61f4b9b7ad Manage exceptions in bcc callback functions (virtu)
Pull request description:
Address #27380 (and similar future issues) by handling failed `assert_equal()` assertions in bcc callback functions
### Problem
Exceptions are not propagated in ctype callback functions used by bcc. This means an AssertionError exception raised by `assert_equal()` to signal a failed assertion is not getting caught and properly logged. Instead, the error is logged to stdout and execution of the callback stops.
The current workaround to check whether all `assert_equal()` assertions in a callback succeeded is to increment a success counter after the assertions (which only gets incremented if none exception is raised and stops execution). Then, outside the callback, the success counter can be used to check whether a callback executed successfully.
One issue with the described workaround is that when an exception occurs, there is no way of telling which of the `assert_equal()` statements caused the exception; moreover, there is no way of inspecting how the pieces of data that got compared in `assert_equal()` differed (often a crucial clue when debugging what went wrong).
This problem is happening in #27380: Sporadically, in the `mempool:rejected` test, execution does not reach the end of the callback function and the success counter is not incremented. Thus, the test fails when comparing the counter to its expected value of one. Without knowing which of the asserts failed any why it failed, this issue is hard to debug.
### Solution
Two fixes come to mind. The first involves having the callback function make event data accessible outside the callback and inspecting the event using `assert_equal()` outside the callback. This solution still requires a counter in the callback in order to tell whether a callback was actually executed or if instead the call to perf_buffer_poll() timed out.
The second fix entails wrapping all relevant `assert_equal()` statements inside callback functions into try-catch blocks and manually logging AssertionErrors. While not as elegant in terms of design, this approach can be more pragmatic for more complex tests (e.g., ones involving multiple events, events of different types, or the order of events).
The solution proposed here is to select the most pragmatic fix on a case-by-case basis: Tests in `interface_usdt_net.py`, `interface_usdt_mempool.py` and `interface_usdt_validation.py` have been refactored to use the first approach, while the second approach was chosen for `interface_usdt_utxocache.py` (partly to provide a reference for the second approach, but mainly because the utxocache tests are the most intricate tests, and refactoring them to use the first approach would negatively impact their readability). Lastly, `interface_usdt_coinselection.py` was kept unchanged because it does not use `assert_equal()` statements inside callback functions.
ACKs for top commit:
0xB10C:
Reviewed the changes since my last review. ACK 61f4b9b7ad. I've tested that the combined log contains both exceptions by modifying `interface_usdt_utxocache.py`.
willcl-ark:
utACK 61f4b9b
stickies-v:
utACK 61f4b9b7a
Tree-SHA512: 85cdaabf370d4f09a9eab6af9ce7c796cd9d08cb91f38f021f71adda34c5f643331022dd09cadb95be2185dad6016c95cbb8942e41e4fbd566a49bf431c5141a
28fff06afe test: Make linter to look for `BOOST_ASSERT` macros (Hennadii Stepanov)
47fe551e52 test: Kill `BOOST_ASSERT` (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
One of the goals of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27783 was to get rid of the `BOOST_ASSERT` macros instead of including the `boost/assert.hpp` headers. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27783#discussion_r1210612717.
It turns out that a couple of those macros sneaked into the codebase in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27790.
This PR makes the linter guard against new instances of the `BOOST_ASSERT` macros and replaces the current ones.
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
ACK [28fff06](28fff06afe)
stickies-v:
ACK 28fff06af
TheCharlatan:
ACK 28fff06afe
Tree-SHA512: 371f613592cf677afe0196d18c83943c6c8f1e998f57b4ff3ee58bfeff8636e4dac1357840d8611b4f7b197def94df10fe1a8ca3282b00b7b4eff4624552dda8
1a572ce7d6 test: refactor: introduce `generate_keypair` helper with WIF support (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
In functional tests it is a quite common scenario to generate fresh elliptic curve keypairs, which is currently a bit cumbersome as it involves multiple steps, e.g.:
privkey = ECKey()
privkey.generate()
privkey_wif = bytes_to_wif(privkey.get_bytes())
pubkey = privkey.get_pubkey().get_bytes()
Simplify this by providing a new `generate_keypair` helper function that returns the private key either as `ECKey` object or as WIF-string (depending on the boolean `wif` parameter) and the public key as byte-string; these formats are what we mostly need (currently we don't use `ECPubKey` objects from generated keypairs anywhere).
