90be29c5b5 wallet: enable SQLite extended result codes (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
With this change, we get more fine-grained error messages if something goes wrong in the course of communicating with the SQLite database. To pick some random examples, the error codes SQLITE_IOERR_NOMEM, SQLITE_IOERR_CORRUPTFS or SQLITE_IOERR_FSYNC are way more specific than just a plain SQLITE_IOERR, and the corresponding error messages generated by sqlite3_errstr() will hence give a better hint to the user (or also to the developers, if an error report is sent) what the cause for a failure is.
See the SQLite documentation
https://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/extended_result_codes.htmlhttps://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/c_abort_rollback.html
> In its default configuration, SQLite API routines return one of 30 integer result codes. However, experience has shown that many of these result codes are too coarse-grained. They do not provide as much information about problems as programmers might like. In an effort to address this, newer versions of SQLite (version 3.3.8 2006-10-09 and later) include support for additional result codes that provide more detailed information about errors.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK 90be29c
achow101:
ACK 90be29c5b5
laanwj:
Code review ACK 90be29c5b5
Tree-SHA512: 2b7a60860c206f2b5f8ff9d4a7698efdee897c9ad024621b8fd165b841c20746d9780da3cf46aaf448a777e229a5b3cdf3a4792e8ef82cda9c5d46e354a9a598
The helps for RPCs gettransaction, listtransactions, and
listsinceblock returned by TransactionDescriptionString()
state that the "trusted" boolean field is only present if the
transaction is trusted and safe to spend from.
The "trusted" boolean field is in fact returned by
WalletTxToJSON() when the transaction has 0 confirmations,
or negative confirmations, if conflicted, and it can be
true or false.
This commit updates TransactionDescriptionString() to a
more accurate description for "trusted" and updates the
existing line of test coverage to fail more helpfully.
240ea294d5 doc: update doxygen documention of ComputeTimeSmart() and AddToWalletIfInvolvingMe() regarding rescanning_old_block parameter (BitcoinTsunami)
d6eb39af21 test: add functional test to check transaction time determination during block rescanning (BitcoinTsunami)
07b44f16e7 wallet: fix ComputeTimeSmart algorithm to use blocktime during old block rescanning (BitcoinTsunami)
Pull request description:
The function ComputeTimeSmart in wallet.cpp assume that transaction are discovered in the right order.
Moreover the 'smarttime' determination algorithm is coded with realtime scenario in mind and not rescanning of old block.
The functional test demonstrate that if the user import a wallet, then rescan only recent history, and then rescan the entire history, the older transaction discovered would have an incorrect time determination.
In the context of rescanning old block, the only time value that as a meaning is the blocktime.
That's why I've fixed the problem with a simple separation between rescanning of old block and realtime time determination. The fix is written to have no impact on every realtime scenario and only impact the behaviour during a rescanning process.
This PR Fixes#20181.
To be fair, I don't think that this bug could be triggered with the wallet GUI, because it always proceed with a proper rescan.
But RPC API provide the possibility to trigger it. I've discovered it, because Specter desktop v0.10.0 was impacted. (https://github.com/cryptoadvance/specter-desktop/issues/680).
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 240ea294d5 per `git diff b92d552 240ea29`, re-verified rebase to latest master + debug build clean + new test passes on the branch and fails on master, only change since my review a few hours ago is incorporation of latest review suggestions
meshcollider:
re-utACK 240ea294d5
Tree-SHA512: 514b02e41d011ddfa325f5e8080b93800e1ea4ed5853fa420670a6ac700e8b463000dbea65f8ced8565cfb950c7f51b69154034dcb111e67aca3b964a0061494
43cd6b8af9 doc: add release notes for removal of the -deprecatedrpc=addresses flag (Michael Dietz)
2b1fdc2c6c refactor: minor styling, prefer snake case and same line if (Michael Dietz)
d64deac7b8 refactor: share logic between ScriptPubKeyToUniv and ScriptToUniv (Michael Dietz)
8721638daa rpc: remove deprecated addresses and reqSigs from rpc outputs (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
Resolves#21797 now that we've branched-off to v23 ("addresses" and "reqSigs" deprecated) "ExtractDestinations" should be removed.
`-deprecatedrpc=addresses` was initially added in this PR #20286 (which resolved the original issue #20102).
