7d07192dde Add src/qt/android/.gitignore (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR makes `git` ignore files created by `make apk`.
ACKs for top commit:
icota:
ACK 7d07192dde
Tree-SHA512: 4be20bd84830217a10d8ea7634799e71ed50be73f4f60c91c56311a2c95b22ff1f28d3b7bc077f1417318bb75e446e3fc3bdbf9dbc037b4cbc8428f0875f2c77
7e2a9890e5 depends: latest config.sub (2021-04-30) (fanquake)
f16d4cd8c5 depends: latest config.guess (2021-05-24) (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This is split out of #21851. Updating these files should be mechanical, and shouldn't have to wait for that PR. Also, having support in depends for the new `arm-apple-darwin` target (added in [2593751ef276497e312d7c4ce7fd049614c7bf80](https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/config.git/commit/?id=2593751ef276497e312d7c4ce7fd049614c7bf80)) is useful when debugging. i.e #22070.
If you try and compile depends for a `arm-apple-darwin` target using master, on a x86_64 darwin machine, currently you'll get:
```bash
gmake -C depends -j9 HOST=arm64-apple-darwin
Invalid configuration `arm64-apple-darwin': machine `arm64-apple' not recognized
shasum: hosts/.mk: No such file or directory
<omitted>
Makefile:111: hosts/.mk: No such file or directory
gmake: *** No rule to make target 'hosts/.mk'. Stop.
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 7e2a9890e5
Tree-SHA512: 8ed99b5d486c6cbca8929a752460338b6ee17f6bf93013c76589605678853c3a01ebd631b4d3f5d6aaeb6e5c21b7bbe39afc4454d3a697fafb27678f6d2c021e
13650fe2e5 [policy] detect unsorted packages (glozow)
9ef643e21b [doc] add release note for package testmempoolaccept (glozow)
c4259f4b7e [test] functional test for packages in RPCs (glozow)
9ede34a6f2 [rpc] allow multiple txns in testmempoolaccept (glozow)
ae8e6df709 [policy] limit package sizes (glozow)
c9e1a26d1f [fuzz] add ProcessNewPackage call in tx_pool fuzzer (glozow)
363e3d916c [test] unit tests for ProcessNewPackage (glozow)
cd9a11ac96 [test] make submit optional in CreateValidMempoolTransaction (glozow)
2ef187941d [validation] package validation for test accepts (glozow)
578148ded6 [validation] explicit Success/Failure ctors for MempoolAcceptResult (glozow)
b88d77aec5 [policy] Define packages (glozow)
249f43f3cc [refactor] add option to disable RBF (glozow)
897e348f59 [coins/mempool] extend CCoinsViewMemPool to track temporary coins (glozow)
42cf8b25df [validation] make CheckSequenceLocks context-free (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR enables validation dry-runs of packages through the `testmempoolaccept` RPC. The expectation is that the results returned from `testmempoolaccept` are what you'd get from test-then-submitting each transaction individually, in that order (this means the package is expected to be sorted in topological order, for now at least). The validation is also atomic: in the case of failure, it immediately halts and may return "unfinished" `MempoolAcceptResult`s for transactions that weren't fully validated. The API for 1 transaction stays the same.
**Motivation:**
- This allows you to test validity for transaction chains (e.g. with multiple spending paths and where you don't want to broadcast yet); closes#18480.
- It's also a first step towards package validation in a minimally invasive way.
- The RPC commit happens to close#21074 by clarifying the "allowed" key.
There are a few added restrictions on the packages, mostly to simplify the logic for areas that aren't critical to main package use cases:
- No package can have conflicts, i.e. none of them can spend the same inputs, even if it would be a valid BIP125 replacement.
- The package cannot conflict with the mempool, i.e. RBF is disabled.
- The total count of the package cannot exceed 25 (the default descendant count limit), and total size cannot exceed 101KvB (the default descendant size limit).
If you're looking for review comments and github isn't loading them, I have a gist compiling some topics of discussion [here](https://gist.github.com/glozow/c3acaf161c95bba491fce31585b2aaf7)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK 13650fe2e5
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 13650fe2e5
ariard:
ACK 13650fe
Tree-SHA512: 8c5cbfa91a6c714e1c8710bb281d5ff1c5af36741872a7c5df6b24874d6272b4a09f816cb8a4c7de33ef8e1c2a2c252c0df5105b7802f70bc6ff821ed7cc1a2f
167fb1fc72 Update Windows code signing certificate (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Updates the Windows code signing certificate to a new one issued by Digicert. This certificate has been issued to Bitcoin Core Code Signing LLC registered in Delaware, US. Note that this is different from the previous Bitcoin Core Code Signing Association registered in Zurich, Switzerland as it was unable to meet the validation requirements in time.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK 167fb1f
laanwj:
ACK 167fb1fc72
Tree-SHA512: 8d5308c710ef94330417955b9bc82c5894d282798cebece82b84b425e3354e566aa6a68693ec359391ea40ddd7e2032d35ce28d104683d75ec3010ddf00be209
Pass in chainman instead of prev_block so that we can enforce the
block.hashPrevBlock refers to prev_block invariant in the function
itself.
