e80259f197 Additionally treat Tx.nVersion as unsigned in joinpsbts (Matt Corallo)
970de70bdd Dump transaction version as an unsigned integer in RPC/TxToUniv (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
Consensus-wise we already treat it as an unsigned integer (the
only rules around it are in CSV/locktime handling), but changing
the underlying data type means touching consensus code for a
simple cleanup change, which isn't really worth it.
See-also, https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/299
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK e80259f197
practicalswift:
ACK e80259f197
ajtowns:
ACK e80259f197 code review -- checked all other uses of tx.nVersion treat it as unsigned (except for policy.cpp:IsStandard anyway), so looks good.
naumenkogs:
ACK e80259f
Tree-SHA512: 6760a2c77e24e9e1f79a336ca925f9bbca3a827ce02003c71d7f214b82ed3dea13fa7d9f87df9b9445cd58dff8b44a15571d821c876f22f8e5a372a014c9976b
84d295e513 tests: Check that segwit inputs in psbt have both UTXO types (Andrew Chow)
4600479058 psbt: always put a non_witness_utxo and don't remove it (Andrew Chow)
5279d8bc07 psbt: Allow both non_witness_utxo and witness_utxo (Andrew Chow)
72f6bec1da rpc: show both UTXOs in decodepsbt (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Due to recent changes to hardware wallets, the full previous transaction will need to be provided for segwit inputs. Since some software may be checking for the existence of a `witness_utxo` to determine whether to produce a segwit signature, we keep that field to ease the transition.
Because all of the sanity checks implemented by the `IsSane` functions were related to having mixed segwit and non-segwit data in a PSBT, those functions are removed as those checks are no longer proper.
Some tests are updated/removed to accommodate this and a simple test added to check that both UTXOs are being added to segwit inputs.
As discussed in the wallet IRC meeting, our own signer will not require `non_witness_utxo` for segwit inputs.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK 84d295e513 (didn't retest compared to 836d6fc, but fortunately HWI's CI tracks our master branch, with a bunch of hardware wallet simulators)
ryanofsky:
Code review re-ACK 84d295e513. No changes since last review, but now I understand the context better. I think it would good to improve the comments as suggested https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19215#discussion_r447889473 and maybe refer to
meshcollider:
utACK 84d295e513
Tree-SHA512: ccc1fd3c16ac3859f5aca4fa489bd40f68be0b81bbdc4dd51188bbf28827a8642dc8b605a37318e5f16cf40f1c4910052dace2f27eca21bb58435f02a443e940
fa32adf9dc scripted-diff: TxoutType C++11 scoped enum class (MarcoFalke)
fa95a694c4 doc: Update outdated txnouttype documentation (MarcoFalke)
fa58469c77 rpc: Properly use underlying type in GetAllOutputTypes (MarcoFalke)
fa41c65702 rpc: Simplify GetAllOutputTypes with the Join helper (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Non-scoped enums can accidentally and silently decay into an integral type. Also, the symbol names of the keys are exported to the surrounding (usually global) namespace.
Fix both issues by switching to an `enum class TxoutType` in a (mostly) scripted-diff.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa32adf9dc -- patch looks correct
hebasto:
re-ACK fa32adf9dc, since fa5997bd6fc82e16b597ea96e3c5c665f1f174ab (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19114#pullrequestreview-421425198) rebased only (verified with `git range-diff`).