With this, most of the affected code blocks following the pattern above can be replaced by one-liners, e.g.:
privkey, pubkey = generate_keypair(wif=True)
Note that after this commit, the only direct uses of `ECKey` remain in situations where we want to set the private key explicitly, e.g. in MiniWallet (test/functional/test_framework/wallet.py) or the test for the signet miner script (test/functional/tool_signet_miner.py).
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 1a572ce7d6
kevkevinpal:
reACK [1a572ce](1a572ce7d6)
stratospher:
ACK 1a572ce7. neat to have this since keypair generation is done in lots of places.
Tree-SHA512: ceb695ba7b34dc9f65357b55be03e67609e7e13a178083d405284eff4d8d3c5cea4fb0b6632658604a533f38ebfefc33e0c375995cc21ebc7843442ad764287b
0000f55293 ci: Run fuzz target even if input folder is empty (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This should catch trivial integer sanitizer bugs if the author and all reviewers forget to look for them.
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
reACK 0000f55293
dergoegge:
reACK 0000f55293
Tree-SHA512: f139b9d56f0cf1aae339c2890721c77c88d1fea77b73d492c1386ec99b4f393c5b664029919ff4a22e4e8a2929f085699a148c6acc2cc3e40df8a72fd39ff474
fa76f0d0ef refactor: Make m_count_with_* in CTxMemPoolEntry int64_t, drop UBSAN supp (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is a refactor as long as no signed integer overflow appears. In normal operation and absent bugs, signed integer overflow should never happen in the touched code paths.
The main benefit of this refactor is to drop the file-wide ubsan suppression `unsigned-integer-overflow:txmempool.cpp`.
For now, this only changes the internal private representation and the publicly returned type remains `uint64_t`.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
ACK fa76f0d0ef
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa76f0d0ef
Tree-SHA512: a09e33a915d60c65d369d44ba1a45ce4a6a76e6dc2bea43216ba02b5eab0b74e214b2c7cc44360493f2c483d18d96e4636b7a75b23050976efc80e38de852c39
a1e653828b test: Add test for migrating default wallet and plain file wallet (Andrew Chow)
bdbe3fd76b wallet: Generated migrated wallet's path from walletdir and name (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes an assertion error that is hit during the setup of the new database during migration of a wallet that was not contained in a wallet dir. Also added a test for this case as well as one for migrating the default wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK a1e653828b
furszy:
ACK a1e65382
Tree-SHA512: 96b218c0de8567d8650ec96e1bf58b0f8ca4c4726f5efc6362453979b56b9d569baea0bb09befb3a5aed8d16d29bf75ed5cd8ffc432bbd4cbcad3ac5574bc479
daa5a658c0 refactor: rename BCLog::BLOCKSTORE to BLOCKSTORAGE (Jon Atack)
cf622b214b doc: release note re raising on invalid -debug/debugexclude/loglevel (Jon Atack)
6cb1c66041 init: remove config option names from translated -loglevel strings (Jon Atack)
2547829272 test: -loglevel raises on invalid values (Jon Atack)
a9c295888b init: raise on invalid loglevel config option (Jon Atack)
b0c3995393 test: -debug and -debugexclude raise on invalid values (Jon Atack)
4c3c19d943 init: raise on invalid debug/debugexclude config options (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
and rename BCLog::BLOCKSTORE to BLOCKSTORAGE so the enum is the same as its value like the other BCLog enums.
Per discussion in bitcoin-core-dev IRC today from https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2023-05-11#921458.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK daa5a658c0
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK daa5a658c0. Just translated string template cleanup since last review
pinheadmz:
re-ACK daa5a658c0
Tree-SHA512: 4c107a93d8e8ce4e2ee81d44aec672526ca354ec390b241221067f68204beac8b4ba7a65748bcfa124ff2245c4307fa9243ec4fe0b464d0fa69c787fb322c3cc
d2b39e09bc test: ensure old fee_estimate.dat not read on restart and flushed (ismaelsadeeq)
cf219f29f3 tx fees, policy: read stale fee estimates with a regtest-only option (ismaelsadeeq)
3eb241a141 tx fees, policy: do not read estimates of old fee_estimates.dat (ismaelsadeeq)
5b886f2b43 tx fees, policy: periodically flush fee estimates to fee_estimates.dat (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
Fixes#27555
The issue arises when an old `fee_estimates.dat` file is sometimes read during initialization.
