ff7c81f63a build: remove duplicate / unneeded libs from bench_bitcoin (fanquake)
Pull request description:
EVENT_*_LIBS are already in LDADD.
Move wallet libs into the wallet conditional, similar to zmq.
ACKs for top commit:
theuni:
ACK ff7c81f63a
Tree-SHA512: 6bd92f03478d56cd38645e38c0e6c4614cdf9c745124069d0d1d80483d76f5c656e1749061455ba04c619684513a063dda3f8f4bd09fe7b66911714d83592f25
e68d380797 rpc: remove unneeded RPCTypeCheckArgument checks (furszy)
55566630c6 rpc: treat univalue type check error as RPC_TYPE_ERROR, not RPC_MISC_ERROR (furszy)
Pull request description:
Same rationale as #26039, tackling another angle of the problem.
#### Context
We have the same univalue type error checking code spread/duplicated few times:
`RPCTypeCheckObj`, `RPCTypeCheckArgument`, `UniValue::checkType`.
In the first two functions, we are properly returning an `RPC_TYPE_ERROR` while in `UniValue::checkType`
we are throwing an `std::runtime_error` which is caught by the RPC server request handler, who invalidly
treats it as `RPC_MISC_ERROR` (which is a generic error return code that provides no information to the user).
#### Proposed Changes
Throw a custom exception from `Univalue::checkType` (instead of a plain
`std::runtime_error`) and catch it on the RPC server request handler.
So we properly return `RPC_TYPE_ERROR` (-3) on every arg type error and
not the general `RPC_MISC_ERROR` (-1).
This will allow us to remove all the `RPCTypeCheckArgument` calls. As them are redundant since #25629.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 4e4c41851fd4e2b01a2d8b94e71513f9831f810768ebd89684caca4901e87d3677980003949bcce441f9ca607a1b38a5894839b6c492f5947b8bab8cd9423ba6
68209a7b5c rpc: make addpeeraddress work with cjdns addresses (Martin Zumsande)
a8a9ed67cc init: Abort if i2p/cjdns are chosen via -onlynet but unreachable (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
If the networks i2p / cjdns are chosen via `-onlynet` but the user forgot to provide `-i2psam` / `-cjdnsreachable`, no outbound connections will be made - it would be nice to inform the user about that.
The solution proposed here mimics existing behavior for `-onlynet=onion` and non-specified `-onion`/`-proxy` where we already abort with an InitError - if reviewers would prefer to just print a warning, please say so.
The second commit adds CJDNS support to the debug-only `addpeeraddress` RPC allowing to add CJDNS addresses to addrman for testing and debug purposes. (if `-cjdnsreachable=1`)
This is the result of an [IRC discussion](https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2022-09-01#848066;) with vasild.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK 68209a7b5c
dergoegge:
ACK 68209a7b5c
Tree-SHA512: 6db9787f01820190f14f90a0b39e4206603421eb7521f792879094d8bbf4d4d0bfd70665eadcc40994ac7941a15ab5a8d65c4779fba5634c0e6fa66eb0972b8d
fad61573ed Fix nNextResend data race in ResubmitWalletTransactions (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Now that `ResubmitWalletTransactions` is called from more than one thread, it is no longer thread-safe.
Introduced in 5291933fed.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fad61573ed
jonatack:
ACK fad61573ed
stickies-v:
However, I think the current data race UB fix in fad61573e is the most critical to get into v24, so: ACK fad61573e - but open to further improvements.
Tree-SHA512: 54da2ed1c5f44e33588ac1d21ce26908fcf0bfe785c28ba8f6a479389b5ab7a0b32b016d4c482a2ccb405e0686efb61ffe23e427f5e589dc7d2b3c7469978977
d575a675cc net_processing: add thread safety annotation for m_highest_fast_announce (Anthony Towns)
0ae7987f68 net_processing: add thread safety annotations for PeerManagerImpl members accessed only via the msgproc thread (Anthony Towns)
a66a7ccb82 net_processing: add thread safety annotations for Peer members accessed only via the msgproc thread (Anthony Towns)
bf12abe454 net: drop cs_sendProcessing (Anthony Towns)
1e78f566d5 net: add NetEventsInterface::g_msgproc_mutex (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
There are many cases where we assume message processing is single-threaded in order for how we access node-related memory to be safe. Add an explicit mutex that we can use to document this, which allows the compiler to catch any cases where we try to access that memory from other threads and break that assumption.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK d575a675cc 📽
dergoegge:
Code review ACK d575a675cc
w0xlt:
ACK d575a675cc
vasild:
ACK d575a675cc modulo the missing runtime checks
Tree-SHA512: b886d1aa4adf318ae64e32ccaf3d508dbb79d6eed3f1fa9d8b2ed96f3c72a3d38cd0f12e05826c9832a2a1302988adfd2b43ea9691aa844f37d8f5c37ff20e05
b6a65568df Fix issues identified by codespell 2.2.1 and update ignored words (Jon Atack)
8f2010de6e Bump codespell version to 2.2.1 (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
as well as one in `test/lint/lint-locale-dependence.py` not seen by the spelling linter.
