a9d20eeceb doc: bump bips.md up-to-date version to v24.0 (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This is a trivial follow-up to #26124.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK a9d20eeceb
Tree-SHA512: 24c17c72498f96f9122d8fb041f1f6f63bd186e25ac3cb5a661bb1993106c6632f5efd95a15d19681004d30d38eca2d2a16b383a7a1f1c3db17f887ae1fcd02a
0811cbfc28 doc: add info about status code 404 for some rest endpoints (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds an explanation about status code 404 for 2 endpoints (`/rest/tx/ `and `/rest/blockhashbyheight/`) in`REST-interface.md`. There are other endpoints that already cover it.
ACKs for top commit:
[deleted]:
reACK 0811cbfc28
shaavan:
ACK 0811cbfc28
Tree-SHA512: a01ac6653f706b7a7e4a4679a2b81e448381f31460ac4bcfc179af6186401cffae7b49a82f3a52c89e556acd5c16c159ce752c7a678177900ddf2e4e5c72fe6b
9580480570 Update debug logging section in the developer notes (Jon Atack)
1abaa31aa3 Update -debug and -debugexclude help docs for severity level logging (Jon Atack)
45f9282162 Create BCLog::Level::Trace log severity level (Jon Atack)
2a8712db4f Unit test coverage for -loglevel configuration option (klementtan)
eb7bee5f84 Create -loglevel configuration option (klementtan)
98a1f9c687 Unit test coverage for log severity levels (klementtan)
9c7507bf76 Create BCLog::Logger::LogLevelsString() helper function (klementtan)
8fe3457dbb Update LogAcceptCategory() and unit tests with log severity levels (klementtan)
c2797cfc60 Add BCLog::Logger::SetLogLevel()/SetCategoryLogLevel() for string inputs (klementtan)
f6c0cc0350 Add BCLog::Logger::m_category_log_levels data member and getter/setter (Jon Atack)
2978b387bf Add BCLog::Logger::m_log_level data member and getter/setter (Jon Atack)
f1379aeca9 Simplify BCLog::Level enum class and LogLevelToStr() function (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This is an updated version of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25287 and the next steps in parent PR #25203 implementing, with Klement Tan, user-configurable, per-category severity log levels based on an idea by John Newbery and refined in GitHub discussions by Wladimir Van der Laan and Marco Falke.
- simplify the `BCLog::Level` enum class and the `LogLevelToStr()` function and add documentation
- update the logging logic to filter logs by log level both globally and per-category
- add a hidden `-loglevel` help-debug config option to allow testing setting the global or per-category severity level on startup for logging categories enabled with the `-debug` configuration option or the logging RPC (Klement Tan)
- add a `trace` log severity level selectable by the user; the plan is for the current debug messages to become trace, LogPrint ones to become debug, and LogPrintf ones to become info, warning, or error
```
$ ./src/bitcoind -help-debug | grep -A10 loglevel
-loglevel=<level>|<category>:<level>
Set the global or per-category severity level for logging categories
enabled with the -debug configuration option or the logging RPC:
info, debug, trace (default=info); warning and error levels are
always logged. If <category>:<level> is supplied, the setting
will override the global one and may be specified multiple times
to set multiple category-specific levels. <category> can be:
addrman, bench, blockstorage, cmpctblock, coindb, estimatefee,
http, i2p, ipc, leveldb, libevent, lock, mempool, mempoolrej,
net, proxy, prune, qt, rand, reindex, rpc, selectcoins, tor,
util, validation, walletdb, zmq.
