a0eb4c551e Revert "Add patch to make codesign_allocate compatible with Apple's" (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This reverts #20644.
It appears that Apple has recently changed their `codesign_allocate` tool back to using 4k alignment on x86_64, at least in some cases, so this patch isn't causing our cctools-based version to be exactly compatible.
Furthermore, if codesigning were to change to use https://github.com/achow101/signapple instead, there is no need anymore to try to mimick Apple.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK a0eb4c551e
MarcoFalke:
checked-clean-revert ACK a0eb4c551e
jonasschnelli:
ACK a0eb4c551e
Tree-SHA512: 529719a76811006122406689233d1e80995107fe1ac1fc862a4ac53ca21685748ed76cac7ca648dd70f0ea43dd8dcf2e29d559beeab10e1d30dc5542ac95fd97
50a6f8f821 Add benthecarman to keys.txt (benthecarman)
Pull request description:
For https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gitian.sigs/issues/1427
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 50a6f8f821
Tree-SHA512: a667cd6bc3511feb6bfea37d9b7b9ec69dadb02f47ec6e71e478c4f2e213c5cc0b8c74beec9536d3b9aadfdc743d5fb0107bee1ce72057acf01117e0f46862c0
In 0.21, we added unbroadcast txids to mempool.dat. Commit 9c8a55d
added a try-block to prevent throwing a "failed to deserialize mempool data"
error when a user upgrades from 0.21 to 0.22. This exception handling is no
longer useful, so now we can remove it.
fa749fbea3 rpc: Replace boost::variant with std::variant for RPCArg.m_fallback (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Now that we can use std::variant from the vanilla standard library, drop the third-party boost variant dependency.
Patch is split out from #20480. A step-by-step replacement is possible because we don't have our own `Variant` wrapper and the source code specifies `boost::variant` explicitly.
I think a step-by-step replacement should be preferred, because it simplifies review.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK fa749fbea3
Sjors:
re-ACK fa749fbea3
Tree-SHA512: 5e3c12b7d535f73065b4afa8df0a488f78fb25d2234f5ecbf740e624db03a34c35fea100eb7d37e84741721310e6450b7fb4296a2207a7ed1fa24485b3650981
f3ba916e8b lint: ignore gitian keys file for spelling linter (Sebastian Falbesoner)
da289a6c4a lint: update list of spelling linter false positives (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a0022f1cfb test: bump codespell linter version to 2.0.0 (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This small patch updates the ignore list for the spelling linter script (which uses `codespell`), both removing false-positives that are not relevant anymore and adding new ones. As [suggested by jonatack](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20762#issuecomment-750889701)~~, whose last name is now also part of the list :)~~. Also changed the linter script to not check the gitian keys file, as [suggested by hebasto](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#discussion_r550763409). The codespell version used is bumped to most recent version 2.0.0, which is more aware of some terms that were previously needed in the ignorelist for v1.17.1, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#issuecomment-753428669.
Running spelling linter on master branch (repeated findings in the same file are removed to keep the output short):
```
$ ./test/lint/lint-spelling.sh
contrib/gitian-keys/keys.txt:16: Atack ==> Attack
doc/developer-notes.md:1284: inout ==> input, in out
doc/psbt.md:122: Asend ==> Ascend, as end
src/bench/verify_script.cpp:27: Keypair ==> Key pair
src/blockencodings.h:30: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user
src/compressor.h:65: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user
src/core_read.cpp:131: presense ==> presence
src/index/disktxpos.h:21: blockIn ==> blocking
src/net_processing.h:67: anounce ==> announce
src/netaddress.h:486: compatiblity ==> compatibility
src/primitives/transaction.h:35: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine
src/qt/bitcoinunits.cpp:101: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine
src/rpc/blockchain.cpp:2150: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine
src/rpc/misc.cpp:198: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine
src/script/bitcoinconsensus.cpp:81: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine
src/script/bitcoinconsensus.h:63: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine
src/script/interpreter.cpp:1279: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine
src/script/interpreter.h:222: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine
src/script/sign.cpp:17: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine
src/script/sign.h:39: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine
src/serialize.h:181: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user
src/signet.cpp:142: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine
src/test/base32_tests.cpp:17: fo ==> of, for
src/test/base64_tests.cpp:17: fo ==> of, for
src/test/script_tests.cpp:1509: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine
src/test/sighash_tests.cpp:27: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine
src/test/validation_tests.cpp:78: excercise ==> exercise
src/undo.h:36: Unser ==> Under, unset, unsure, user
src/validation.cpp:1403: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine
src/validation.h:255: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine
src/wallet/wallet.cpp:1532: nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine
src/wallet/walletdb.cpp:429: Crypted ==> Encrypted
test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py:63: unnecssary ==> unnecessary
test/functional/wallet_encryption.py:81: crypted ==> encrypted
test/functional/wallet_upgradewallet.py:36: fpr ==> for, far, fps
^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt
```
Running spelling linter on PR branch:
```
$ ./test/lint/lint-spelling.sh
src/core_read.cpp:131: presense ==> presence
src/net_processing.h:67: anounce ==> announce
src/netaddress.h:486: compatiblity ==> compatibility
src/test/validation_tests.cpp:78: excercise ==> exercise
src/wallet/walletdb.cpp:429: Crypted ==> Encrypted
test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py:63: unnecssary ==> unnecessary
test/functional/wallet_encryption.py:81: crypted ==> encrypted
^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt
```
This list of remaining findings doesn't contain false positives anymore -- the typos are fixed in PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20762.