Some chunks of code and logic are no longer used/necessary with the removal of this, and therefore some minor refactoring is done in this PR as well (separated commits)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 43cd6b8af9🐉
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 43cd6b8af9
jonatack:
ACK 43cd6b8af9 per `git range-diff a9d0cec 92dc5e9 43cd6b8`, also rebased to latest master, debug built + quick re-review of each commit to bring back context, and ran tests locally at the final commit
Tree-SHA512: fba83495e396d3c06f0dcf49292f14f4aa6b68fa758f0503941fade1a6e7271cda8378e2734af1faea550d1b43c85a36c52ebcc9dec0732936f9233b4b97901c
7e3ee4cdd0 GUI: Ask user to unlock wallet before signing psbt (Samuel Dobson)
0f3acecf33 Add test that walletprocesspsbt requires unlocked wallet when signing (Samuel Dobson)
0e895212bb Ensure wallet is unlocked before signing in walletprocesspsbt (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
If signing a PSBT, we need to ensure the wallet is unlocked.
Fixes#22874, fixesbitcoin-core/gui#312
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 7e3ee4cdd0
lsilva01:
Code Review ACK 7e3ee4cdd0
benthecarman:
ACK 7e3ee4cdd0
Tree-SHA512: 6726a873582747900ab454ea21153a92be86808a4c1517dc2856b389876a2da9e8df1ffa9b567b6bd017038342c3544ecf5ca3c97744e7debe0a5ee65563687d
efcaefc7b5 test: Add remaining scenarios of 0 waste (rajarshimaitra)
Pull request description:
As per the [review club](https://bitcoincore.reviews/22009) discussion on #22009 , it was observed that there were other two fee scenarios in which selection waste could be zero.
These are:
- (LTF - Fee) == Change Cost
- (LTF - Fee) == Excess
Even though these are obvious by the definition of waste metric, adding tests for them can be helpful in explaining its behavior
to new readers of the code base, along with pinning the behavior for future.
This PR adds those two cases to waste calculation unit test.
Also let me know if I am missing more scenarios.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Tested re-ACK efcaefc7b5
achow101:
ACK efcaefc7b5
meshcollider:
ACK efcaefc7b5
Tree-SHA512: 13fe3e2c0ea7bb58d34e16c32908b84705130dec16382ff941e5e60ca5b379f9c5811b33f36c4c72d7a98cfbb6af2f196d0a69e96989afa4b9e49893eaadd7cb
With this change, we get more fine-grained error messages if something
goes wrong in the course of communicating with the SQLite database. To
pick some random examples, the error codes SQLITE_IOERR_NOMEM,
SQLITE_IOERR_CORRUPTFS or SQLITE_IOERR_FSYNC are way more specific than just a
plain SQLITE_IOERR, and the corresponding error messages generated by
sqlite3_errstr() will hence give a better hint to the user (or also to the
developers, if an error report is sent) what the cause for a failure is.
93b9800fec scripted-diff: Rename overloaded int GetArg to GetIntArg (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This is meant to improve readability of code and remove guesswork needed to determine argument types and migrate to [typed arguments (#22978)](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22978) by having distinctly named `GetArg` `GetArgs` `GetBoolArg` and `GetIntArg` methods.
---
This commit was originally part of #22766 and had some review discussion there. But it was [wisely suggested](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22766#issuecomment-910001542) to be split off to make that PR smaller.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 93b9800fec.
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 93b9800fec📨
Tree-SHA512: e034bd938b2c8fbadd90bcd52213a61161965dfddf18c2cb0d68816ecf2438cde8afee6fb7e3418f5c6b35c208338da9deb99e4e418dbf68ca34552e0916a625
d2eccacd18 doc: Clarify that change_cost cannot be negative in GetSelectionWaste (benthecarman)
Pull request description:
We assert that the `change_cost` must be positive so we should document it in the function's docs
4f5ad43b1e/src/wallet/coinselection.cpp (L361)
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK d2eccacd18
jarolrod:
ACK d2eccacd18
shaavan:
ACK d2eccacd18
Tree-SHA512: 089bc41d7e212b811455527ce2ac83301eae0edc03933dcbd5229b22078827395c8e3bcfda0ba029b7c60705db3119b4f80e372842a6bd8dae195dbaa0b52833
Before this patch, the log might be corrupted by other threads logging
at the same time. For example, another RPC thread:
[httpworker.1] [default wallet] keypool reserve 1296
[httpworker.1] SelectCoins() best subset: Received a POST request for / from 127.0.0.1:53732
[httpworker.3] ThreadRPCServer method=getnetworkinfo user=__cookie__
[httpworker.1] 0.78125 0.1953125 0.02441406 0.00610351 0.00305175 0.00152587 total 1.01025417
Improve readability of code, simplify future scripted diff cleanup PRs, and be
more consistent with naming for GetBoolArg.
