d2f8f1b307 use testing setup mempool in ComplexMemPool bench (glozow)
aecc332a71 create and use mempool transactions using real coins in MempoolCheck (glozow)
2118750631 [test util] to populate mempool with random transactions/packages (glozow)
5374dfc4e3 [test util] use -checkmempool for TestingSetup mempool check ratio (glozow)
d7d9c7b266 [test util] add chain name to TestChain100Setup ctor (glozow)
Pull request description:
Fixes#24634 by using the `testing_setup`'s actual mempool rather than a locally-declared mempool for running `check()`.
Also creates a test utility for populating the mempool with a bunch of random transactions. I imagine this could be useful in other places as well; it was necessary here because we needed the mempool to contain transactions *spending coins available in the current chainstate*. The existing `CreateOrderedCoins()` is insufficient because it creates coins out of thin air.
Also implements the separate suggestion to use the `TestingSetup` mempool in `ComplexMemPool` bench.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK d2f8f1b307
Tree-SHA512: 44ab5a9e55b126b5a5bc33f05fbad1380b9c43c84736c7cf487be025e0e3f5d75216ccf5a3088b0935da817e3dacfba99d2885f75bcb6e7eaa24cd20a82c24c8
a4741bd8d4 kernel: pass params to BlockManager rather than using a global (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
In a discussion today, dongcarl and I realized that is the only usage of the global `Params()` left in the kernel code.
We can use the readily available reference in `ChainstateManager` instead.
Note: There are still some uses of `BaseParams` in the kernel, so it doesn't make sense to rearrange the definitions quite yet. Once those are gone we can split the globals into new files.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK a4741bd8d4
laanwj:
Code review ACK a4741bd8d4
Tree-SHA512: bfcc0c35e6c23689e968ccc96ceda39dd5a47fe94fbe617902110fe5865c30a40ea614bcfd4b4a2c846d2e84340aa8973e70b0938786af0fecfa3e6016d7fcad
...instead of explicitly calling init::{Set,Unset}Globals.
Cool thing about this is that in both the testing and bitcoin-chainstate
codepaths, we no longer need to explicitly unset globals. The
kernel::Context goes out of scope and the globals are unset
"automatically".
Also construct kernel::Context outside of AppInitSanityChecks()
This testcase exercises rule 5 of BIP-125 (no more than 100 evictions
due to replacement) without having to test under non-default mempool
parametmers.
fa72e0ba15 Use designated initializers (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Designated initializers are supported since gcc 4.7 (Our minimum required is 8) and clang 3 (Our minimum required is 7). They work out of the box with C++17, and only msvc requires the C++20 flag to be set. I don't expect any of our msvc users will run into issues due to this. See also https://bitcoin.jonasschnelli.ch/ircmeetings/logs/bitcoin-core-dev/2022/bitcoin-core-dev.2022-03-10-19.00.log.html#l-114
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
ACK fa72e0ba15
hebasto:
ACK fa72e0ba15
Tree-SHA512: a198e9addd9af69262a7e79ae4377b55697c8dfe768b8b3d444526544b1d1f85df46f0ae81b7541bf2f73e5868fb944b159e5bf234303c7b8b9d778afb0b2840
fafaad98f7 test: Set maxfeerate=0 in MiniWallet sendrawtransaction() (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
It should be safe to set, because MiniWallet will only ever deal with test transactions, so loss-of-funds is not a reason to keep the feerate check.
It is beneficial to set, as it makes tests less verbose to write. Also, it may speed up tests, as the fee-check can be skipped: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25087#discussion_r877246529
ACKs for top commit:
michaelfolkson:
ACK fafaad98f7
theStack:
Code-review ACK fafaad98f7
Tree-SHA512: 94c5c163595207a295c7b21f0127d669a9307f6f8b1de5e043d43c52a6714076e2fdce65f2644308a2b90c679642c94f771dab1ff8bc5c0c8b1f5013324b3902
025c6ca509 Squashed 'src/univalue/' changes from 6c19d050a9..de4f73ddca (MacroFake)
9b50a309ff refactor: Replace get_int by getInt<int> alias (MacroFake)
e4e8186ab4 refactor: Explicitly convert atomic<int> to int (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This bumps the univalue subtree and changes two lines of our code. Apart from the get_int -> getInt change, this is mostly a rebase of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15975, which was closed back then.
However, given the numerous UniValue copy bugs and performance regressions in the past years, I think it makes sense to finally go through with the changes and disable potentially expensive implicit UniValue copies, which may cause OOM.
