e844115dea test: use MiniWallet for rpc_scantxoutset.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
983ca0456c test: introduce `address_to_scriptpubkey` helper (Sebastian Falbesoner)
e704d4d26f test: introduce `getnewdestination` helper for generating various address types (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR enables one more of the non-wallet functional tests (rpc_scantxoutset.py) to be run even with the Bitcoin Core wallet disabled by using the MiniWallet instead, as proposed in #20078 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23858#issue-1088320649 more recently.
Reviewer's guide:
* [commit 1/3] For replacing the getnewaddress/getaddressinfo RPC calls a helper `getnewdestination` is introduced which allows to create addresses with the common address format types ('legacy', 'p2sh-segwit' and 'bech32'), but also additionally returns the corresponding pubkey and output script.
* [commit 2/3] In order to send to addresses with MiniWallet, a helper `address_to_scriptpubkey` is introduced. It only supports legacy addresses (Base58Check) so far, which is sufficient for the scantxoutset test.
* [commit 3/3] With those helpers, the use of MiniWallet in the test is quite straight-forward. To avoid repeatedly specifying parameters like `from_node` to MiniWallet's `send_to` method, another test-internal helper `sendtodestination` is introduced which supports specifying the destination both as outputscript or as address.
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
reACK [e844115](e844115dea)
Tree-SHA512: e4823dc507019b2b8e479602963c5dddc4c78211e1d934218ee0f0e32c068ab7e44e9793307f549127946364f57d684c4ea1d70f25865ea70d30d4f3855836d0
d3b0f82a43 build: Fix regression introduced in PR23603 (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
It appears 7629efcc2c from bitcoin/bitcoin#23603 introduced a regression in build tool flag evaluation.
On macOS system:
- pre-PR23603 master (ae017b8160):
```
% make -C depends print-darwin_CXXFLAGS
darwin_CXXFLAGS=-pipe
% make -C depends print-host_CXXFLAGS
host_CXXFLAGS=-pipe
```
- the current master (369978686e):
```
% make -C depends print-darwin_CXXFLAGS
darwin_CXXFLAGS=-pipe
% make -C depends print-host_CXXFLAGS
host_CXXFLAGS=-arch x86_64
```
It's obvious a flag being set in `depends/hosts/darwin.mk`, i.e., `-pipe`, is lost.
With this PR:
```
% make -C depends print-darwin_CXXFLAGS
darwin_CXXFLAGS=-pipe
% make -C depends print-host_CXXFLAGS
host_CXXFLAGS=-pipe -arch x86_64
```
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK d3b0f82a43
Tree-SHA512: 643099ce6858475ac9f3a4dfa72a4e493fec6fdd7042ae0f0d5fe44c5cd175e4eda63cb39fc46ac1501cadcd3466507ec88d9089235e005fe43ea7ab47ce37c1
11736dbe3d build, qt: Hardcode last modified timestamp in Qt RCC (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Our Guix build system sets the [`SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH`](https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/) and propagates it to the depends build subsystem. Its [default value](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/guix/README.md#recognized-environment-variables) is the top commit timestamp.
After bumping Qt version up to 5.15.2, due to [this](1ffcca4cc2) change, every time they are going to make new Guix builds for another branch/commit they must ensure that the `qt` package will be rebuilt from scratch. Otherwise, Bitcoin Core GUI binaries will be non-deterministic.
Such behavior makes working with Guix builds suboptimal.
This PR fixes the described issue by patching Qt RCC and hardcoding last modified timestamps with `1`.
It's worth to mention that this change is compatible with a possible future [improvement](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21995) which makes each dependency package reproducible.
A drawback of such an approach is not currently applied to our project, as it effectively makes [QML cache files](https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-57182) useless. I can't say it's a problem for the https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui-qml project.
---
**A note for thinkers:** For now this change is enough as only Qt source contains `SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH`. But in general we should re-think about treating the `SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH` variable in the depends build subsystem. For instance, its default value could be the output of `git log --format=%at -1 -- depends`.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 11736dbe3d
Tree-SHA512: 31f104010a0a78d217aafcc5bc4606351f9060fc2a827277935b85fc8ced9f3d90a31d812c7db8c2711fb6daccd279cf0945dc1d7a7199e0eb0ade451cdbcd5d
94a7f09de6 doc: Drop outdated note (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
It is outdated since bitcoin/bitcoin#23060.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 94a7f09de6
theStack:
Code-review ACK 94a7f09de6
Tree-SHA512: 5a98cf39c3939845d1abb64cb62dbb9bdb1135aa07a5cd0d85de7b6a6d9a3397b0e5da06cdb89991aac31151cb3c0d38eacf4898c53014cb7f7600e992230f87
This serves as a replacement for the getnewaddress RPC if no wallet is
available. In addition to the address, it also returns the corresponding
public key and output script (scriptPubKey).
fafe4dea16 test: Fix pep8 of touched file (MarcoFalke)
fa0ac9d7e3 test: Fix rpc_scantxoutset intermittent issue (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
I fail to see how this could have ever worked, since there is nothing that prevents the wallet from spending the coins in the utxo set.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23847
Longer term it would be nice to remove the wallet and use MiniWallet here.
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
tACK fafe4dea16
theStack:
Code-review ACK fafe4dea16
Tree-SHA512: d92b7be9a81eb62f496488dd15b8e564e9b7a64b55634af2714b53f985e6a35fdae788323833ff59c40ae7c6a0cf54fe069db8eb3be03686f7c100379f54a292
faaf9da20a test: Add missing suppressions for crypto_diff_fuzz_chacha20.cpp (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Without them, CI and fuzzing is broken
ACKs for top commit:
stratospher:
ACK faaf9da. The changes look good to me.