We should probably rethink BlockAssembler's API and somehow include
commitment regeneration functionality in there. Something like a variant
of CreateNewBlock that takes in a std::vector<TxRef> and return a CBlock
instead of CBlockTemplate. That could avoid reaching for
LookupBlockIndex at all.
This is not the cleanest change but:
1. It fixes the erroneous use of RPC's Ensure*() in rest.cpp, which
cause crashes in REST contexts.
RPC code wraps all calls in a try/except, REST code does not.
Ensure*(), being part of RPC, expects that its throw's will get
caught by a try/except. But if you use Ensure*() in REST code, since
it doesn't have a try/except wrap, a crash will happen.
2. It is consistent with other functions like GetMemPool.
Someone can probably make this a bit prettier.
8caf60dbbe move-only: Group and re-order CAddrMan members by access type (Hennadii Stepanov)
5cd7f8abe3 refactor: Do not expose CAddrMan members as protected without need (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR is split from #19238 as all of its commits are trivial to review.
The last commit is easy to review with `git diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`.
Addressed the following comments from #19238:
- 130b82ff35 (r550865131)
> Can you consolidate all the private members and protected members to be next to each other? Multiple private and protected access specifiers make this harder to read than is necessary.
- 130b82ff35 (r557271783)
> Yeah, class declaration is easier to read if there is just one instance of `public:`, `protected:` and `private:` (in that order).
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK 8caf60dbbe
laanwj:
Code review ACK 8caf60dbbe
jarolrod:
ACK 8caf60dbbe
vasild:
ACK 8caf60dbbe
Tree-SHA512: e6127fc658da7876e36f22e2fae162dc19502ed7f8e931fdebc827dabd627e5346c6fbe6f6d0cd27fd3e5c96690ff35022ff6b48f2747b748ebd66a45c851c2b
df4c81fda4 English translations update (Hennadii Stepanov)
bfb53ddda9 scripted-diff: Fix ellipsis after pr20773 (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Update for Transifex.
After changing translator comments in #332 this update will show if Transifex triggers strings to be re-translated.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK df4c81fda4
jarolrod:
ACK df4c81fda4
Tree-SHA512: 1e54812bc04db6ae39e0b4d735b220ed8730a9941b17a0a2d09e21bcdd08e829adba86c35cf43c9be5e492ccb13e53a90149fcd7d6c0f5fdd022b978a1ff785c
cb7eba2a57 build: Use Qt archive of the same version as the compiled binaries (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes broken Android APK build when the `depends/sources` directory contains Qt source archives of different versions (e.g., Qt version update [pull request](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22054) in CI with the cached `depends/sources` directory).
This is an alternative to #22058.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK cb7eba2a57
laanwj:
Code review ACK cb7eba2a57
Tree-SHA512: cf63a9809fba5cb13719d7e7bb5afc718a2cff5233b0670d30d30a0018d91278fcfc2a1b9ae8b84e8e3a52c95157bc465603cc754bb8a9d1a3d62415f01ad70f
6fe0516858 contrib: add torv3 seed nodes for testnet, drop v2 ones (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Replace the ancient (2015) Tor V2 hardcoded seeds with new Tor V3 ones. This needs to be done before 0.22 to make sure onion-only testnet nodes can still connect to the network. Continues #21560.
Ways to test:
- Re-generate ` src/chainparamsseeds.h` with `cd contrib/seeds && python3 generate-seeds.py . > ../../src/chainparamsseeds.h`, check if git tree stays the same.
- Create a new testnet node with `bitcoind -testnet -onlynet=onion -proxy=127.0.0.1:9050` (or delete `~/.bitcoin/testnet3/peers.dat`), check if it is able to connect to the network and get blocks.