The changes here are not strictly required for that, but make future changes less verbose and easier to review.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa0cc61b7f
fanquake:
ACK fa0cc61b7f
Tree-SHA512: 9ab9e371e6a745a80c441e99fb9cd407602a8066df883135e0ea7eced7b0c6ef0e9bc88f1d99a2b4804128d636727229f44d72b5615dbf2d70da4af63fa6adec
46a890960e build: pass bdb cppflags only where needed (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Move bdb cppflags out of the catch-all `BITCOIN_INCLUDES`, and pass them
only where they are needed, which is in libbitcoin_node/wallet and the tests.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 46a890960e
Tree-SHA512: ac639bf88be1c21c5205bb14c983330c72c37f17ec4c15a746a86c54dd83853e3d75802eff48c4647484b07c1bae943ca2c3d61d2a8b0bed07d9c5b4a71dcec4
1da5e45725 test: use MiniWallet for feature_dbcrash.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR enables one more of the non-wallet functional tests (feature_dbcrash.py) to be run even with the Bitcoin Code wallet by using the MiniWallet instead, as proposed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20078.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 1da5e45725
brunoerg:
crACK 1da5e45725
Tree-SHA512: 75ee9a32fd1451254004797d695d18032bd0fcb66ebd88cf737e147e43812525f6e884ec05fcc4f76f566dc71174c8ed7347bcdce16567db6511746ae64cead0
52a797bfe5 doc: Avoid ADL for function calls (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
It happened two times recently, when [ADL](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/adl) popped up unexpectedly and brought some confusion:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24338/files#r805989994
> Any idea why this even compiles?
- https://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2022-02-18.html#l-51:
> 2022-02-18T03:24:14 \<dongcarl\> Does anyone know why this compiles? 6d3d2caa37
> 2022-02-18T03:24:14 \<dongcarl\> GetUTXOStatsWithHasher and MakeUTXOHasher are both in the `kernel::` namespace and I never added a `using` declaration on top...
> 2022-02-18T03:25:53 \<sipa\> https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/adl ?
Let's document our intention to avoid similar cases in the future.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Anyhow, ACK 52a797bfe5, there is no need to hold merge up on this, documenting it is a step forward.
Tree-SHA512: f52688b5d8f6130302185206ec6ea4731b099a75294ea2d477901a52d6d58473e3427e658aea408c140c2824c37a0399ec7376aded2a91197895ea52d51f0018
fa2d226ac9 doc: Explain squashing with merge commits (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
This avoids having to explain it in each thread
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa2d226ac9
Tree-SHA512: e1533ee7c0ab0101c78aaebed97dc889b5eb941cf4c2dfbabbb5f0ec1bb7b1313a1a2e2405235d68c761f039373cebac67ce691a72c820a9252429d50c1ac7d5
7d0f67a0d5 test: check pre-segwit peer error in `getblockfrompeer` RPC (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for the `getblockfrompeer` RPC, in the case that a block is tried to be fetched from a pre-segwit peer (i.e. a peer that doesn't signal the service bit `NODE_WITNESS`):
d4d9daff7a/src/net_processing.cpp (L1564-L1565)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 7d0f67a0d5
Tree-SHA512: bc330820686fe45577e7a53d66e2a0b339ee3ca4ef348ba3cab0a78ed891e47b3651cadf3c6c3c35d1e9a95779df010322c12d37b36700e828f6064ae35842fd
...instead of calling initialization functions directly and having to
keep around a ECCVerifyHandle member variable.
This makes the initialization codepath of our tests more closely
resemble those of AppInitMain and potentially eases the review of
subsequent commit removing init::{Set,Unset}Globals.
[META] In a future commit, we will introduce a kernel::Context which
calls init::{Set,Unset}Globals in its ctor and dtor. It will be
owned by node::NodeContext, so in the end, this patchset won't
have made the previously local ECCVerifyHandle global.