Tree-SHA512: 46604ba1b6eb8ea321e55e043835ca1e7a4f562855007b08cf9cf96d9a7f2a0155009ca1397f34338e478b8cc5b5a6a0dc94e1878a2f00bfab11595ae58bb014
7b481f015a Fix Racy ParseOpCode function initialization (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
If multiple callers call ParseOpCode concurrently it will cause a race condition. We can either move the static to it's own area and require init be called explicitly, or just allow concurrent first callers to race to fill in an atomic variable that never changes thereafter. The second approach is taken here.
Static initialization *is* threadsafe, but only insofar as definining the variable being guaranteed to be called once. This is used incorrectly here.
practicalswift --> are there tools we can deploy to catch usage like this?
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 7b481f015a 🗣
Tree-SHA512: cbf9dc3af26d7335305026f32ce8472a018309b89b3d81a67357e59fbeed72c37b5b8a6e30325ea68145c3b2403867be82de01f22decefb6e6717cf0c0045633
2da97b271b ci: use GCC 8 when building packages in native_qt5 CI (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Our minimum required GCC is GCC 8, and this change in required for
PRs like #23839 which take advantage of flags introduced in that
version of GCC.
This should have been included as part of 182de7ba10.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 2da97b271b
hebasto:
ACK 2da97b271b
Tree-SHA512: 2b64c21119fb95b959ac0f7d8d2d38f6ed98309695bb35425fad45b3b628247c2c78d0647c4d1f511669e8d333c6febe1cc44fac8027ed0bd7593eb630add548
ff5f6dea53 scripted-diff: Rename interfaces::WalletClient to interfaces::WalletLoader (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Name has been confusing since it was introduced, and it was pointed in recent review club https://bitcoincore.reviews/10102 that it was particularly unclear how `interfaces::WalletClient` was different from `interfaces::Wallet`.
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
ACK ff5f6de
Tree-SHA512: 26fa10baa457e76da1933adab187e9be61b8d76cff1cf2c73ad4320461c7e31fb9db07b7c2486998294826beb4a1aca255c14903920b443db6213e653c5f7e0a
826e12b010 test: call VerifyLoadedChainstate during ChainTestingSetup (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
for additional coverage and similarity to actual init process.
Followup to #23280.
ACKs for top commit:
dongcarl:
Code Review ACK 826e12b010
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 826e12b010
Tree-SHA512: a4e7fd25e5d7a08b1e154ae6daf67c3048260a2684b0e569b544dd826693b7b969db9923b191e499cb8d8d0a2a73eb9330ff45909313145a9abb6052eb8c3ad9
Our minimum required GCC is GCC 8, and this change in required for
changes like #23839 which take advantage of flags introduced in that
version of GCC.
This should have been included as part of
182de7ba10.
Name has been confusing since it was introduced, and it was pointed in
recent review club as https://bitcoincore.reviews/10102 that it was
particularly unclear how interfaces::WalletClient was different from
interfaces::Wallet.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
ren() { git grep -l "$1" src | xargs sed -i "s/$1/$2/g"; }
ren WalletClient WalletLoader
ren walletClient walletLoader
ren wallet_client wallet_loader
ren "wallet clients release the wallet" "wallet pointer owners release the wallet"
ren "wallet client" "wallet loader"
ren "Wallet client" "Wallet loader"
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
c9a77e227e gui: address type dropdown, add bech32m (Sjors Provoost)
56113daef4 wallet: add taprootEnabled() to interface (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
This PR replaces the Bech32 checkbox with an address type dropdown It "Use Taproot" checkbox to the receive screen for any wallet with a Taproot descriptor. The Bech32m option is hidden for wallets that don't have taproot descriptors.
Bech32 is kept as the default even for Taproot enabled wallets until it's more widely supported.
(an earlier attempt of this PR added a second checkbox)
<img width="469" alt="Schermafbeelding 2021-12-21 om 11 44 05" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/146872660-339fae1f-c0b8-4673-b8be-33c25f3933fd.png">
**Suggested testing**
* notice that the Bech32m entry only appears for wallet with a taproot descriptor
* verify that it generates a bc1p instead of bc1q address
1. Legacy wallet
2. Default descriptor wallet (current does not have taproot descriptor)
3. Wallet with taproot descriptor:
* just create a new descriptor wallet
Replaces https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22260
ACKs for top commit:
Rspigler:
tACK c9a77e227e. I like the changes made now, thanks!
kristapsk:
re-ACK c9a77e227e
Tree-SHA512: bae66ac90ed55372e6c94878db0e37d32b7b5c24ed00c0f2ebb10fd127dddce3a061162df915d67e92d7b35b3da093137db17b73931a0ae1a470fff20be1f30b
a2a92317ad rpc: Add warning to user about newkeypool command (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
This PR prevents `newkeypool` from being run on non-HD wallets, because this would require a new backup every time, so it isn't very safe.
David Harding also suggested [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23093#issuecomment-945350003) that the RPC help text should include a warning to the users about the interaction between newkeypool.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a2a92317ad
Tree-SHA512: 0aa497900f1d179764bce13ffce0bb081ba2ca354492bf2e04b21d0212e960b3ed13a386fbf65602b6b50461f4056a0285752ef707d312da28e82449cd8ea048