Or after an unclean shutdown, the latest fee estimates are not flushed to `fee_estimates.dat`.
If the fee estimates in the old file are old, they can cause transactions to become stuck in the mempool.
This PR ensures that nodes do not use stale estimates from the old file during initialization. If `fee_estimates.dat`
has not been updated for 60 hours or more, it is considered stale and will not be read during initialization. To avoid
having old estimates, the `fee_estimates.dat` file will be flushed periodically every hour. As mentioned #27555
> "The immediate improvement would be to store fee estimates to disk once an hour or so to reduce the chance of having an old file. From there, this case could probably be detected, and refuse to serve estimates until we sync."
In addition, I will follow-up PR to persist the `mempoolminfee` across restarts.
ACKs for top commit:
willcl-ark:
ACK d2b39e09bc
instagibbs:
reACK d2b39e09bc
glozow:
ACK d2b39e09bc. One nit if you follow up.
Tree-SHA512: 4f6e0c296995d0eea5cf80c6aefdd79b7295a6a0ba446f2166f32afc105fe4f831cfda1ad3abd13c5c752b4fbea982cf4b97eaeda2af1fd7184670d41edcfeec
In functional tests it is a quite common scenario to generate fresh
elliptic curve keypairs, which is currently a bit cumbersome as it
involves multiple steps, e.g.:
privkey = ECKey()
privkey.generate()
privkey_wif = bytes_to_wif(privkey.get_bytes())
pubkey = privkey.get_pubkey().get_bytes()
Simplify this by providing a new `generate_keypair` helper function that
returns the private key either as `ECKey` object or as WIF-string
(depending on the boolean `wif` parameter) and the public key as
byte-string; these formats are what we mostly need (currently we don't
use `ECPubKey` objects from generated keypairs anywhere).
With this, most of the affected code blocks following the pattern above
can be replaced by one-liners, e.g.:
privkey, pubkey = generate_keypair(wif=True)
Note that after this commit, the only direct uses of `ECKey` remain in
situations where we want to set the private key explicitly, e.g. in
MiniWallet (test/functional/test_framework/wallet.py) or the test for
the signet miner script (test/functional/tool_signet_miner.py).
Exceptions are not propagated in ctype callback functions used by bcc.
This means an AssertionError exception raised by check_equal() to signal
a failed assertion is not getting caught and properly logged. Instead,
the error is logged to stdout and execution of the handler stops.
The current workaround to check whether all check_equal() assertions in
a callback succeeded is to increment a success counter after the
assertions (which only gets incremented if none exception is raised and
stops execution). Then, outside the callback, the success counter can be
used to check whether a callback executed successfully.
One issue with the described workaround is that when an exception
occurs, there is no way of telling which of the check_equal() statements
caused the exception; moreover, there is no way of inspecting how the
pieces of data that got compared in check_equal() differed (often
a crucial clue when debugging what went wrong).
Two fixes to this problem come to mind. The first involves having the
callback function make event data accessible outside the callback and
inspecting the event using check_equal() outside the callback. This
solution still requires a counter in the callback to tell whether
a callback was actually executed or if instead the call to
perf_buffer_poll() timed out.
The second fix entails wrapping all relevant check_equal() statements
inside callback functions into try-catch blocks and manually logging
AssertionErrors. While not as elegant in terms of design, this approach
can be more pragmatic for more complex tests (e.g., ones involving
multiple events, events of different types, or the order of events).