Tree-SHA512: f42a9db47f9be89fa4bdd8d2fb05a16726286d8b12e3d87327b67d723f91c7d5a57deb4b2ddae9e1d16fee7a5f8c00828b6dc8909c5db680fc5e0a3cf07cd465
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
# General rename helper: $1 -> $2
rename_global() { sed -i "s/\<$1\>/$2/g" $(git grep -l "$1"); }
# Helper to rename TxoutType $1
rename_value() {
sed -i "s/ TX_$1,/ $1,/g" src/script/standard.h; # First strip the prefix in the definition (header)
rename_global TX_$1 "TxoutType::$1"; # Then replace globally
}
# Change the type globally to bring it in line with the style-guide
# (clsses are UpperCamelCase)
rename_global 'enum txnouttype' 'enum class TxoutType'
rename_global 'txnouttype' 'TxoutType'
# Now rename each enum value
rename_value 'NONSTANDARD'
rename_value 'PUBKEY'
rename_value 'PUBKEYHASH'
rename_value 'SCRIPTHASH'
rename_value 'MULTISIG'
rename_value 'NULL_DATA'
rename_value 'WITNESS_V0_KEYHASH'
rename_value 'WITNESS_V0_SCRIPTHASH'
rename_value 'WITNESS_UNKNOWN'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2599d13c94 rpc: Remove deprecated migration code (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Don't accept a second argument to `sendrawtransaction` and
`testmempoolaccept` of type `bool`. Actually even the code before this
change would not accept `bool`, but it would print a long explanatory
message when rejecting it: "Second argument must be numeric (maxfeerate)
and no longer supports a boolean. To allow a transaction with high fees,
set maxfeerate to 0."
This was scheduled for removal in 6c0a6f73e.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 2599d13c94📅
Tree-SHA512: e2c74c0bde88e20149d0deab0845851bb3979143530a6bae4f46769d61b607ad2e2347f8969093c2461a80c47661732dc0b3def140f8ce84081719adda3b3811
Don't accept a second argument to `sendrawtransaction` and
`testmempoolaccept` of type `bool`. Actually even the code before this
change would not accept `bool`, but it would print a long explanatory
message when rejecting it: "Second argument must be numeric (maxfeerate)
and no longer supports a boolean. To allow a transaction with high fees,
set maxfeerate to 0."
This was scheduled for removal in 6c0a6f73e.
8a2a652e6f Remove redundant type information from rpc docs (David O'Callaghan)
Pull request description:
Simple edit of the RPC calls to remove redundant text ("A json object/array ...") from the beginning of help.
Fixes: #18258
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: cbbf760e0b7b4eda61c40b420ed77f5d878318e37b0eb13e63567212240b2c4ecc15d84030e98075e21c9ae9016539adfd201e5661ea824166a76d335180c32f
deaa6dd144 psbt: check output index is within bounds before accessing (Andrew Chow)
f1ef7f0aa4 Don't calculate tx fees for PSBTs with invalid money values (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Fixes#17149
Two classes of issues were found by the psbt fuzzer: values out of range and causing overflows, and prevout indexes being out of range. This PR fixes both.
When accessing a specific output using the index given in the tx, check that it is actually a possible output before trying to access the output.
When summing and checking amounts for `decodepsbt` and `analyzepsbt`, make sure that the values are actually valid money values.. Otherwise, stop summing and don't show the fee. For `analyzepsbt`, return that the next role is the Creator since the Creator needs to remake the transaction to be valid.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK deaa6dd144 -- only change since last ACK was the addition of tests
gwillen:
tested ACK deaa6dd, would also like to see this merged!
Tree-SHA512: 06c36720bbb5a7ab1c29f7d15878bf9f0d3e5760c06bff479d412e1bf07bb3e0e9ab6cca820a4bfedaab71bfd7af813807e87cbcdf0af25cc3f66a53a06dbcfd
fa8e650b52 rest: Use mempool from node context instead of global (MarcoFalke)
fa660d65d7 node: Use mempool from node context instead of global (MarcoFalke)
facbaf092f rpc: Use mempool from node context instead of global (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently they are identical, but in the future we might want to turn
the mempool into a unique_ptr. Replacing the global with the mempool
pointer from the node context simplifies this step.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK fa8e650b5
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa8e650b52, Only the discussed REST server changes since the last review.
Tree-SHA512: 0836f3f39cf90306455962918446e5f8612e88c32072b92afc30929aea1f17430bbda0e2b3668d36c9d6b97d63a93cf4903185194571108642b7bf5a39b89125
In decodepsbt if an invalid amount is seen, don't calculate the fee
but still show the invalid value in the decode.
