fad140e311 test: Set correct nValue for multi-op-return policy check (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`CTxOut::nValue` is default-initialized to `-1`. The dust-threshold for `OP_RETURN` outputs is `0`. Thus, the policy failure would be `dust` instead of `multi-op-return`. The test only passes because the dust check is currently not run.
Avoid that confusion by setting the value to `0`, to ensure the dust check passes.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK fad140e311
Tree-SHA512: f0c7a68eb2c573d6595b2b129fa8fa2a34fa35c17691f448bf1c54ccf66059c37562e7480cde7b51c4de677038d7717873da4257147a5f60acc8bbcd25fb7e3f
efaf80e9bb fuzz: check that certain script TxoutType are nonstandard (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
- Every transaction of type NONSTANDARD must not be a standard script
- The only know types of nonstandard scripts are NONSTANDARD and certain NULL_DATA and MULTISIG scripts
When reviewing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20761 I figured this is very similar and might also be good to have
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK efaf80e9bb
Tree-SHA512: 6f563ee3104ea9d2633aad95f1d003474bea759d0f22636c37aa91b5536a6ff0800c42447285ca8ed12f1b3699bf781dae1e5e0a3362da578749cd3164a06ea4
86c495223f net: add CNode::IsInboundOnion() public getter and unit tests (Jon Atack)
6609eb8cb5 net: assert CNode::m_inbound_onion is inbound in ctor (Jon Atack)
993d1ecd19 test, fuzz: fix constructing CNode with invalid inbound_onion (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
The goal of this PR is to be able to depend on `m_inbound_onion` in AttemptToEvictConnection in #20197:
- asserts `CNode::m_inbound_onion` is inbound in the CNode ctor to have a validity check at the class boundary
- fixes a unit test and a fuzz utility that were passing invalid inbound onion values to the CNode ctor
- drops an unneeded check in `CNode::ConnectedThroughNetwork()` for its inbound status
- adds a public getter `IsInboundOnion()` that also allows unit testing it
- adds unit test coverage
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 86c495223f
LarryRuane:
ACK 86c495223f
vasild:
ACK 86c495223f
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 86c495223f🐍
Tree-SHA512: 21109105bc4e5e03076fadd489204be00eac710c9de0127708ca2d0a10a048ff81f640f589a7429967ac3eb51d35fe24bb2b12e53e7aa3efbc47aaff6396d204
fa0074e2d8 scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Needs to be done because no one has removed the years yet
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa0074e2d8
Tree-SHA512: 210e92acd7d400b556cf8259c3ec9967797420cfd19f0c2a4fa54cb2b3d32ad9ae27e771269201e7d554c0f4cd73a8b1c1a42c9f65d8685ca4d52e5134b071a3
4ddbcd0d9a fuzz: Add coverage for CDataStream consumer (practicalswift)
546a0764f3 fuzz: Fill various small fuzzing gaps (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Fill various small fuzzing gaps.
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 4ddbcd0d9a
Tree-SHA512: d20f2cc0172f39948673846d088121782f39b4556df8b38fa14859cfa062c1519d18ee9601d4503ef1ba9613976cc5349c1fc0f0b9601a3d68127ffce1b1854e
5a9ee0869b tests: Add fuzzing harness for node eviction logic (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add fuzzing harness for node eviction logic.
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 5a9ee0869b
Tree-SHA512: c2401d22134867e23dab1ba94ae7ef36fdf52aa0588fdc4705d9cb765ddf979fd775fdf153ce2359f1bc1787cf60bf0ebcd47c7aa29c672e6a253fa58cac292d
Upstream revision: 6d0488f75b/compiler-rt/include/fuzzer/FuzzedDataProvider.h
Changes:
* [compiler-rt] FuzzedDataProvider: add ConsumeData and method.
* [compiler-rt] Fix a typo in a comment in FuzzedDataProvider.h.
* [compiler-rt] Add ConsumeRandomLengthString() version without arguments.
* [compiler-rt] Refactor FuzzedDataProvider for better readability.
* [compiler-rt] FuzzedDataProvider: make linter happy.
* [compiler-rt] Mark FDP non-template methods inline to avoid ODR violations.