```
See the individual commit messages for details.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
One final push per `git range-diff a5d5569 ce3c4c9 9580480` (should be trivial to re-ACK) to ensure this pull changes no default behavior in any way for users or the tests/CI in order to be completely v24 compatible, to update the unit test setup in general, and to update the debug logging section in the developer notes.
klementtan:
reACK 9580480570
1440000bytes:
reACK 9580480570
vasild:
ACK 9580480570
dunxen:
reACK 9580480
brunoerg:
reACK 9580480570
Tree-SHA512: 476a638e0581f40b5d058a9992691722e8b546471ec85e07cbc990798d1197fbffbd02e1b3d081b4978404e07a428378cdc8e159c0004b81f58be7fb01b7cba0
53e7ed075c doc: Release notes and other docs for migration (Andrew Chow)
9c44bfe244 Test migratewallet (Andrew Chow)
0b26e7cdf2 descriptors: addr() and raw() should return false for ToPrivateString (Andrew Chow)
31764c3f87 Add migratewallet RPC (Andrew Chow)
0bf7b38bff Implement MigrateLegacyToDescriptor (Andrew Chow)
e7b16f925a Implement MigrateToSQLite (Andrew Chow)
5b62f095e7 wallet: Refactor SetupDescSPKMs to take CExtKey (Andrew Chow)
22401f17e0 Implement LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::DeleteRecords (Andrew Chow)
35f428fae6 Implement LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::MigrateToDescriptor (Andrew Chow)
ea1ab390e4 scriptpubkeyman: Implement GetScriptPubKeys in Legacy (Andrew Chow)
e664af2976 Apply label to all scriptPubKeys of imported combo() (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a new `migratewallet` RPC which migrates a legacy wallet to a descriptor wallet. Migrated wallets will need a new backup. If a wallet has watchonly stuff in it, a new watchonly descriptor wallet will be created containing those watchonly things. The related transactions, labels, and descriptors for those watchonly things will be removed from the original wallet. Migrated wallets will not have any of the legacy things be available for fetching from `getnewaddress` or `getrawchangeaddress`. Wallets that have private keys enabled will have newly generated descriptors. Wallets with private keys disabled will not have any active `ScriptPubKeyMan`s.
For the basic HD wallet case of just generated keys, in addition to the standard descriptor wallet descriptors using the master key derived from the pre-existing hd seed, the migration will also create 3 descriptors for each HD chain in: a ranged combo external, a ranged combo internal, and a single key combo for the seed (the seed is a valid key that we can receive coins at!). The migrated wallet will then have newly generated descriptors as the active `ScriptPubKeyMan`s. This is equivalent to creating a new descriptor wallet and importing the 3 descriptors for each HD chain. For wallets containing non-HD keys, each key will have its own combo descriptor.
There are also tests.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK 53e7ed075c
w0xlt:
reACK 53e7ed075c
Tree-SHA512: c0c003694ca2e17064922d08e8464278d314e970efb7df874b4fe04ec5d124c7206409ca701c65c099d17779ab2136ae63f1da2a9dba39b45f6d62cf93b5c60a
59aa54f731 i2p: log "SAM session" instead of "session" (Vasil Dimov)
d7ec30b648 doc: add release notes about the I2P transient addresses (Vasil Dimov)
47c0d02f12 doc: document I2P transient addresses usage in doc/i2p.md (Vasil Dimov)
3914e472f5 test: add a test that -i2pacceptincoming=0 creates a transient session (Vasil Dimov)
ae1e97ce86 net: use transient I2P session for outbound if -i2pacceptincoming=0 (Vasil Dimov)
a1580a04f5 net: store an optional I2P session in CNode (Vasil Dimov)
2b781ad66e i2p: add support for creating transient sessions (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Add support for generating a transient, one-time I2P address for ourselves when making I2P outbound connection and discard it once the connection is closed.
Background
---
In I2P connections, the host that receives the connection knows the I2P address of the connection initiator. This is unlike the Tor network where the recipient does not know who is connecting to them, not even the initiator's Tor address.
