The code before the fix only checked the length of R value of the last
signature in the loop, and only for equality (but the length can be
less than 32)
The fixed code checks that length of the R value is less than or equal
to 32 on each iteration of the loop
The BOOST_CHECK(sig.size() <= 70) is merged with sig[3] <= 32 check,
and BOOST_CHECKs are moved outside the loop, for efficiency
fabecce719 net: Treat raw message bytes as uint8_t (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Using `uint8_t` from the beginning when messages are `recv`ed has two style benefits:
* The signedness is clear from reading the code, as it does not depend on the architecture
* When passing the bytes on, the need for static signedness casts is dropped, making the code a bit less verbose and more coherent
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fabecce719
theStack:
Code Review ACK fabecce719
jonatack:
Tested ACK fabecce719
Tree-SHA512: e6d9803c78633fde3304faf592afa961ff9462a7912d1da97a24720265274aa10ab4168d71b6ec2756b7448dd42585321afee0e5c889e705be778ce9a330d145
8f7b930475 Drop the leading 0 from the version number (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Removes the leading 0 from the version number. The minor version, which we had been using as the major version, is now the major version. The revision, which we had been using as the minor version, is now the minor version. The revision number is dropped. The build number is promoted to being part of the version number. This also avoids issues where it was accidentally not included in the version number.
The CLIENT_VERSION remains the same format as previous as previously, as the Major version was 0 so it never actually got included in it.
The user agent string formatter is updated to follow this new versioning.
***
Honestly I'm just tired of all of the people asking for "1.0" that maybe this'll shut them up. Skip the whole 1.0 thing and go straight to version 22.0!
Also, this means that the terminology we commonly use lines up with how the variables are named. So major versions are actually bumping the major version number, etc.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 8f7b930475
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 8f7b930475🎻
Tree-SHA512: b5c3fae14d4c0a9c0ab3b1db7c949ecc0ac3537646306b13d98dd0efc17c489cdd16d43f0a24aaa28e9c4a92ea360500e05480a335b03f9fb308010cdd93a436
fa5ed3b4ca net: Use Span in ReceiveMsgBytes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Pass a data pointer and a size as span in `ReceiveMsgBytes` to get the benefits of a span
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK fa5ed3b4ca code review, rebased to current master 12a1c3ad1a, debug build, unit tests, ran bitcoind/-netinfo/getpeerinfo
theStack:
ACK fa5ed3b4ca
Tree-SHA512: 89bf111323148d6e6e50185ad20ab39f73ab3a58a27e46319e3a08bcf5dcf9d6aa84faff0fd6afb90cb892ac2f557a237c144560986063bc736a69ace353ab9d
ecc6cf1a3b test: fix creation of std::string objects with \0s (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
A string literal `"abc"` contains a terminating `\0`, so that is 4
bytes. There is no need to write `"abc\0"` unless two terminating
`\0`s are necessary.
`std::string` objects do not internally contain a terminating `\0`, so
`std::string("abc")` creates a string with size 3 and is the same as
`std::string("abc", 3)`.
In `"\01"` the `01` part is interpreted as one number (1) and that is
the same as `"\1"` which is a string like `{1, 0}` whereas `"\0z"` is a
string like `{0, 'z', 0}`. To create a string like `{0, '1', 0}` one
must use `"\0" "1"`.
Adjust the tests accordingly.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK ecc6cf1a3b
practicalswift:
ACK ecc6cf1a3b modulo happily green CI
Tree-SHA512: 5eb489e8533a4199a9324b92f7280041552379731ebf7dfee169f70d5458e20e29b36f8bfaee6f201f48ab2b9d1d0fc4bdf8d6e4c58d6102f399cfbea54a219e
Removes the leading 0 from the version number. The minor version, which
we had been using as the major version, is now the major version. The
revision, which we had been using as the minor version, is now the minor
version. The revision number is dropped. The build number is promoted to
being part of the version number. This also avoids issues where it was
accidentally not included in the version number.
The CLIENT_VERSION remains the same format as previous as previously,
the Major version was 0 so that was never a factor in CLIENT_VERSION.
05e82d86b0 wallet: override minfee checks (fOverrideFeeRate) for fee_rate (Jon Atack)
9a670b4f07 wallet: update sendtoaddress, send RPC examples with fee_rate (Jon Atack)
be481b72e2 wallet: use MIN_RELAY_TX_FEE in bumpfee help (Jon Atack)
449b730579 wallet: provide valid values if invalid estimate mode passed (Jon Atack)
6da3afbaee wallet: update remaining rpcwallet fee rate units to BTC/kvB (Jon Atack)
173b5b5fe0 wallet: update fee rate units, use sat/vB for fee_rate error messages (Jon Atack)
7f9835a05a wallet: remove fee rates from conf_target helps (Jon Atack)
b7994c01e9 wallet: add fee_rate unit warnings to bumpfee (Jon Atack)
410e471fa4 wallet: remove redundant bumpfee fee_rate checks (Jon Atack)
a0d4957473 wallet: introduce fee_rate (sat/vB) param/option (Jon Atack)
e21212f01b wallet: remove unneeded WALLET_BTC_KB_TO_SAT_B constant (Jon Atack)
6112cf20d4 wallet: add CFeeRate ctor doxygen documentation (Jon Atack)
3f72791613 wallet: fix bug in RPC send options (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR builds on #11413 and #20220 to address #19543.