89895773b7 Fix length of R check in test/key_tests.cpp:key_signature_tests (Dmitry Petukhov)
Pull request description:
The code before the fix only checked the length of R value of the last
signature in the loop, and only for equality (but the length can be
less than 32)
The fixed code checks that length of the R value is less than or equal
to 32 on each iteration of the loop
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 89895773b7
Tree-SHA512: 73eb2bb4a6c1c5fc11dd16851b28b43037ac06ef8cfc3b1f957429a1fca295c9422d67ec6c73c0e4bb4919f92e22dc5d733e84840b0d01ad1a529aa20d906ebf
fa13e1b0c5 build: Add option --enable-danger-fuzz-link-all (MarcoFalke)
44444ba759 fuzz: Link all targets once (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the linker is invoked more than 150 times when compiling with `--enable-fuzz`. This is problematic for several reasons:
* It wastes disk space north of 20 GB, as all libraries and sanitizers are linked more than 150 times
* It wastes CPU time, as the link step can practically not be cached (similar to ccache for object files)
* It makes it a blocker to compile the fuzz tests by default for non-fuzz builds #19388, for the aforementioned reasons
* The build file is several thousand lines of code, without doing anything meaningful except listing each fuzz target in a highly verbose manner
* It makes writing new fuzz tests unnecessarily hard, as build system knowledge is required; Compare that to boost unit tests, which can be added by simply editing an existing cpp file
* It encourages fuzz tests that re-use the `buffer` or assume the `buffer` to be concatenations of seeds, which increases complexity of seeds and complexity for the fuzz engine to explore; Thus reducing the effectiveness of the affected fuzz targets
Fixes#20088
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
Tested ACK fa13e1b0c5
sipa:
ACK fa13e1b0c5. Reviewed the code changes, and tested the 3 different test_runner.py modes (run once, merge, generate). I also tested building with the new --enable-danger-fuzz-link-all
Tree-SHA512: 962ab33269ebd51810924c51266ecc62edd6ddf2fcd9a8c359ed906766f58c3f73c223f8d3cc49f2c60f0053f65e8bdd86ce9c19e673f8c2b3cd676e913f2642
f7264fff0a Check if Cjdns address is valid (Lucas Ontivero)
Pull request description:
CJDNS addresses start with 0xFC and for that reason if a netaddr was unserialized with network type cjdns but its address prefix is not 0xFC then that netaddr should be considered invalid.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK f7264fff0a
practicalswift:
cr ACK f7264fff0a: patch looks correct
theStack:
ACK f7264fff0a✔️
Tree-SHA512: 5300df2ffbbd69c40271b6d8df96cca98eb3e1ee76aba62c9c76025d083788ab1f1332775890c63b06e02ca593863a867cd53956bce5962383e8450487898669
8c09c0c1d1 fuzz: Avoid time-based "non-determinism" in fuzzing harnesses by using mocked GetTime() (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Avoid time-based "non-determinism" in fuzzing harnesses by using mocked `GetTime()`.
Prior to this commit the fuzzing harnesses `banman`, `connman`, `net` and `rbf` had time-based "non-determinism". `addrman` is fixed in #20425. `process_message` and `process_messages` are left to fix: simply using mock time is not enough for them due to interaction with `IsInitialBlockDownload()`.
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 8c09c0c1d1
practicalswift:
> review ACK [8c09c0c](8c09c0c1d1)
Tree-SHA512: 32dfbead3dfd18cf4ff56dc2ea341aa977441b4e19a54879cf54fa5820c7e2b14b92c7e238d32fd785654f3b28cc82826ae66c03e94c292633c63c41196ba9a8
fac39c1983 wallet: document that tx in CreateTransaction is purely an out-param (MarcoFalke)
faac31521b Remove unused and confusing CTransaction constructor (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The constructor is confusing and dangerous (as explained in the TODO), fix that by removing it.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fac39c1983
promag:
Code review ACK fac39c1983.
theStack:
Code review ACK fac39c1983
Tree-SHA512: e0c8cffce8d8ee0166b8e1cbfe85ed0657611e26e2af0d69fde70eceaa5d75cbde3eb489af0428fe4fc431360b4c791fb1cc21b8dee7d4c7a4f17df00836229d
b3a515c0be Clarify comments around outbound peer eviction (Suhas Daftuar)
daffaf03fb Periodically make block-relay connections and sync headers (Suhas Daftuar)
3cc8a7a0f5 Use conn_type to identify block-relay peers, rather than m_tx_relay == nullptr (Suhas Daftuar)
91d61952a8 Simplify and clarify extra outbound peer counting (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
To make eclipse attacks more difficult, regularly initiate outbound connections
and stay connected long enough to sync headers and potentially learn of new
blocks. If we learn a new block, rotate out an existing block-relay peer in
favor of the new peer.
This augments the existing outbound peer rotation that exists -- currently we
make new full-relay connections when our tip is stale, which we disconnect
after waiting a small time to see if we learn a new block. As block-relay
connections use minimal bandwidth, we can make these connections regularly and
not just when our tip is stale.
Like feeler connections, these connections are not aggressive; whenever our
timer fires (once every 5 minutes on average), we'll try to initiate a new
block-relay connection as described, but if we fail to connect we just wait for
our timer to fire again before repeating with a new peer.
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
Code Review ACK b3a515c, only change since last time is dropping a useless `cs_main` taking. I manually tested a previous version of the PR, and not substantial change has been introduced since then which would alter behavior IMO.
jonatack:
Tested ACK b3a515c0be over several weeks, though this change and behavior could benefit from test coverage and other follow-ups (refactoring, etc.) described in the review feedback. I did not verify the behavior of `m_start_extra_block_relay_peers` only being enabled after initial chain sync. Since my last review, one unneeded `cs_main` lock was removed.
Tree-SHA512: 75fc6f8e8003e88e93f86b845caf2d30b8b9c0dbb0a6b8aabe4e24ea4f6327351f736a068a3b2720a8a581b789942a3a47f921e2afdb47e88bc50d078aa37b6f