Persistent vs transient I2P addresses
---
Even if an I2P node is not accepting incoming connections, they are known to other nodes by their outgoing I2P address. This creates an opportunity to white-list given nodes or treat them differently based on their I2P address. However, this also creates an opportunity to fingerprint or analyze a given node because it always uses the same I2P address when it connects to other nodes. If this is undesirable, then a node operator can use the newly introduced `-i2ptransientout` to generate a transient (disposable), one-time I2P address for each new outgoing connection. That address is never going to be reused again, not even if reconnecting to the same peer later.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
ACK 59aa54f731 (verified via range-diff that just a typo / `unique_ptr` initialisation were fixed)
achow101:
re-ACK 59aa54f731
jonatack:
utACK 59aa54f731 reviewed range diff, rebased to master, debug build + relevant tests + review at each commit
Tree-SHA512: 2be9b9dd7502b2d44a75e095aaece61700766bff9af0a2846c29ca4e152b0a92bdfa30f61e8e32b6edb1225f74f1a78d19b7bf069f00b8f8173e69705414a93e
1dc03dda05 [doc] remove non-signaling mentions of BIP125 (glozow)
32024d40f0 scripted-diff: remove mention of BIP125 from non-signaling var names (glozow)
Pull request description:
We have pretty thorough documentation of our RBF policy in doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md. It enumerates each rule with several sentences of rationale. Also, each rule pretty much has its own function (3 and 4 share one), with extensive comments. The doc states explicitly that our rules are similar but differ from BIP125, and contains a record of historical changes to RBF policy.
We should not use "BIP125" as synonymous with our RBF policy because:
- Our RBF policy is different from what is specified in BIP125, for example:
- the BIP does not mention our rule about the replacement feerate being higher (our Rule 6)
- the BIP uses minimum relay feerate for Rule 4, while we have used incremental relay feerate since #9380
- the "inherited signaling" question (CVE-2021-31876). Call it discrepancy, ambiguous wording, doc misinterpretation, or implementation details, I would recommend users refer to doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md
- the signaling policy is configurable, see #25353
- Our RBF policy may change further
- We have already marked BIP125 as only "partially implemented" in docs/bips.md since 1fd49eb498
- See comments from people who are not me recently:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25038#discussion_r909507429
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25575#issuecomment-1179519204
This PR removes all non-signaling mentions of BIP125 (if people feel strongly, we can remove all mentions of BIP125 period). It may be useful to refer to the concept of "tx opts in to RBF if it has at least one nSequence less than (0xffffffff - 1)" as "BIP125 signaling" because:
- It is succint.
- It has already been widely marketed as BIP125 opt-in signaling.
- Our API uses it when referring to signaling (e.g. getmempoolentry["bip125-replaceable"] and wallet error message "not BIP 125 replaceable"). Changing those is more invasive.
- If/when we have other ways to signal in the future, we can disambiguate them this way. See #25038 which proposes another way of signaling, and where I pulled these commits from.
Alternatives:
- Changing our policy to match BIP125. This doesn't make sense as, for example, we would have to remove the requirement that a replacement tx has a higher feerate (Rule 6).
- Changing BIP125 to match what we have. This doesn't make sense as it would be a significant change to a BIP years after it was finalized and already used as a spec to implement RBF in other places.
- Document our policy as a new BIP and give it a number. This might make sense if we don't expect things to change a lot, and can be done as a next step.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
ACK 1dc03dda05
ariard:
ACK 1dc03dda
t-bast:
ACK 1dc03dda05
Tree-SHA512: a3adc2039ec5785892d230ec442e50f47f7062717392728152bbbe27ce1c564141f85253143f53cb44e1331cf47476d74f5d2f4b3cd873fc3433d7a0aa783e02
a6b0c1fcc0 doc: add releases notes for 25504 (listsinceblock updates) (Antoine Poinsot)
0fd2d14454 rpc: add an include_change parameter to listsinceblock (Antoine Poinsot)
55f98d087e rpc: output parent wallet descriptors for coins in listunspent (Antoine Poinsot)
b724476158 rpc: output wallet descriptors for received entries in listsinceblock (Antoine Poinsot)
55a82eaf91 wallet: allow to fetch the wallet descriptors for a given Script (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
Wallet descriptors are useful for applications using the Bitcoin Core wallet as a backend for tracking coins, as they allow to track coins for multiple descriptors in a single wallet. However there is no information currently given for such applications to link a coin with an imported descriptor, severely limiting the possibilities for such applications of using multiple descriptors in a single wallet. This PR outputs the matching imported descriptor(s) for a given received coin in `listsinceblock` (and friends).
It comes from a need for an application i'm working on, but i think it's something any software using `bitcoind` to track multiple descriptors in a single wallet would have eventually. For instance i'm thinking about the BDK project. Currently, the way to achieve this is to import raw addresses with labels and to have your application be responsible for wallet things like the gap limit.