- replace overloading the conf_target and estimate_mode params with `fee_rate` in sat/vB in the sendtoaddress, sendmany, send, fundrawtransaction, walletcreatefundedpsbt, and bumpfee RPCs
- allow non-actionable conf_target value of `0` and estimate_mode value of `""` to be passed to use `fee_rate` as a positional argument, in addition to as a named argument
- fix a bug in the experimental send RPC described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20220#discussion_r513789526 where args were not being passed correctly into the options values
- update the feerate error message units for these RPCs from BTC/kB to sat/vB
- update the test coverage, help docs, doxygen docs, and some of the RPC examples
- other changes to address the excellent review feedback
See this wallet meeting log for more context: http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2020-11-06.html#l-309
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 05e82d8
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 05e82d86b0 did not test and found a few style nits, which can be fixed later 🍯
Xekyo:
tACK 05e82d86b0
Sjors:
utACK 05e82d86b0
Tree-SHA512: a4ee5f184ada53f1840b2923d25873bda88c5a2ae48e67eeea2417a0b35154798cfdb3c147b05dd56bd6608a784e1b91623bb985ee2ab9ef2baaec22206d0a9c
79ef8324d4 tests: Add fuzzing harness for CConnman (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add fuzzing harness for `CConnman`.
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 79ef8324d4
Tree-SHA512: eb9ffae20e939b818f8b9def064544b9a8fcd127ca22d1a54af1afedf1d24143be42419f3a03d684be59a5ff07b29d8bfa34ef2aaf1d9f9f75c4c1aaa90a29a8
fa4234d877 test: Mock IBD in net_processing fuzzers (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Without this the fuzzers fail to detect trivial crasher bugs, such as https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20317#issuecomment-723047111
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
Tested ACK fa4234d877
Tree-SHA512: ce5da5c0a604b7559805a98ffdde882b44ca4f91b003b493d6e1be230714ce4cccb11dbfc1fc175f9d8fc779551c0a4103ceb4b473552928207d7d78ae329e10
d7901ab8d2 fuzz: Assert expected DecodeHexTx behaviour when using legacy decoding (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Assert expected `DecodeHexTx` behaviour when using legacy decoding.
As suggested by MarcoFalke in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20290#issuecomment-720989597.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK d7901ab8d2
Tree-SHA512: 3285680059e6fa73b0fb2c52b775f6319de1ac616f731206662b742764dc888cdfd1ac1f1fcfdfd5418d2006475a852d1c1a56a7035f772f0a6b2a84f5de93bc
5cafe2b25c fuzz: Add missing ECC_Start to descriptor_parse test (Ivan Metlushko)
Pull request description:
Fixes fuzzing harness.
I also observed that the corpus for this test consists only of `xprv...` keys while we are using regtest parameters. So for proper fuzzing we need either A) to update the corpus and replace `xprv...` with `tprv...` B) switch to main net in the test
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 5cafe2b25c
practicalswift:
Tested ACK 5cafe2b25c
Tree-SHA512: 7415a98a445ce0f96219637d2362fecfc1191ad104f55d79ca92b0c92cde165e00646be5bf3fda956385e3cb22540eca457e575048493367cdf0e00a27d7cdb8
fa3967efdb test: Replace ARRAYLEN with C++11 ranged for loop (MarcoFalke)
fafc529053 test: Run AssetTest even if built --with-libs=no (MarcoFalke)
faf58ab139 ci: Add --with-libs=no to one ci config (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`script_assets_test` doesn't call libbitcoinconsensus, so it seems confusing to require it
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa3967efdb - looks ok to me.
Tree-SHA512: 8744fef64c5d7dc19a0ef4ae9b3df5b3f356253bf000f12723064794c5e50df071824d436059985f1112d94c1b530b65cbeb6b8435114a91b195480620eafc59
c2cf8a18c2 fuzz: Check for addrv1 compatibility before using addrv1 serializer on CService (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Check for addrv1 compatibility before using addrv1 serializer/deserializer on `CService`:
Before this patch:
```
$ src/test/fuzz/service_deserialize
service_deserialize: test/fuzz/deserialize.cpp:85:
void (anonymous namespace)::AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(const T &, const int) [T = CService]:
Assertion `Deserialize<T>(Serialize(obj, version)) == obj' failed.