f565b2836d Fixup option name in bench message (Ben Woosley)
bf209ac7a7 doc: Fix spelling errors identified by codespell in coments (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
From the output [here](https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5275612980969472?logs=lint#L849):
```
src/qt/test/addressbooktests.cpp:185: wilcard ==> wildcard
src/qt/test/addressbooktests.cpp:191: wilcard ==> wildcard
src/test/miniscript_tests.cpp:227: nd ==> and, 2nd
src/test/versionbits_tests.cpp:260: everytime ==> every time
src/util/time.h:89: precicion ==> precision
src/util/time.h:90: precicion ==> precision
^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/spelling.ignore-words.txt
```
~~I left the 'nd' in miniscript_tests as-is, as it's valid miniscript,
and I'm wary of whitelisting it.~~
ACKs for top commit:
dunxen:
ACK f565b28
Tree-SHA512: 501a426c5f6f9761e2c8f980d5d955611428a827321888f53e0ae9526b0fecd43f9d1fa845fc70ae2489d77be6dc0b5b371dff55c5146f4b39ed874f4a1ea917
ebfc308ea4 test: add coverage for non-hex value to -minimumchainwork (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following init error:
b9ef5a10e2/src/init.cpp (L917-L919)
Passing a non-hex value to -minimumchainwork should throw an initial error.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK ebfc308ea4
kristapsk:
re-ACK ebfc308ea4
Tree-SHA512: c665903757ae3b8b2480df97bb888e60ba4387b009fcb8031041822e87a155a0e4950ebe79873c1034f0826504521d82b1fdfdb5e8378b227d14ca545b8d4e11
a35f963edf Add test for getheaders behavior (Suhas Daftuar)
ef6dbe6863 Respond to getheaders if we have sufficient chainwork (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Previously, we would check to see if we were in IBD and ignore getheaders requests accordingly. However, the IBD criteria -- an optimization mostly targeted at behavior when we have peers serving us many blocks we need to download -- is difficult to reason about in edge-case scenarios, such as if the network were to go a long time without any blocks found and nodes are getting restarted during that time.
To make things simpler to reason about, just use `nMinimumChainWork` as our anti-DoS threshold for responding to a getheaders request; as long as our chain has that much work, it should be fine to respond to a peer asking for our headers (and this should allow such a peer to request blocks from us if needed).
ACKs for top commit:
klementtan:
crACK a35f963edf
naumenkogs:
ACK a35f963edf
MarcoFalke:
review ACK a35f963edf 🗯
Tree-SHA512: 131e3872e7fe80382ea9c1ec202d6c2dc59c006355c69000aa3f4ce6bccd02a6c689c8cb8f3542b5d9bc48bfa61edcbd1a78535c0b79018971d02bed2655d284
a7973bf8f4 Revert "build: more robustly check for fcf-protection support" (fanquake)
Pull request description:
We no-longer support Clang 7 (#24164). Introduced in #20720.
This reverts commit e9189a750b.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK a7973bf8f4
Tree-SHA512: 82559637f21a97434ab29f908ebda1aada08b0786cbbf0b4d11085241942314c3f04261a624c5cd2cb3c94c99046b56626830da6b9775981ab4ba10d5979f998
151009cf76 qt, wallet, refactor: Drop unused `WalletModel::PaymentRequestExpired` (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The `PaymentRequestExpired` value in the `WalletModel::StatusCode` enumeration has been unused since bitcoin/bitcoin#17165.
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
ACK 151009cf, no usage for it.
kristapsk:
cr ACK 151009cf76, checked that `PaymentRequestExpired` is not referenced anywhere else.
Tree-SHA512: c2ea3443af5d369ca294d79559869f688aaa806b91ffe0090f3b34638a8377ec2f11d6f5c09cc2d11ab55035850237e60e992acba671097a6642c6bb9e709273
e8959000b6 test: Use MiniWallet in rpc_rawtransaction.py (Daniela Brozzoni)
e93046c10b MOVEONLY: Move signrawtransactionwithwallet test (Daniela Brozzoni)
Pull request description:
This PR allows `rpc_rawtransaction.py` to be run even without the Core wallet by using the MiniWallet instead, as proposed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20078.
This test was previously run twice, once with `--legacy-wallet` and once with
`--descriptors`. Since this would have meant running the same test twice
if the wallet wasn't compiled, now we run it just once with the legacy
wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK e8959000b6
Tree-SHA512: d1580570a54dad8e30a5df1ab7d03ecb3f824efe6843323e1f3aef63592045d823c7d54fc86321dc7c1d414854a253431a01a7baa9f30426ea9a09ef11ae3a04
de4f73ddca Merge bitcoin-core/univalue-subtree#36: Drop overloaded members
076c051488 Drop overloaded members
06265321de Merge bitcoin-core/univalue-subtree#35: Remove get_int/get_int64 in favor of getInt<>
462c503aa4 Remove get_int/get_int64 in favor of getInt<>
68c8f5532d Merge bitcoin-core/univalue#34: doc: remove TODO
297c53a5ee doc: remove TODO
git-subtree-dir: src/univalue
git-subtree-split: de4f73ddca40487179e9ed08c6f6aa745d6cbba3
This test was previously run twice, once with `--legacy-wallet` and once with
`--descriptors`.
Now we run it only with `--legacy-wallet`, as all the tests has been
ported to the MiniWallet but `raw_multisig_transaction_legacy_tests`,
which can be run only with the legacy wallet.
We also decrease the number of nodes used from 4 to 3, making the test
run slightly faster.