Can be tested locally by running `test/lint/lint-spelling.py` on this branch versus on master and by checking the CI linter result.
ACKs for top commit:
satsie:
ACK b6a65568df
Tree-SHA512: ab4ba029a9a5de5926fa5d336bd3b21245acf0649c6aa69a48c223bd22327e13beb32e970f66f54db58cd318731b643e1c7ace9a89776ed2a069cddc02363b71
fa2b8ae0a2 util: improve bitcoin-wallet exit codes (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Refactors `bitcoin-wallet` so that it doesn't return a non-zero exit code by default, and makes the option handling more inline with the other binaries. i.e outputting `Error: too few parameters` if you don't pass any options.
Fixing this means we can check the process output in `gen-manpages.py`; which addresses the remaining [review comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24263#discussion_r806126705) from #24263.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 80bd8098faefb4401ca1e4d49937ef6c960cf60ce0e7fb9dc38904fbc2fd92e319ec04570381da84943b7477845bf6be00e977f4c0451b247a6698662ce8f1bf
I just spent a few hours trying to figure out why "18444" wasn't getting
me to regtest's RPC server. I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed, but I
was maybe understandably confused because "Bound to
127.0.0.1:18445" appears in the logs, which I assumed was the P2P port.
This change logs the RPC listening address, which seems like a basic
piece of information that shouldn't be buried in debug logs.
cs_desc_main is typically locked within scope of a cs_wallet lock, but:
CWallet::IsLocked locks cs_wallet
...called from DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan::GetKeys
...called from DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan::GetSigningProvider which locks cs_desc_main first, but has no access to cs_wallet
...called from DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan::SignMessage
...called from CWallet::SignMessage which can access and lock cs_wallet
Resolve the out of order locks by grabbing cs_wallet in CWallet::SignMessage first
faf5bb87da doc: Move -permitbaremultisig to the relay help category (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
This transaction relay setting doesn't have anything to do with establishing p2p connections.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
concept ACK faf5bb87da
luke-jr:
utACK faf5bb87da, but (nit) prefer to keep it on a single line
Tree-SHA512: 436fcff5191c346fe16b3208411886e3239fb5819322673a45cf0c0f9a3070563d312da8bb5d5f6060b36d305e59e5b58928526d5042cb3dac29ce7740d17c1c
c3e536555a Bugfix: Wallet: Return util::Error rather than non-error nullptr when CreateWallet/LoadWallet/RestoreWallet fail (Luke Dashjr)
335ff98c8a Bugfix: Wallet: Wrap RestoreWallet content in a try block to ensure exceptions become returned errors and incomplete wallet directory is removed (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Bug 1: `copy_file` can throw exceptions, but `RestoreWallet` is expected to return a nullptr with a populated `errors` parameter. This is fixed by wrapping `copy_file` and `LoadWallet` (for good measure) in a `try` block, and converting any exceptions to the intended return style.
Bug 2: `util::Result` turns what would have been a `false` unique_ptr into a `true` nullptr result, which leads to nullptr dereferences in at least the 3 cases of wallet creation/loading/restoring. This is fixed by keeping the pointer as a plain `std::unique_ptr` until actually returning it (ie, after the nullptr check).
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/661
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK c3e536555a
Tree-SHA512: 4291b3dbbb147acea2e63a704324c9371bc16ecb4237f8753729b0b0a6e55c9758ad61bfe8bd432fd7b0bae95d8b63a9831e61ac8b8d5c0197b550a2e0f4a105
a10df7cf35 build: prune BOOST_CPPFLAGS from libbitcoin_zmq (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Rather than including `validation.h`, which ultimately means needing boost via `txmempool.h`, include `primitives/block.h` for `CBlock`, and remove `validation.h`, as we can get `cs_main` from `node/blockstorage.h`.
ACKs for top commit:
theuni:
Nice. ACK a10df7cf35.
hebasto:
ACK a10df7cf35, tested on Linux x86_64 using theuni's [patch](e131d8f1e3) with depends.