This will also be useful for replacing runtime settings type checking
with compile time checking.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
git grep -l GetArg | xargs sed -i 's/GetArg(\([^)]*\( [0-9]\+\|-1\|port\|BaseParams().RPCPort()\|Params().GetDefaultPort()\|_TIMEOUT\|Height\|_WORKQUEUE\|_THREADS\|_CONNECTIONS\|LIMIT\|SigOp\|Bytes\|_VERSION\|_AGE\|_CHECKS\|Checks() ? 1 : 0\|_BANTIME\|Cache\|BLOCKS\|LEVEL\|Weight\|Version\|BUFFER\|TARGET\|WEIGHT\|TXN\|TRANSACTIONS\|ADJUSTMENT\|i64\|Size\|nDefault\|_EXPIRY\|HEIGHT\|SIZE\|SNDHWM\|_TIME_MS\)\))/GetIntArg(\1)/g'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
d96b000e94 Make GUI UTXO lock/unlock persistent (Samuel Dobson)
077154fe69 Add release note for lockunspent change (Samuel Dobson)
719ae927dc Update lockunspent tests for lock persistence (Samuel Dobson)
f13fc16295 Allow lockunspent to store the lock in the wallet DB (Samuel Dobson)
c52789365e Allow locked UTXOs to be store in the wallet database (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
Addresses and closes#22368
As per that issue (and its predecessor #14907), there seems to be some interest in allowing unspent outputs to be locked persistently. This PR does so by adding a flag to lockunspent to store the change in the wallet database. Defaults to false, so there is no change in default behaviour.
Edit: GUI commit changes default behaviour. UTXOs locked/unlocked via the GUI are now persistent.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d96b000e94
kristapsk:
ACK d96b000e94
lsilva01:
Tested ACK d96b000e94 on Ubuntu 20.04
prayank23:
ACK d96b000e94
Tree-SHA512: 957a5bbfe7f763036796906ccb1598feb6c14c5975838be1ba24a198840bf59e83233165cb112cebae909b6b25bf27275a4d7fa425923ef6c788ff671d7a89a8
There are two more cases where waste can be 0, when:
- (Fee - LTF) == -Change Cost
- (Fee - LTF) == -Excess
Adding these two conditions explicitly in the unit test will help
pin the behavior, also demonstrate waste calculation scenarios to new
readers.
98cf19ca32 wallet: refactor: avoid duplicate lookup on `mapValue["timesmart"]` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
973d8ba93d wallet: refactor: inline function WriteOrderPos() (Sebastian Falbesoner)
65ed198295 wallet: refactor: inline function ReadOrderPos() (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The functions `ReadOrderPos` and `WriteOrderPos` have been introduced in commit 9c7722b7c5 in 2012. Since accounts have been removed in #13825 (commit c9c32e6b84), they are only called at one place in `CWalletTx::{Serialize,Unserialize}` and thus can be directly inlined instead. Additionally, this PR aims to avoids duplicate lookups on the map `mapValue` (affects keys "n" and "timesmart").
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 98cf19ca32
achow101:
Code Review ACK 98cf19ca32
Tree-SHA512: 8af63c174c79e589bd713f04e8e40caba9f93ec2978c805427cac50d48049808a8c23ff5eea9ef589c9bd79fc66087f43ff5ab28e3cda51dd03f37c0164e2e4c
e4709c7b56 Start using init makeNode, makeChain, etc methods (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Use `interfaces::Init::make*` methods instead of `interfaces::Make*` functions, so interfaces can be constructed differently in different executable without having to change any code. (So for example `bitcoin-gui` can make an `interfaces::Node` pointer that communicates with a `bitcoin-node` subprocess, while `bitcoin-qt` can make an `interfaces::Node` pointer that controls node code in the same process.)
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10). The commit was first part of larger PR #10102.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
reACK e4709c7b56
achow101:
ACK e4709c7b56
benthecarman:
utACK e4709c7b56
Tree-SHA512: 580c1979dbb2ef444157c8e53041e70d15ddeee77e5cbdb34f70b6d228cc2d2fe3843825f172da84e506200c58f7e0932f7cd4c006bb5058c1f4e43259394834
Since accounts were removed in commit c9c32e6b84,
this function is only called at one place and thus can be as well inlined. Also,
avoid a duplicate lookup by using the find() method and dereference, instead of
calling count() and operator[].
fa57fa1a2e Enable clang-tidy bugprone-argument-comment and fix violations (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Named arguments can be dangerous when they are wrong, because they are not enforced by the compiler. Currently there are only minor typos, no actual bugs.
Fix the typos and add the `.clang-tidy` file to make it easier to find them in the future.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa57fa1a2e
fanquake:
ACK fa57fa1a2e
Tree-SHA512: b66f01e0a1e77e56ed8454002176df660cc2cc0947a90785aa33cc5b8003a1f99fd8b2f8f89f2a0bf180ff2c42c031d69e669d127bb557b879c17975275a220b