Happy new year! 🍾
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK f3ba916e8b, only suggested changes since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20817#pullrequestreview-560632881) review.
jonatack:
ACK f3ba916e8b I don't know if there are any particular issues with bumping codespell to v2.0.0, but locally running the spelling linter and the cirrus job at https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5004066998714368 both LGTM. Thanks for also verifying and removing the unused words from the ignore list.
Tree-SHA512: e92ae6f16c01d4ff3d54f8c3a0ee95e12741f7bfe031d307a785f5cfd8a80525b16b34275f413b914c4a318f5166f9887399c21f2dad9cc7e9be41647042ef37
fad140e311 test: Set correct nValue for multi-op-return policy check (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`CTxOut::nValue` is default-initialized to `-1`. The dust-threshold for `OP_RETURN` outputs is `0`. Thus, the policy failure would be `dust` instead of `multi-op-return`. The test only passes because the dust check is currently not run.
Avoid that confusion by setting the value to `0`, to ensure the dust check passes.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK fad140e311
Tree-SHA512: f0c7a68eb2c573d6595b2b129fa8fa2a34fa35c17691f448bf1c54ccf66059c37562e7480cde7b51c4de677038d7717873da4257147a5f60acc8bbcd25fb7e3f
efaf80e9bb fuzz: check that certain script TxoutType are nonstandard (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
- Every transaction of type NONSTANDARD must not be a standard script
- The only know types of nonstandard scripts are NONSTANDARD and certain NULL_DATA and MULTISIG scripts
When reviewing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20761 I figured this is very similar and might also be good to have
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK efaf80e9bb
Tree-SHA512: 6f563ee3104ea9d2633aad95f1d003474bea759d0f22636c37aa91b5536a6ff0800c42447285ca8ed12f1b3699bf781dae1e5e0a3362da578749cd3164a06ea4
0dade9154d fuzz: remove no-longer-necessary packages from fuzzbuzz config (fanquake)
Pull request description:
I take it this is actively being used, given [comments in #20560](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20560#issuecomment-743747317); so remove old dependencies from setup.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 0dade9154d
Tree-SHA512: 781466776575e6051d0dddf4101bd057e484648f63e8e967240fefbf4b5832cacda6f6543708a0c368214a1efe0d60d371da78d7a920646cb93f1a4752aaf639
faaa4f2b6a refactor: Remove nMyStartingHeight from CNode/Connman (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
CNode and CConnman keep track of the active chain height when CNodes have been created, but apart from serializing the int once (when sending a version message), it is unused. So it can simply be removed in favor of a single int in PeerMan that can do the same.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK faaa4f2b6a
theStack:
re-ACK faaa4f2b6a⚓
Tree-SHA512: 713919e49e0f799c4a5a2e5ab07d1ca1c92d4049829680c4f436f9b3b545c548ddbee78ff80611de50cc91a116a416bcc4602e80ee64953597dc04ca15f9806d
86c495223f net: add CNode::IsInboundOnion() public getter and unit tests (Jon Atack)
6609eb8cb5 net: assert CNode::m_inbound_onion is inbound in ctor (Jon Atack)
993d1ecd19 test, fuzz: fix constructing CNode with invalid inbound_onion (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
The goal of this PR is to be able to depend on `m_inbound_onion` in AttemptToEvictConnection in #20197:
- asserts `CNode::m_inbound_onion` is inbound in the CNode ctor to have a validity check at the class boundary
- fixes a unit test and a fuzz utility that were passing invalid inbound onion values to the CNode ctor
- drops an unneeded check in `CNode::ConnectedThroughNetwork()` for its inbound status
- adds a public getter `IsInboundOnion()` that also allows unit testing it
- adds unit test coverage
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 86c495223f
LarryRuane:
ACK 86c495223f
vasild:
ACK 86c495223f
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 86c495223f🐍
Tree-SHA512: 21109105bc4e5e03076fadd489204be00eac710c9de0127708ca2d0a10a048ff81f640f589a7429967ac3eb51d35fe24bb2b12e53e7aa3efbc47aaff6396d204
ccc8d5513f doc: Update license year range to 2021 (Emil Engler)
Pull request description:
See #17801, #15061
The same procedure as every year. Happy new year to all of you :)
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 59ca9ba43d3722d5e2ada04fe6c361058a72c84b8437f6331f45e361d7ebf0f3586ccb02dc72af12b9d94f766897f0f041ce3a90efe95eeff22217f9f964ffc6
fa0074e2d8 scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Needs to be done because no one has removed the years yet
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa0074e2d8
Tree-SHA512: 210e92acd7d400b556cf8259c3ec9967797420cfd19f0c2a4fa54cb2b3d32ad9ae27e771269201e7d554c0f4cd73a8b1c1a42c9f65d8685ca4d52e5134b071a3
4ddbcd0d9a fuzz: Add coverage for CDataStream consumer (practicalswift)
546a0764f3 fuzz: Fill various small fuzzing gaps (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Fill various small fuzzing gaps.
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 4ddbcd0d9a
Tree-SHA512: d20f2cc0172f39948673846d088121782f39b4556df8b38fa14859cfa062c1519d18ee9601d4503ef1ba9613976cc5349c1fc0f0b9601a3d68127ffce1b1854e
