. The test
ensures that.
a4bcd687c9 Improve tests using statistics (John Newbery)
f424d601e1 Add logging and addr rate limiting statistics (Pieter Wuille)
b4ece8a1cd Functional tests for addr rate limiting (Pieter Wuille)
5648138f59 Randomize the order of addr processing (Pieter Wuille)
0d64b8f709 Rate limit the processing of incoming addr messages (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
The rate at which IP addresses are rumoured (through ADDR and ADDRV2 messages) on the network seems to vary from 0 for some non-participating nodes, to 0.005-0.025 addr/s for recent Bitcoin Core nodes. However, the current codebase will happily accept and process an effectively unbounded rate from attackers. There are measures to limit the influence attackers can have on the addrman database (bucket restrictions based on source IPs), but still - there is no need to permit them to feed us addresses at a rate that's orders of magnitude larger than what is common on the network today, especially as it will cause us to spam our peers too.
This PR implements a [token bucket](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Token_bucket) based rate limiter, allowing an average of 0.1 addr/s per connection, with bursts up to 1000 addresses at once. Whitelisted peers as well as responses to GETADDR requests are exempt from the limit. New connections start with 1 token, so as to not interfere with the common practice of peers' self-announcement.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK a4bcd687c9
vasild:
ACK a4bcd687c9
jnewbery:
ACK a4bcd687c9
jonatack:
ACK a4bcd687c9
Tree-SHA512: b757de76ad78a53035b622944c4213b29b3b55d3d98bf23585afa84bfba10808299d858649f92269a16abfa75eb4366ea047eae3216f7e2f6d3c455782a16bea
-> remove unneeded get-out-of IBD generate()
(The test framework already sets up the nodes to be out of IBD
in setup_nodes(), if setup_clean_chain is not set to True)
-> remove duplicate code line assigning an utxo
By whitelisting the peers via -whitelist, the inventory is transmissioned
immediately rather than on average every 5 seconds, speeding up the test by at
least a factor of two:
before:
$ time ./wallet_listtransactions.py
...
0m40.25s real 0m01.74s user 0m01.70s system
with this PR:
$ time ./wallet_listtransactions.py
...
0m14.93s real 0m01.68s user 0m01.87s system
This commit also moves the wallet_listtransactions tests into the < 30s group.
While limitations on the influence of attackers on addrman already
exist (affected buckets are restricted to a subset based on incoming
IP / network group), there is no reason to permit them to let them
feed us addresses at more than a multiple of the normal network
rate.
This commit introduces a "token bucket" rate limiter for the
processing of addresses in incoming ADDR and ADDRV2 messages.
Every connection gets an associated token bucket. Processing an
address in an ADDR or ADDRV2 message from non-whitelisted peers
consumes a token from the bucket. If the bucket is empty, the
address is ignored (it is not forwarded or processed). The token
counter increases at a rate of 0.1 tokens per second, and will
accrue up to a maximum of 1000 tokens (the maximum we accept in a
single ADDR or ADDRV2). When a GETADDR is sent to a peer, it
immediately gets 1000 additional tokens, as we actively desire many
addresses from such peers (this may temporarily cause the token
count to exceed 1000).
The rate limit of 0.1 addr/s was chosen based on observation of
honest nodes on the network. Activity in general from most nodes
is either 0, or up to a maximum around 0.025 addr/s for recent
Bitcoin Core nodes. A few (self-identified, through subver) crawler
nodes occasionally exceed 0.1 addr/s.
7593b06bd1 test: ensure I2P addresses are relayed (Vasil Dimov)
e7468139a1 test: make CAddress in functional tests comparable (Vasil Dimov)
33e211d2a4 test: implement ser/unser of I2P addresses in functional tests (Vasil Dimov)
86742811ce test: use NODE_* constants instead of magic numbers (Vasil Dimov)
ba45f02708 net: relay I2P addresses even if not reachable (by us) (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Nodes that can reach the I2P network (have set `-i2psam=`) will relay
I2P addresses even without this patch. However, nodes that can't reach
the I2P network will not. This was done as a precaution in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20119 before anybody could
connect to I2P because then, for sure, it would have been useless.
Now, however, we have I2P support and a bunch of I2P nodes, so get all
nodes on the network to relay I2P addresses to help with propagation,
similarly to what we do with Tor addresses.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 7593b06bd1
naumenkogs:
ACK 7593b06bd1.
laanwj:
Code review ACK 7593b06bd1
kristapsk:
ACK 7593b06bd1. Code looks correct, tested that functional test suite passes and also that `test/functional/p2p_addrv2_replay.py` fails if I undo changes in `IsRelayable()`.
