8a2b58db9e test: fix segwit terminology (s/witness_program/witness_script/) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes wrong uses of the term "witness program", which according to [BIP141](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0141.mediawiki#Witness_program) is defined as follows:
> A scriptPubKey (or redeemScript as defined in BIP16/P2SH) that consists of a 1-byte push opcode (for 0 to 16) followed by a data push between 2 and 40 bytes gets a new special meaning. The value of the first push is called the "version byte". **The following byte vector pushed is called the "witness program".**
In most cases where "witness program" is used in tests (concerns comments, variable names and in one instance even a function name) what we really want to denote is the "witness script". Thanks to [MarcoFalke for pointing this out in a review comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22363#discussion_r666794261)!
Some historical background: At the time when the P2P segwit tests were first introduced (commit 330b0f31ee, PR #8149), the term "witness program" was not used consistently in BIP141: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/46451/what-is-the-precise-definition-of-witness-program
This was fixed in PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/416 later.
So in some way, this PR can be seen as a very late follow-up to the BIP141 fix that also reflects these changes in the tests.
ACKs for top commit:
josibake:
tACK 8a2b58db9e
Tree-SHA512: f36bb9e53d1b54b86bfa87ec12f33e3ebca64b5f59d97e9662fe35ba12c25e1c9a4f93a5425d0eaa3879dce9e50368d345555b927bfab76945511f873396892b
bdb8b9a347 test: doc: improve doc for `from_hex` helper (mention `to_hex` alternative) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
1914054208 scripted-diff: test: rename `FromHex` to `from_hex` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a79396fe5f test: remove `ToHex` helper, use .serialize().hex() instead (Sebastian Falbesoner)
2ce7b47958 test: introduce `tx_from_hex` helper for tx deserialization (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
There are still many functional tests that perform conversions from a hex-string to a message object (deserialization) manually. This PR identifies all those instances and replaces them with a newly introduced helper `tx_from_hex`.
Instances were found via
* `git grep "deserialize.*BytesIO"`
and some of them manually, when it were not one-liners.
Further, the helper `ToHex` was removed and simply replaced by `.serialize().hex()`, since now both variants are in use (sometimes even within the same test) and using the helper doesn't really have an advantage in readability. (see discussion https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22257#discussion_r652404782)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review re-ACK bdb8b9a347😁
Tree-SHA512: e25d7dc85918de1d6755a5cea65471b07a743204c20ad1c2f71ff07ef48cc1b9ad3fe5f515c1efaba2b2e3d89384e7980380c5d81895f9826e2046808cd3266e
Without the fix a hex-string can not be parsed:
File "./test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py", line 82, in create_block
txo.deserialize(io.BytesIO(tx))
TypeError: a bytes-like object is required, not 'str'
Also, remove io import and repace it with our FromHex() helper
Create and import the multisig into a separate watchonly wallet so that
feature_nulldummy.py works with descriptor wallets.
blocktools.create_raw_transaction is also updated to use multiple nodes
and wallets and to use PSBT so that this test passes.
d438d609cd QA: Use GBT to get block versions correct (Luke Dashjr)
1df2cd1c8f QA: blocktools: Accept block template to create_block (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
The goal here is to decouple unrelated tests from the details of block versions.
Currently, these tests are forcing specific versions of blocks for no real reason.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK d438d609cd
benthecarman:
ACK d438d60
Tree-SHA512: 523b1cd4dac8d65c88432e126ce7f60df96ca4b94f7ecc8e83ba4ffbade23e2afe7055fdf586ce3c195a533f2004e63fff83add4267b39473a581c9f1c6d5340
A large functional test is added that automatically generates random transactions which
exercise various aspects of the new rules, and verifies they are accepted into the mempool
(when appropriate), and correctly accepted/rejected in (Python-constructed) blocks.
Includes sighashing code and many tests by Johnson Lau.
Includes a test by Matthew Zipkin.
Includes several tests and improvements by Greg Sanders.
Migrates the CScriptNum decode tests into a unit test, and moved some
changes made in #14816. Made possible by the integration of
test_framework unit testing in #18576. Further extends the original
test with larger ints, similar to the scriptnum_tests.cpp file. Adds
test to blocktools.py testing fn create_coinbase() with CScriptNum
decode.
fab17e8272 test: Add basic test for BIP34 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
BIP34 was disabled for testing, which explains why it had no test.
Fix that by enabling it and adding a test.
Tree-SHA512: 9cb5702d474117ce6420226eb93ee09d6fb5fc856fabc8b67abe56a088cd727674e0e5462000e1afa83b911374036f90abdbdde56a8c236a75572ed47e10a00f
Change all instances of validateaddress to getaddressinfo since it seems that
no test actually uses validateaddress for actually validating addresses.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
find ./test/functional -path '*py' -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_disable.py -not -path ./test/functional/rpc_deprecated.py -not -path ./test/functional/wallet_address_types.py -exec sed -i'' -e 's/validateaddress/getaddressinfo/g' {} \;
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
5fecd84 [tests] Remove redundant import in blocktools.py test (Anthony Towns)
9b20bb4 [tests] Check tests conform to naming convention (Anthony Towns)
7250b4e [tests] README.md nit fixes (Anthony Towns)
82b2712 [tests] move witness util functions to blocktools.py (John Newbery)
1e10854 [tests] [docs] update README for new test naming scheme (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Splitting #11774 into two parts -- this part updates the README with the proposed naming convention, and adds some checks to test_runner.py that the number of tests violating the naming convention doesn't increase too much. Idea is this part of the change should not introduce merge conflicts or require much rebasing, so reviews of the complicated bits won't become invalidated too often; while the second part will just be file renames, which will require regular rebasing and will introduce merge conflicts with pending PRs, but can be merged later, and should also be much easier to review, since it will only include relatively trivial changes.
Tree-SHA512: b96557d41714addbbfe2aed62fb5a48639eaeb1eb3aba30ac1b3a86bb3cb8d796c6247f9c414c4695c4bf54c0ec9968ac88e2f88fb62483bc1a2f89368f7fc80