- Check if the addresses are connectable for ex.:
```python3
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import subprocess
with open('contrib/seeds/nodes_test.txt') as f:
for line in (line for line in (line.rstrip().split('#', 1)[0] for line in f) if line):
subprocess.call(["nc", "-v", "-x", "127.0.0.1:9050", "-z"] + line.split(':'))
```
Thanks to jonatack for providing the list.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 6fe0516858
Tree-SHA512: 61bfdb44dfab9d02b75e5cb06c089a3b1a1fe7134875e1d09166c4116e961d809aa25422fe03f068876e9423b571ecc4a0c7a7eeacba4aac3b2768717f3ee6d6
a02c970eb0 qt, refactor: Revert explicit including QStringBuilder (Hennadii Stepanov)
3fd3a0fc87 qt, build: Optimize string concatenation (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
From [Qt docs](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qstring.html#more-efficient-string-construction):
> ... multiple uses of the \[`QString`\] '+' operator usually means multiple memory allocations. When concatenating n substrings, where n > 2, there can be as many as n - 1 calls to the memory allocator.
With this PR
> ... the '+' will automatically be performed as the `QStringBuilder` '%' everywhere.
The change in the `src/Makefile.qt.include` file does not justify submitting this PR into the main repo, IMHO.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK a02c970eb0
Talkless:
utACK a02c970eb0, built successfully on Debian Sid with Qt 5.15.2, but did not check if any displayed strings are "wrong" after refactoring.
jarolrod:
ACK a02c970eb0
Tree-SHA512: cbb476ee96f27c3bd6e125efab74d8bf24bbdb4c30576b3feea45e203405f3bf5b497dd7d3e11361fc825fcbf4b893b152921a9efdeaf73b42d1865d85f0ae84
This commit just moves functions without making any changes. It can be
reviewed with `git log -p -n1 --color-moved=dimmed_zebra`
Motivation for this change is to make wallet.cpp/h less monolithic and
start to make wallet transaction state tracking comprehensible so bugs
in
https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/Wallet-Transaction-Conflict-Tracking
can be fixed safely without introducing new problems.
This commit moves wallet classes and methods that deal with transactions
out of wallet.cpp/.h into better organized files:
- transaction.cpp/.h - CWalletTx and CMerkleTx class definitions
- receive.cpp/.h - functions checking received transactions and computing balances
- spend.cpp/.h - functions creating transactions and finding spendable coins
After #20773, when loading is separated from syncing it will also be
possible to move more wallet.cpp/.h functions to:
- sync.cpp/.h - functions handling chain notifications and rescanning
This commit arranges receive.cpp and spend.cpp functions in dependency
order so it's possible to skim receive.cpp and get an idea of how
computing balances works, and skim spend.cpp and get an idea of how
transactions are created, without having to jump all over wallet.cpp
where functions are not in order and there is a lot of unrelated code.
Followup commit "refactor: Detach wallet transaction methods" in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21206 follows up this PR and
tweaks function names and arguments to reflect new locations. The two
commits are split into separate PRs because this commit is more work to
maintain and less work to review, while the other commit is less work to
maintain and more work to review, so hopefully this commit can be merged
earlier.
e6fe1c37d0 rpc: Improve avoidpartialspends and avoid_reuse documentation (Fabian Jahr)
8f073076b1 wallet: Increase OUTPUT_GROUP_MAX_ENTRIES to 100 (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #17824.
This increases OUTPUT_GROUP_MAX_ENTRIES to 100 which means that OutputGroups will now be up to 100 outputs large, up from previously 10. The main motivation for this change is that during the PR review club on #17824 [several participants signaled](https://bitcoincore.reviews/17824.html#l-339) that 100 might be a better value here.
I think fees should be manageable for users but more importantly, users should know what they can expect when using the wallet with this configuration, so I also tried to clarify the documentation on `-avoidpartialspends` and `avoid_reuse` a bit. If there are other additional ways how or docs where users can be made aware of the potential consequences of using these parameters, please let me know. Another small upside is that [there seem to be a high number of batching transactions with 100 and 200 inputs](https://miro.medium.com/max/3628/1*sZ5eaBSbsJsHx-J9iztq2g.png)([source](https://medium.com/@hasufly/an-analysis-of-batching-in-bitcoin-9bdf81a394e0)) giving these transactions a bit of a larger anonymity set, although that is probably a very weak argument.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK e6fe1c37d0
Xekyo:
retACK e6fe1c37d0
rajarshimaitra:
tACK `e6fe1c3`
achow101:
ACK e6fe1c37d0
glozow:
code review ACK e6fe1c37d0
Tree-SHA512: 79685c58bafa64ed8303b0ecd616fce50fc9a2b758aa79833e4ad9f15760e09ab60c007bc16ab4cbc4222e644cfd154f1fa494b0f3a5d86faede7af33a6f2826
cafef080a2 qt: Refactor to remove unnecessary block in DispatchNotifications (João Barbosa)
57785fb7f6 qt: Early subscribe core signals in transaction table model (João Barbosa)
c6cbdf1a90 qt: Refactor ShowProgress to DispatchNotifications (João Barbosa)
3bccd50ad2 qt: Set flag after inital load on transaction table model (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This fixes the case where transaction notifications arrive between `getWalletTxs` and `subscribeToCoreSignals`. Basically notifications are queued until `getWalletTxs` and wallet rescan complete.