Tree-SHA512: c9feec4a9546cc06bc2fec6d74f999a3c0abd3d15b7c421c21fcf2d610eb94611489e33d61bdcd5a4f42041a6d84aa892f7ae293b0d4f755309a8560b113b735
a3d6ec5bb5 test: move rpc_rawtransaction tests to < 30s group (Jon Atack)
5a1ed96077 test: whitelist rpc_rawtransaction peers to speed up tests (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Speed up the somewhat slow `rpc_rawtransaction.py` test by more than 3x (from 45-55 seconds to 15 seconds on a laptop running 2 x 2.5GHz).
ACKs for top commit:
mjdietzx:
ACK a3d6ec5bb5
kristapsk:
ACK a3d6ec5bb5
theStack:
ACK a3d6ec5bb5🐎
brunoerg:
tACK a3d6ec5bb5
Tree-SHA512: f1d105594c9b5b257a7096b631a6fa5aeb50e330a351f75c2d6ffa7dd73abdb6e1f596a78c16d204a9bac3fe506e0519f9ad96bb8477ab6424c8e18125ccb659
fa80e10d94 test: Add feature_taproot.py --previous_release (MarcoFalke)
85ccffa266 test: move releases download incantation to README (Sjors Provoost)
29d6b1da2a test: previous releases: add v0.20.1 (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Disabling the new consensus code at runtime is fine, but potentially fragile and incomplete. Fix that by giving the option to run with a version that has been compiled without any taproot code.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK fa80e10
NelsonGaldeman:
tACK fa80e10d94
Tree-SHA512: 1a1feef823f08c05268759645a8974e1b2d39a024258f5e6acecbe25097aae3fa9302c27262978b40f1aa8e7b525b60c0047199010f2a5d6017dd6434b4066f0
4101ec9d2e doc: mention that we enforce port=0 in I2P (Vasil Dimov)
e0a2b390c1 addrman: reset I2P ports to 0 when loading from disk (Vasil Dimov)
41cda9d075 test: ensure I2P ports are handled as expected (Vasil Dimov)
4f432bd738 net: do not connect to I2P hosts on port!=0 (Vasil Dimov)
1f096f091e net: distinguish default port per network (Vasil Dimov)
aeac3bce3e net: change I2P seeds' ports to 0 (Vasil Dimov)
38f900290c net: change assumed I2P port to 0 (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
_This is an alternative to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514, inspired by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514#issuecomment-815049933. They are mutually exclusive. Just one of them should be merged._
Change assumed ports for I2P to 0 (instead of the default 8333) as this is closer to what actually happens underneath with SAM 3.1 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514#issuecomment-812632520, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514#issuecomment-816564719).
Don't connect to I2P peers with advertised port != 0 (we don't specify a port to our SAM 3.1 proxy and it always connects to port = 0).
Note, this change:
* Keeps I2P addresses with port != 0 in addrman and relays them to others via P2P gossip. There may be non-bitcoin-core-22.0 peers using SAM 3.2 and for them such addresses may be useful.
* Silently refuses to connect to I2P hosts with port != 0. This is ok for automatically chosen peers from addrman. Not so ok for peers provided via `-addnode` or `-connect` - a user who specifies `foo.b32.i2p:1234` (non zero port) may wonder why "nothing is happening".
Fixes#21389
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 4101ec9d2e
jonatack:
re-ACK 4101ec9d2e per `git range-diff efff9c3 0b0ee03 4101ec9`, built with DDEBUG_ADDRMAN, did fairly extensive testing on mainnet both with and without a peers.dat / -dnsseeds=0 to test boostrapping.
Tree-SHA512: 0e3c019e1dc05e54f559275859d3450e0c735596d179e30b66811aad9d5b5fabe3dcc44571e8f7b99f9fe16453eee393d6e153454dd873b9ff14907d4e6354fe
2feec3ce31 net: don't bind on 0.0.0.0 if binds are restricted to Tor (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
The semantic of `-bind` is to restrict the binding only to some address.
If not specified, then the user does not care and we bind to `0.0.0.0`.
If specified then we should honor the restriction and bind only to the
specified address.