In analyze psbt, if an invalid amount is seen, set the next step to
be the creator as the creator needs to remake the transaction so that
it is valid.
773d4572a4 Mark PSBTs spending unspendable outputs as invalid in analysis (Andrew Chow)
638e40cb60 Have a PSBTAnalysis state that indicates invalid PSBT (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When analyzing an unspendable PSBT, report that it is unspendable and exit analysis early.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 773d457
instagibbs:
After some thought ACK 773d4572a4
Tree-SHA512: 99b0cb2fa1ea37593fc65a20effe881639d69ddeeecf5197bc87bc7f2220cbeb40f1d429d517e4d27f2e9fb563a00cd845d2b4b1ce05246a75a6cb56fb9b0ba5
Currently they are identical, but in the future we might want to turn
the mempool into a unique_ptr. Replacing the global with the mempool
pointer from the node context simplifies this step.
Invalid PSBTs need to be re-created, so the next role is the
Creator (new PSBTRole). Additionally, we need to know what went
wrong so an error field was added to PSBTAnalysis.
A PSBTAnalysis indicating invalid will have empty everything,
next will be set to PSBTRole::CREATOR, and an error message.
SignTransaction will be called multiple times in the future. Pass
it a result UniValue so that it can accumulate the results of multiple
SignTransaction passes.
3004d5a12d [validation] Remove fMissingInputs from AcceptToMemoryPool() (John Newbery)
c428622a5b [validation] Remove unused first_invalid parameter from ProcessNewBlockHeaders() (John Newbery)
7204c6434b [validation] Remove useless ret parameter from Invalid() (John Newbery)
1a37de4b31 [validation] Remove error() calls from Invalid() calls (John Newbery)
067981e492 [validation] Tidy Up ValidationResult class (John Newbery)
a27a2957ed [validation] Add CValidationState subclasses (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Carries out some remaining tidy-ups remaining after PR 15141:
- split ValidationState into TxValidationState and BlockValidationState (commit from ajtowns)
- various minor code style tidy-ups to the ValidationState class
- remove the useless `ret` parameter from `ValidationState::Invalid()`
- remove the now unused `first_invalid` parameter from `ProcessNewBlockHeaders()`
- remove the `fMissingInputs` parameter from `AcceptToMemoryPool()`, and deal with missing inputs the same way as other errors by using the `TxValidationState` object.
Tip for reviewers (thanks ryanofsky!): The first commit ("[validation] Add CValidationState subclasses" ) is huge and can be easier to start reviewing if you revert the rote, mechanical changes:
Substitute the commit hash of commit "[validation] Add CValidationState subclasses" for <CommitHash> in the commands below.
```sh
git checkout <CommitHash>
git grep -l ValidationState | xargs sed -i 's/BlockValidationState\|TxValidationState/CValidationState/g'
git grep -l ValidationResult | xargs sed -i 's/BlockValidationResult\|TxValidationResult/ValidationInvalidReason/g'
git grep -l MaybePunish | xargs sed -i 's/MaybePunishNode\(ForBlock\|ForTx\)/MaybePunishNode/g'
git diff HEAD^
```
After that it's possible to easily see the mechanical changes with:
```sh
git log -p -n1 -U0 --word-diff-regex=. <CommitHash>
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 3004d5a12d
amitiuttarwar:
code review ACK 3004d5a12d. Also built & ran tests locally.
fjahr:
Code review ACK 3004d5a12d . Only nit style change and pure virtual destructor added since my last review.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 3004d5a12d. Just whitespace change and pure virtual destructor added since last review.
Tree-SHA512: 511de1fb380a18bec1944ea82b513b6192df632ee08bb16344a2df3c40811a88f3872f04df24bc93a41643c96c48f376a04551840fd804a961490d6c702c3d36
362ded410b Avoid using g_rpc_node global in wallet code (Russell Yanofsky)
8922d7f6b7 scripted-diff: Remove g_connman, g_banman globals (Russell Yanofsky)
e6f4f895d5 Pass NodeContext, ConnMan, BanMan references more places (Russell Yanofsky)
4d5448c76b MOVEONLY: Move NodeContext struct to node/context.h (Russell Yanofsky)
301bd41a2e scripted-diff: Rename InitInterfaces to NodeContext (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This change is mainly a naming / organization change intended to simplify #10102. It:
- Renames struct InitInterfaces to struct NodeContext and moves it from
src/init.h to src/node/context.h. This is a cosmetic change intended to make
the point of the struct more obvious.