I'll add this to the output of `listunspent` too if this gets a few Concept ACKs.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK a6b0c1fcc0
achow101:
re-ACK a6b0c1fcc0
Tree-SHA512: 7a5850e8de98b439ddede2cb72de0208944f8cda67272e8b8037678738d55b7a5272375be808b0f7d15def4904430e089dafdcc037436858ff3292c5f8b75e37
544b4332f0 Add wallet tests for spending rawtr() (Pieter Wuille)
e1e3081200 If P2TR tweaked key is available, sign with it (Pieter Wuille)
8d9670ccb7 Add rawtr() descriptor for P2TR with unknown tweak (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
It may be useful to be able to represent P2TR outputs in descriptors whose script tree and/or internal key aren't known. This PR does that, by adding a `rawtr(KEY)` descriptor, where the KEY represents the output key directly. If the private key corresponding to that output key is known, it also permits signing with it.
I'm not convinced this is desirable, but presumably "tr(KEY)" sounds more intended for direct use than "rawtr(KEY)".
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 544b4332f0
sanket1729:
code review ACK 544b4332f0
w0xlt:
reACK 544b4332f0
Tree-SHA512: 0de08de517468bc22ab0c00db471ce33144f5dc211ebc2974c6ea95709f44e830532ec5cdb0128c572513d352120bd651c4559516d4500b5b0a3d257c4b45aca
Our RBF policy is different from the rules specified in BIP125. For
example, the BIP does not mention Rule 6, and our Rule 4 uses the
(configurable) incremental relay feerate (distinct from the
minimum relay feerate). Those interested in our policy should refer to
doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md instead. These rules may also
continue to diverge with package RBF and other RBF improvements. Keep
references to the BIP125 signaling wrt sequence numbers, since that is
still correct and widely used. It is helpful to refer to this as "BIP125
signaling" since it is unambiguous and succint, especially if we have
multiple ways to signal replaceability in the future.
The rule numbers in doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md correspond
largely to those of BIP 125, so we can still refer to them like "Rule 5."
ab3c06db1a doc: Release notes for default RBF (Andrew Chow)
61d9149e78 rpc: Default rbf enabled (Andrew Chow)
e3c33637ba wallet: Enable -walletrbf by default (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The GUI currently opts in to RBF by default, but RPCs do not, and `-walletrbf` is default disabled. This PR makes the default in those two places to also opt in.
The last time this was proposed (#9527), the primary objections were the novelty at the time, the inability to bump transactions, and the gui not having the option to disable rbf. In the 5 years since, RBF usage has steadily grown, with ~27% of txs opting in. The GUI has the option to enable/disable RBF, and is also defaulted to having it enabled. And we have the ability to bump RBF'd transactions in both the RPC and the GUI. So I think it makes sense to finally change the default to always opt in to RBF.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
reACK ab3c06db1a
aureleoules:
ACK ab3c06db1a.
glozow:
utACK ab3c06db1a
Tree-SHA512: 81b012c5033e270f86a87a6a196ccc549eb54b158eebf88e917cc6621d40d7bdcd1566b602688907dd5d364b95a557b29f97dce869cea512e339588262c027b6
dc02edcba1 doc: update the URLs to thread functions in developer-notes (Vasil Dimov)
c5cc3f140c doc: list the I2P accept thread in developer-notes (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Document `i2paccept` in `doc/developer-notes.md` and fix broken URLs to doxygen.bitcoincore.org.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
re-ACK dc02edcba1
Tree-SHA512: 7d396885dd2e8fda2b050aaa25a82b4217ced6a5aa3478339fb892d5392d2b8b6b5997f8bb9acaab7867c0c5bf58bd0b720ef36b335b1e7eb617b8fc205915b0
d3e9a1c71b doc: update for NetBSD 9.2, add GUI Build Instructions (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
**For reviewer:** as I suppose few have a NetBSD system available, I wrote a [guide](https://gist.github.com/jarolrod/385dc063bb02c90aea0cbe8a147fc418#file-netbsd-vm-setup-guide-md) to setup a VM for testing purposes.