Tree-SHA512: 792b6f9e7e7788d10333b4943609efbc798f3b187c324a0f2d5acbb2d44e3c67705dc54d698eb04c23e5af7b8b73a47f8e7974e819eac12f12ae62f28c807476
f839697d9b build: remove BOOST_CPPFLAGS usage from bitcoin-tx (fanquake)
Pull request description:
The only reason `BOOST_CPPFLAGS` was needed here, is because of the `policy/rbf.h` include, which ultimately includes boost multi_index via `txmempool.h`. However this include is unused.
ACKs for top commit:
theuni:
Nice. ACK f839697d9b.
hebasto:
ACK f839697d9b, tested on Linux x86_64 using theuni's [patch](e131d8f1e3) with depends.
Tree-SHA512: ec93f4045d927789d70e2a96a6869c0df63891483bb61361327bfefafaabc2925f63382aa3d9302963df2306bc035edad4cabd5eeb315db6603266e677be7cd3
26cf9ea8e4 scripted-diff: rename pszThread to thread_name (stickies-v)
200d84d568 refactor: use std::string for index names (stickies-v)
97f5b20c12 refactor: use std::string for thread names (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
As a follow-up to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25967#discussion_r959637189, this PR changes the return type of [`BaseIndex::GetName()`](fa5c224d44/src/index/base.h (L120)) to `const std::string&` instead of `const char*`. The first commit is not essential for this change, but since the code is touched and index names are commonly used to specify thread names, I've made the same update there.
No behaviour change, just refactoring to further phase out C-style strings.
Note: `util::ThreadRename()` used to take an rvalue ref, but since it then passes this to `SetInternalName()` by value, I don't think there's any benefit to having both an rvalue and lvalue ref function so I just changed it into lvalue ref. Not 100% sure I'm missing something?
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 26cf9ea8e4 only change is new scripted-diff 😀
hebasto:
ACK 26cf9ea8e4, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
w0xlt:
reACK 26cf9ea8e4
Tree-SHA512: 44a03ebf2bb86ca1411a36222a575217cdba8ee3a3c985e74d74c934516f002b27336147fa22f59eda7dac21204a93951563317005d475da95b23c427014d77b
fa521c9603 Use steady clock for all millis bench logging (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Currently `GetTimeMillis` is used for bench logging in milliseconds integral precision. Replace it to use a steady clock that is type-safe and steady.
Microsecond or float precision can be done in a follow-up.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa521c9603 - started making the same change.
Tree-SHA512: 86a810e496fc663f815acb8771a6c770331593715cde85370226685bc50c13e8e987e3c5efd0b4e48b36ebd2372255357b709204bac750d41e94a9f7d9897fa6
04fee75bac Use ReadLE64 in uint256::GetUint64() instead of duplicating logic (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
No need to have a (naive) copy of the `ReadLE64` logic inside `uint256::GetUint64`, when we have an optimized function for exactly that.
ACKs for top commit:
davidgumberg:
ACK 04fee75bac
jonatack:
ACK 04fee75bac review, this use of ReadLE64() is similar to the existing invocation by Num3072::Num3072(), sanity checked that before and after this change GetUint64() returns the same result (debug build, clang 13)
Tree-SHA512: 0fc2681536a18d82408411bcc6d5c6445fb96793fa43ff4021cd2933d46514c725318da35884f428d1799023921f33f8af091ef428ceb96a50866ac53a345356
8b2891a6d1 i2p: use the same destination type for transient and persistent addresses (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
We generate our persistent I2P address with type `EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519` (`DEST GENERATE SIGNATURE_TYPE=7`).
Use the same type for our transient addresses which are created by the `SESSION CREATE ...` command. If not specified, then the default one is `DSA_SHA1` according to https://geti2p.net/en/docs/api/samv3.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26062
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
ACK 8b2891a6d1
sipa:
utACK 8b2891a6d10f4a3875010d2e8eafd78bcf378952; didn't test but verified this matches the documentation
Tree-SHA512: 1b10e7e1e274b77609d08ee9cf9d73fef8c975c51aec452ce23e15fcf41709398c697087bfdece121b1fd26bc0501fc45857a91aaab679cadd0cbb37dd94c3a7
02c9e56468 fs: fully initialize _OVERLAPPED for win32 (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
```bash
fs.cpp: In member function ‘bool fsbridge::FileLock::TryLock()’:
fs.cpp:129:32: error: missing initializer for member ‘_OVERLAPPED::InternalHigh’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
129 | _OVERLAPPED overlapped = {0};
| ^
fs.cpp:129:32: error: missing initializer for member ‘_OVERLAPPED::<anonymous>’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
fs.cpp:129:32: error: missing initializer for member ‘_OVERLAPPED::hEvent’ [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
```
Came up in #25972. That PR is now rebased on this change.