- Gets rid of BanMan and ConnMan globals making them NodeContext members
instead. Getting rid of these globals has been talked about in past as a way
to implement testing and simulations. Making them NodeContext members is a
way of keeping them accessible without the globals.
- Splits g_rpc_interfaces global into g_rpc_node and g_rpc_chain globals. This
better separates node and wallet rpc methods. Node RPC methods should have
access NodeContext, while wallet RPC methods should only have indirect access
to node functionality via interfaces::Chain.
- Adds NodeContext& references to interfaces::Chain class and the
interfaces::MakeChain() function. This is needed to access ConnMan and BanMan
instances without the globals.
- Gets rid of redundant Node and Chain instances in Qt tests. This is
needed due to the previous MakeChain change, and also makes test setup a
little more straightforward. More cleanup could be done in the future, but it
will require deduplication of bitcoind, bitcoin-qt, and TestingSetup init
code.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 362ded410b
Tree-SHA512: 9ae6ff1e33423291d1e52056bac95e0874538390892a6e83c4c115b3c73155a8827c0191b46eb3d14e3b3f6c23ccb08095490880fbc3188026319c71739f7db2
Wallet code should use interfaces::Chain and not directly access to node state.
Add a g_rpc_chain replacement global for wallet code to use, and move
g_rpc_node definition to a libbitcoin_server source file so there are link
errors if wallet code tries to access it.
9075d13153 [docs] Add release notes for removal of REJECT reasons (John Newbery)
04a2f326ec [validation] Fix REJECT message comments (John Newbery)
e9d5a59e34 [validation] Remove REJECT code from CValidationState (John Newbery)
0053e16714 [logging] Don't log REJECT code when transaction is rejected (John Newbery)
a1a07cfe99 [validation] Fix peer punishment for bad blocks (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
We no longer send BIP 61 REJECT messages, so there's no need to set
a REJECT code in the CValidationState object.
Note that there is a minor bug fix in p2p behaviour here. Because the
call to `MaybePunishNode()` in `PeerLogicValidation::BlockChecked()` only
previously happened if the REJECT code was > 0 and < `REJECT_INTERNAL`,
then there are cases were `MaybePunishNode()` can get called where it
wasn't previously:
- when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `CACHED_INVALID`.
- when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `BLOCK_MISSING_PREV`.
Note that `BlockChecked()` cannot fail with an 'internal' reject code. The
only internal reject code was `REJECT_HIGHFEE`, which was only set in
ATMP.
This reverts a minor bug introduced in 5d08c9c579.
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
ACK 9075d13, changes since last reviewed are splitting them in separate commits to ease understanding and fix nits
fjahr:
ACK 9075d13153, confirmed diff to last review was fixing nits in docs/comments.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9075d13153. Only changes since last review are splitting the main commit and updating comments
Tree-SHA512: 58e8a1a4d4e6f156da5d29fb6ad6a62fc9c594bbfc6432b3252e962d0e9e10149bf3035185dc5320c46c09f3e49662bc2973ec759679c0f3412232087cb8a3a7
85016e52f6 [rpc] Fix broken bitcoin-cli examples (Andrew Toth)
Pull request description:
This fixes the `bitcoin-cli` examples for `combinerawtransaction`, `combinepsbt` and `testmempoolaccept`. They currently return `Error parsing JSON`.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 85016e52f6
Tree-SHA512: b561f68f7a188dc91dab1ceb98da3ac3e232143ab2b906c90f95c6b74b584599d0f3b51f067cdd3b1153931f95b3dc385e453b1a0dde86f9cb549b94560f219d