```
After this patch:
```
$ src/test/fuzz/service_deserialize
…
```
Related change: #20247
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK c2cf8a18c2
Tree-SHA512: dba6ddc60e8ef621011d844281461f1741de08c4af1a2b7156c810af44306cef7ec582de5974752db02ca085cfd23da0296d70b694e59ee262589d829fa0626e
16d9bfc417 Avoid test-before-evict evictions of current peers (Suhas Daftuar)
e8b215a086 Refactor test for existing peer connection into own function (Suhas Daftuar)
4fe338ab3e Call CAddrMan::Good() on block-relay-only peer addresses (Suhas Daftuar)
daf5553126 Avoid calling CAddrMan::Connected() on block-relay-only peer addresses (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
This PR does two things:
* Block-relay-only interaction with addrman.
* Calling `CAddrMan::Connected()` on an address that was a block-relay-only peer causes the time we report in `addr` messages containing that peer to be updated; particularly now that we use anchor connections with a our block-relay-only peers, this risks leaking information about those peers. So, stop this.
* Avoiding calling `CAddrMan::Good()` on block-relay-only peer addresses causes the addrman logic around maintaining the new and tried table to be less good, and in particular makes it so that block-relay-only peer addresses are more likely to be evicted from the addrman (for no good reason I can think of). So, mark those addresses as good when we connect.
* Fix test-before-evict bug. There's a bug where if we get a collision in the tried table with an existing address that is one of our current peers, and the connection is long-lived enough, then `SelectTriedCollisions()` might return that existing peer address to us as a test-before-evict connection candidate. However, our logic for new outbound connections would later prevent us from actually making a connection; the result would be that when we get a collision with a long-lived current peer, that peer's address is likely to get evicted from the tried table. Fix this by checking to see if a test-before-evict candidate is a peer we're currently connected to, and if so, mark it as `Good()`.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 16d9bfc417
amitiuttarwar:
code review ACK 16d9bfc417
mzumsande:
Code-Review ACK 16d9bfc417.
jnewbery:
utACK 16d9bfc417
ariard:
Code Review ACK 16d9bfc.
jonatack:
Tested ACK 16d9bfc417
Tree-SHA512: 188ccb814e436937cbb91d29d73c316ce83f4b9c22f1cda56747f0949a093e10161ae724e87e4a2d85ac40f85f5f6b4e87e97d350a1ac44f80c57783f4423324
3d0556d410 Increase feature_taproot inactive test coverage (Pieter Wuille)
525cbd425e Only relay Taproot spends if next block has it active (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
There should be no change to mempool transaction behavior for witness v1 transactions as long as no activation is defined. Until that point, we should treat the consensus rules as under debate, and for soft-fork safety, that means spends should be treated as non-standard.
It's possible to go further: don't relay them unless the consensus rules are actually active for the next block. This extends non-relay to the period where a deployment is defined, started, locked in, or failed. I see no downsides to this, and the code change is very simple.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK 3d0556d410
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 3d0556d410🏓
jnewbery:
utACK 3d0556d410
Tree-SHA512: ca625a2981716b4b44e8f3722718fd25fd04e25bf3ca1684924b8974fca49f7c1d438fdd9dcdfbc091a442002e20d441d42c41a0e2096e74a61068da6c60267a
ad5cef5dfd doc: Update data directory path comments (Hennadii Stepanov)
b19e88230f util: Add StripRedundantLastElementsOfPath function (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Wallet names in `listwalletdir` RPC are correct now, even if the `-datadir` path has any number of trailing `/`.
This PR is an alternative to #19933.
Fixes#19928.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK ad5cef5dfd🔙
promag:
Code review ACK ad5cef5dfd.
meshcollider:
Code review + test run ACK ad5cef5dfd
Tree-SHA512: bccabbd6c18243d48d15b2b27201cc0f5984623dcbc635c8740cf74523f359844c36eadd40391142874fcf452a43880bb6afbf89815ae736e499f9a98143a661
A string literal `"abc"` contains a terminating `\0`, so that is 4
bytes. There is no need to write `"abc\0"` unless two terminating
`\0`s are necessary.
`std::string` objects do not internally contain a terminating `\0`, so
`std::string("abc")` creates a string with size 3 and is the same as
`std::string("abc", 3)`.
In `"\01"` the `01` part is interpreted as one number (1) and that is
the same as `"\1"` which is a string like `{1, 0}` whereas `"\0z"` is a
string like `{0, 'z', 0}`. To create a string like `{0, '1', 0}` one
must use `"\0" "1"`.
Adjust the tests accordingly.
Since m_check_ratio is only set once and since the CTxMemPool object is
no longer a global variable, m_check_ratio can be passed into the
constructor of CTxMemPool. Since it is only read from after
initialization, m_check_ratio can also be made a const and hence no
longer needs to be guarded by the cs mutex.