Before this change, if no `-bind` is given then we would bind to
`0.0.0.0:8333` and to `127.0.0.1:8334` (incoming Tor) which is ok -
the user does not care to restrict the binding.
However, if only `-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary
`-bind=`) then we would bind to `addr:port` _and_ to `0.0.0.0:8333` in
addition.
Change the above to not do the additional bind: if only
`-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary `-bind=`) then bind
to `addr:port` (only) and consider incoming connections to that as Tor
and do not advertise it. I.e. a Tor-only node.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 2feec3ce31
jonatack:
utACK 2feec3ce31 per `git diff a004833 2feec3c`
hebasto:
ACK 2feec3ce31, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64):
Tree-SHA512: a04483af601706da928958b92dc560f9cfcc78ab0bb9d74414636eed1c6f29ed538ce1fb5a17d41ed82c9c9a45ca94899d0966e7ef93da809c9bcdcdb1d1f040
b7a8cd9963 [test] submit same txid different wtxid as mempool tx (glozow)
fdb48163bf [validation] distinguish same txid different wtxid in mempool (glozow)
Pull request description:
On master, if you submit a transaction with the same txid but different witness to the mempool, it thinks the transactions are the same. Users submitting through `BroadcastTransaction()` (i.e. `sendrawtransaction` or the wallet) don't get notified that there's a different transaction in the mempool, although it doesn't crash. Users submitting through `testmempoolaccept()` will get a "txn-already-in-mempool" error.
This PR simply distinguishes between `txn-already-in-mempool` and `txn-same-nonwitness-data-in-mempool`, without handling them differently: `sendrawtransaction` still will not throw, but `testmempoolaccept` will give you a different error.
I believe the intention of #19645 is to allow full swaps of transactions that have different witnesses but identical nonwitness data. Returning a different error message + adding a test was suggested: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19645#issuecomment-705109193 so this is that PR.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK b7a8cd9963
jnewbery:
Code review ACK b7a8cd9963
theStack:
Code-review ACK b7a8cd9963
darosior:
re-utACK b7a8cd9963
Tree-SHA512: 9c6591edaf8727ba5b4675977adb8cbdef7288584003b6cd659828032dc92d2ae915800a8ef8b6fdffe112c1b660df72297a3dcf2e2e3e1f959c6cb3678c63ee
905d672b74 test: use script_util helpers for creating P2W{PKH,SH} scripts (Sebastian Falbesoner)
285a65ccfd test: use script_util helpers for creating P2SH scripts (Sebastian Falbesoner)
b57b633b94 test: use script_util helpers for creating P2PKH scripts (Sebastian Falbesoner)
61b6a017a9 test: wallet util: fix multisig P2SH-P2WSH script creation (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
PR #18788 (commit 08067aebfd) introduced functions to generate output scripts for various types. This PR replaces all manual CScript creations in the P2PKH, P2SH, P2WPKH, P2WSH formats with those helpers in order to increase readability and maintainability over the functional test codebase. The first commit fixes a bug in the wallet_util helper module w.r.t. to P2SH-P2WSH script creation (the result is not used in any test so far, hence it can still be seen as refactoring).
The following table shows a summary of the output script patterns tackled in this PR:
| Type | master branch | PR branch |
| ---------- | ------------- | ------------- |
| P2PKH | `CScript([OP_DUP, OP_HASH160, hash160(key), OP_EQUALVERIFY, OP_CHECKSIG])` | `key_to_p2pkh_script(key)` |
| | `CScript([OP_DUP, OP_HASH160, keyhash, OP_EQUALVERIFY, OP_CHECKSIG])` | `keyhash_to_p2pkh_script(keyhash)` |
| P2SH | `CScript([OP_HASH160, hash160(script), OP_EQUAL])` | `script_to_p2sh_script(script)` |
| P2WPKH | `CScript([OP_0, hash160(key)])` | `key_to_p2wpkh_script(key)` |
| P2WSH | `CScript([OP_0, sha256(script)])` | `script_to_p2wsh_script(script)` |
Note that the `key_to_...` helpers can't be used if an invalid key size (not 33 or 65 bytes) is passed, which is the case in some rare instances where the scripts still have to be created manually.