This attempts to update the NetBSD docs so one can successfully build on the latest release. It also adds instructions to build the GUI.
Additionally, it includes a note and an example on how one could update the gcc version bundled with NetBSD 9.2 and prior to be able to actually compile. This note can be updated with the release of NetBSD 10, as it will package an acceptable gcc version.
Master: [render](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/build-netbsd.md)
PR: [render](d3e9a1c71b/doc/build-netbsd.md)
Related to #20610, but reworked.
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK d3e9a1c71b.
fanquake:
ACK d3e9a1c71b
Tree-SHA512: fc3c12689cee886f26782c1d57f3b794ceaedc965a571dd06cfc4a57f90393842ad2124e6dba55a12ac9de9bf63d8e3eb4aa541768f2aa8603248175ce7d1c08
4c9666bd73 Mention `mempoolfullrbf` in policy/mempool-replacements.md (Antoine Riard)
aae66ab43d Update getmempoolinfo RPC with `mempoolfullrbf` (Antoine Riard)
3e27e31727 Introduce `mempoolfullrbf` node setting. (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
This is ready for review.
Recent discussions among LN devs have brought back on the surface concerns about the security of multi-party funded transactions against pinnings attacks and other mempool-based nuisances. The lack of full-rbf transaction-relay topology connected to miners open the way to cheap and naive DoS against multi-party funded transactions (e.g coinjoins, dual-funded channels, on-chain DLCs, ...) without solutions introducing an overhead cost or centralization vectors afaik . For more details, see [0].
This PR implements a simple `fullrbf` setting, where the node always allows transaction replacement, ignoring BIP125 opt-in flag. The default value of the setting stays **false**, therefore opt-in replacement is still the default Bitcoin Core replacement policy. Contrary to a previous proposal of mine and listening to feedbacks collected since then [1], I think this new setting simply offers more flexibility in a node transaction-relay policy suiting one's application requirements, without arguing a change of the default behavior.
I [posted](https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-June/020557.html) on the ML to invite operators with a bitcoin application sensitive to full-rbf (e.g dual-funded LN channels service providers) or mempool researchers to join a bootstrapped full-rbf activated peers network for experimentation and learning. If people have strong opinions against the existence of such full-rbf transaction-relay network, I'm proposing to express them on the future thread.
[0] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2021-May/003033.html
[1] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-June/019074.html
Follow-up suggestions :
- soft-enable opt-in RBF in the wallet : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25353#issuecomment-1154918789
- p2p discovery and additional outbound connection to full-rbf peers : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25353#issuecomment-1156044401
- match the code between RPC, wallet and mempool about disregard of inherited signaling : #22698
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK 4c9666bd73
glozow:
ACK 4c9666bd73, a few nits which are non-blocking.
w0xlt:
ACK 4c9666bd73
Tree-SHA512: 9e288bf22e06a9808804e58178444ef1830c3fdd42fd8a7cd7ffb101f8f586e08b000679be407d63ca76a56f7216227b368ff630c81f3fac3243db1a1202ab1c
NetBSD doc has not seen any meaningful contribution since 2018.
This PR intends to update the docs so that one can successfully build on
the latest NetBSD release. It also adds dependency information and
instructions to build the GUI.
No reason to have this here with outdated information. We already point
users to the depends readme, the doc cross builders should be pointed to
, within this doc.
f67b6fce37 Update Arch Linux build example (Igor Bubelov)
Pull request description:
The current build example has two issues:
1. The claim that the wallet functionality will be missing is obsolete since Bitcoin Core can use SQLite, which is a hard dependency of `pacman` so we can assume that it's always present.
2. Installing package groups such as `base-devel` adds some friction and uncertainty by forcing readers to choose which packages they need, interactively. Listing required deps explicitly speeds up the whole process, makes it more transparent and cuts the number of installed packages.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
re-ACK f67b6fce37
Tree-SHA512: c068dac5d244044827d5d94a4b48f239180301b6870dce31b003fa111a69f7e3a483681a7ea2b3d393d6791b40043685ce2fe62c338cce1b7e37a6db0f02b1a2