Closes: #26006
ACKs for top commit:
sipsorcery:
tACK 02c9e56468.
hebasto:
ACK 02c9e56468, tested on Linux x86_64:
Tree-SHA512: 6a0495c34bd952b2bb8c994a1450da7d3eee61225bb4ff0ce009c013f5e29dba94bb1c3ecef9989dc18c939909fdc8eba690a38f96da431ae9d64c23656de7d0
By throwing a custom exception from `Univalue::checkType` (instead of a plain
std::runtime_error) and catching it on the RPC server request handler.
So we properly return RPC_TYPE_ERROR (-3) on arg type errors and
not the general RPC_MISC_ERROR (-1).
and also fix spelling in test/lint/lint-locale-dependence.py not caught by the
spelling linter and fix up a paragraph we are touching here in test/README.md.
The `sendall` RPC doesn't use `CreateTransactionInternal`as the rest of
the wallet RPCs and it never checks against the tx-size mempool limit.
Add a check for tx-size as well as test coverage for that case.
6f8e3818af sendall: check if the maxtxfee has been exceeded (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
Previously the `sendall` RPC didn't check whether the fees of the transaction it creates exceed the set `maxtxfee`. This PR adds this check to `sendall` and a test case for it.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 6f8e3818af
Xekyo:
ACK 6f8e3818af
glozow:
Concept ACK 6f8e3818af. The high feerate is unlikely but sendall should respect the existing wallet options.
Tree-SHA512: 6ef0961937091293d49be16f17e4451cff3159d901c0c7c6e508883999dfe0c20ed4d7126bf74bfea8150d4c1eef961a45f0c28ef64562e6cb817fede2319f1a
There are many cases where we assume message processing is
single-threaded in order for how we access node-related memory to be
safe. Add an explicit mutex that we can use to document this, which allows
the compiler to catch any cases where we try to access that memory from
other threads and break that assumption.
b00fc44ca5 test: add coverage for 'add_inputs' dynamic default value (furszy)
ddbcfdf3d0 RPC: bugfix, 'add_inputs' default value is true unless 'inputs' are provided (furszy)
Pull request description:
This bugfix was meant to be in #25685, but decoupled it to try to make it part of 24.0 release.
It's a truly misleading functionality.
This PR doesn't change behavior in any way. Just fixes two invalid RPC help messages and adds test
coverage for the current behavior.
#### Description
In both RPC commands `send()` and `walletcreatefundedpsbt` the help message says
that `add_inputs` default value is false when it's actually dynamically set by the following statement:
```c++
coin_control.m_allow_other_inputs = rawTx.vin.size() == 0;
```
Which means that, by default, `add_inputs` is true unless there is any pre-set input, in which
case, the default is false.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK b00fc44ca5
S3RK:
ACK b00fc44ca5
Tree-SHA512: 5c68a40d81c994e0ab6de0817db69c4d3dea3a9a64a60362531bf583b7a4c37d524b740905a3f3a89cdbf221913ff5b504746625adb8622788aea93a35bbcd40
8ed2b72767 qt: Prevent wrong handling of `%2` token by Transifex (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On master (124e75a41e), Transifex translation check fails for 124e75a41e/src/qt/forms/intro.ui (L206) with a message:
> The expression '%2G' is not present in the translation.
In "Organization Settings" --> ["Translation checks"](https://www.transifex.com/bitcoin/settings/validations/) I have changed the status of the "**Variable substitution specifiers (like "%s") are preserved in the translations.**" check from "error" to "warning" temporarily. This setting should be reverted after applying this PR change.
[Noted](https://www.transifex.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/translate/#ru/qt-translation-024x/436102928/) by Transifex user [AHOHNMYC](https://www.transifex.com/user/profile/AHOHNMYC/).
I faced the same issue while working on Ukrainian translation.
ACKs for top commit:
katesalazar:
ACK 8ed2b72767
jarolrod:
ACK 8ed2b72767
Tree-SHA512: 304f795ac9241ac8453c614ed18d967226d9d515f9ea079b51af5bcbe2f0760ca7dcaea5efb38207720cb7a18159c2bcd337b961bc522a128715c70e0db81061