Possible follow-up ideas:
* further simplify by identifying P2SH-wrapped scripts and using `key_to_p2sh_p2wpkh_script()` and `script_to_p2sh_p2wsh_script()` helpers
* introduce and use `key_to_p2pk_script()` helper for P2PK scripts
ACKs for top commit:
rajarshimaitra:
tACK 905d672b74
LarryRuane:
tACK 905d672b74
0xB10C:
ACK 905d672b74
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 905d672b74 🕹
Tree-SHA512: 7ccfe69699bc81168ac122b03536720013355c1b2fbb088355b616015318644c4d1cd27e20c4f56c89ad083ae609add4bc838cf6316794d0edb0ce9cf7fa0fd8
The semantic of `-bind` is to restrict the binding only to some address.
If not specified, then the user does not care and we bind to `0.0.0.0`.
If specified then we should honor the restriction and bind only to the
specified address.
Before this change, if no `-bind` is given then we would bind to
`0.0.0.0:8333` and to `127.0.0.1:8334` (incoming Tor) which is ok -
the user does not care to restrict the binding.
However, if only `-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary
`-bind=`) then we would bind to `addr:port` _and_ to `0.0.0.0:8333` in
addition.
Change the above to not do the additional bind: if only
`-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary `-bind=`) then bind
to `addr:port` (only) and consider incoming connections to that as Tor
and do not advertise it. I.e. a Tor-only node.
This reject reason is triggered for non-coinbase transactions with
a coinbase-like outpoint, i.e. hash=0, n=0xffffffff.
Note that the invalid tx templates are currently used in the
functional tests feature_block.py and p2p_invalid_tx.py.
c4ddee64c7 test: Add test for replacement relay fee check (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
This PR adds rename the `reject_reason` of our implementation of BIP125 rule 4 and adds missing functional test coverage. Note, `insufficient fee` is already the `reject_reason` of few others `PreChecks` replacement checks and as such might be confusing.
> The replacement transaction must also pay for its own bandwidth at or above the rate set by the node's minimum relay fee setting. For example, if the minimum relay fee is 1 satoshi/byte and the replacement transaction is 500 bytes total, then the replacement must pay a fee at least 500 satoshis higher than the sum of the originals.
```
// Finally in addition to paying more fees than the conflicts the
// new transaction must pay for its own bandwidth.
CAmount nDeltaFees = nModifiedFees - nConflictingFees;
if (nDeltaFees < ::incrementalRelayFee.GetFee(nSize))
{
return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "insufficient fee",
strprintf("rejecting replacement %s, not enough additional fees to relay; %s < %s",
hash.ToString(),
FormatMoney(nDeltaFees),
FormatMoney(::incrementalRelayFee.GetFee(nSize))));
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK c4ddee64c7
glozow:
ACK c4ddee6, one small suggestion if you retouch.
Tree-SHA512: 7c5d1065db6e6fe57a9f083bf051a7a55eb9892de3a2888679d4a6853491608c93b6e35887ef383a9988d14713fa13a0b1d6134b7354af5fd54765f0d4e98568
3efaf83c75 wallet: deactivate descriptor (S3RK)
6737d9655b test: wallet importdescriptors update existing (S3RK)
586f1d53d6 wallet: maintain SPK consistency on internal flag change (S3RK)
f1b7db1474 wallet: don't mute exceptions in importdescriptors (S3RK)
bf68ebc1cd wallet: allow to import same descriptor twice (S3RK)
Pull request description:
Rationale: allow updating existing descriptors with `importdescriptors` command.
Currently if you run same `importdescriptors` command twice with a descriptor containing private key you will get very confusing error — `Missing required fields`. What happens is that Wallet tries to write imported private key to the disk, but it exists already so we get `DB_KEYEXIST (-30995)` from BerkelyDB. Please note, that we set `DB_NOOVERWRITE` (I guess not to lose some keys accidentally). The exception is caught in `catch (...)` in rpcdump.cpp with a generic error.
With this PR if a descriptor is already present than we will update its activeness, internalness, label, range and next_index.
For the range only expansion is allowed (range start can only decrease, range end increase).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 3efaf83c75
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 3efaf83c75
jonatack:
Light ACK 3efaf83c75 per `git range-diff a000cb0 5d96704 3efaf83` and as a sanity check, re-debug-built on debian with gcc 10.2.1 and clang 11, ran wallet_importdescriptors.py
Tree-SHA512: 122c4b621d64ec8a3b625f3aed9f01a2b5cbaf2029ad0325b5ff38d67fff5cd35324335fabe2dd5169548b01b267c81be6ae0f5c834342f3d5f6eeed515c4843