This is also a requirement to call `getWalletTxs` in a background thread.
Motivated by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20241.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
tACK cafef080a2
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK cafef080a2. Only change since last review is splitting commits and replacing m_progress with m_loading.
meshcollider:
Code review ACK cafef080a2
Tree-SHA512: 003caab2f2ae3522619711c8d02d521d2b8f7f280a467f6c3d08abf37ca81cc66b4b9fa10acfdf34e5fe250da7b696cfeec435f72b53c1ea97ccda96d8b4be33
66545da200 Remove support for double serialization (Pieter Wuille)
fff1cae43a Convert uses of double-serialization to {En,De}codeDouble (Pieter Wuille)
afd964d70b Convert existing float encoding tests (Pieter Wuille)
bda33f98e2 Add unit tests for serfloat module (Pieter Wuille)
2be4cd94f4 Add platform-independent float encoder/decoder (Pieter Wuille)
e40224d0c7 Remove unused float serialization (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Based on #21981.
This adds a software-based platform-independent float/double encoder/decoder (platform independent in the sense that it only uses arithmetic and library calls, but never inspects the binary representation). This should strengthen our guarantee that encoded float/double values are portable across platforms. It then removes the functionality to serialize doubles from serialize.h, and replaces its only (non-test) use for fee estimation data serialization with the software encoder.
At least on x86/ARM, the only difference should be how certain NaN values are encoded/decoded (but not *whether* they are NaN or not).
It comes with tests that verify on is_iec559 platforms (which are the only ones we support, at least for now) that the serialized bytes exactly match the binary representation of floats in memory (for non-NaN).
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK 66545da200
practicalswift:
cr re-ACK 66545da200
Tree-SHA512: 62ad9adc26e28707b2eb12a919feefd4fd10cf9032652dbb1ca1cc97638ac21de89e240858e80d293d5112685c623e58affa3d316a9783ff0e6d291977a141f5
881a3e2e17 Replace size/weight estimate tuple with struct for named fields (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
For clarity of return values of size estimation functions.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 881a3e2e17
practicalswift:
cr ACK 881a3e2e17
Tree-SHA512: 9aa97e3774fcaf1e5b905259418d827051325c2ad76d6c7388ad7c687c605c024a6c5d2f7e9565f4c180ad1a9f6b179557fcb8b23371ff1a4f3b81300ac1f3d1
1be6267ce1 fuzz: don't try and use fopencookie when building for Android (fanquake)
Pull request description:
When building for Android, `_GNU_SOURCE` will be defined:
```bash
/home/ubuntu/android-sdk/ndk/22.1.7171670/toolchains/llvm/prebuilt/linux-x86_64/bin/aarch64-linux-android30-clang++ -dM -E -x c++ - < /dev/null
#define _GNU_SOURCE 1
#define _LP64 1
#define __AARCH64EL__ 1
#define __AARCH64_CMODEL_SMALL__ 1
#define __ANDROID_API__ 30
#define __ANDROID__ 1
#define __ARM_64BIT_STATE 1
.....
```
but it doesn't have the [`fopencookie()` function](https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Streams-and-Cookies.html), or define the `cookie_io_functions_t` type, which results in compile failures:
```bash
In file included from test/fuzz/addition_overflow.cpp:7:
./test/fuzz/util.h:388:15: error: unknown type name 'cookie_io_functions_t'
const cookie_io_functions_t io_hooks = {
^
15 warnings and 1 error generated.
```
Just skip trying to use it if we are building for Android. Should fix#22062.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 1be6267ce1
Tree-SHA512: d62f63d0624af04b76c7e07b0332c71eca2bf9cd9e096a60aea9e212b7bbc1548e9fa9a76d065ec719bb345fe8726619c3bd2d0631f54d877c82972b7b289321
d8f1ea7227 doc: describe in fuzzing.md how to reproduce a CI crash (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Not sure if this is 100% accurate or missing any pertinent info, but I misremembered how to do this today and it seems like useful information to provide.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK d8f1ea7227
Tree-SHA512: 1b74e4187e6ea13b04eb03b3c6e2615c4eb18cc38cce215ad1645f8b135c5c31a243748eb313ccec05f1f62187ba33d550119acf07088968d2d2c1c09bc4c653