The solution proposed here is to select the most pragmatic fix on
a case-by-case basis: Tests in interface_usdt_net.py,
interface_usdt_mempool.py and interface_usdt_validation.py have been
refactored to use the first approach, while the second approach was
chosen for interface_usdt_utxocache.py (partly to provide a reference
for the second approach, but mainly because the utxocache tests are the
most intricate tests, and refactoring them to use the first approach
would negatively impact their readability). Lastly,
interface_usdt_coinselection.py was kept unchanged because it does not
use check_equal() statements inside callback functions.
5524fa00fa doc: add release note about removal of `deprecatedrpc=walletwarningfield` flag (Sebastian Falbesoner)
5c77db7354 Restorewallet/createwallet help documentation fixups/improvements (Jon Atack)
a00ae31fcc rpc: remove deprecated "warning" field from {create,load,restore,unload}wallet (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The "warning" string field for wallet creating/loading RPCs (`createwallet`, `loadwallet`, `unloadwallet` and `restorewallet`) has been deprecated with the configuration option `-deprecatedrpc=walletwarningfield` in PR #27279 (released in v25.0). For the next release v26.0, the field and the configuration option can be removed.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 5524fa00fa
jonatack:
ACK 5524fa00fa
Tree-SHA512: 8212f72067d08095304018b8a95d2ebef630004b65123483fbbfb078cc5709c2d825bbc35b16ea5f6b28ae7377347382d7e9afaf7bdbf0575d2c229d970784de
a97c59f12d test: p2p: check misbehavior for non-continuous headers messages (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for a peer sending a `headers` message where the headers don't connect to each other, which should be treated as misbehaving (not disconnecting though, as the score increase is only 20). The relevant code path is `PeerManagerImpl::ProcessHeadersMessage` -> `PeerManagerImpl::CheckHeadersPoW` -> `PeerManagerImpl::CheckHeadersAreContinuous`:
17acb2782a/src/net_processing.cpp (L2415-L2419)17acb2782a/src/net_processing.cpp (L2474-L2484)
ACKs for top commit:
sr-gi:
ACK a97c59f12d
achow101:
ACK a97c59f12d
instagibbs:
ACK a97c59f12d
Tree-SHA512: 3f8d6a2492e5c8b63c7b11be2e4ec455f83581b2c58f2d4e705baadfe8d7c6377296d6cd0eda679d291a13d8930b09443f8e3d183795df34b780c703d5d3aeb3
This commit adds tests to ensure that old fee_estimates.dat files
are not read and that fee_estimates are periodically flushed to the
fee_estimates.dat file.
Additionaly it tests the -regtestonly option -acceptstalefeeestimates.
This is a refactor as long as no signed integer overflow appears. In
normal operation and absent bugs, signed integer overflow should never
happen in the touched code paths.
The main benefit of this refactor is to drop the file-wide ubsan
suppression unsigned-integer-overflow:txmempool.cpp.
For now, this only changes the internal private representation and the
publicly returned type remains uint64_t.
cdba23db35 wallet: Document blank flag use in descriptor wallets (Ryan Ofsky)
43310200dc wallet: Ensure that the blank wallet flag is unset after imports (Andrew Chow)
e9379f1ffa rpc, wallet: Include information about blank flag (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The `blank` wallet flag is used to indicate that the wallet intentionally does not have any keys, scripts, or descriptors, and it prevents the automatic generation of those things for such a wallet. Once the wallet contains any of those data, it is unnecessary, and possibly incorrect, to have `blank` set. This PR fixes a few places where this was not properly happening. It also adds a test for this unset behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
reACK cdba23db35
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK cdba23db35. Only change since last review is dropping the commit which makes createwallet RPC set BLANK flag automatically when DISABLE_PRIVATE_KEYS flag is set
Tree-SHA512: 85bc2a9754df0531575d5c8f4ad7e8f38dcd50083dc29b3283dacf56feae842e81f34654c5e1781f2dadb0560ff80e454bbc8ca3b2d1fab1b236499ae9abd7da
3ef756a5b5 Remove txmempool implicit-integer-sign-change sanitizer suppressions (Hennadii Stepanov)
d2f6d2a95a Use `int32_t` type for most transaction size/weight values (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
From bitcoin/bitcoin#23957 which has been incorporated into this PR:
> A file-wide suppression is problematic because it will wave through future violations, potentially bugs.
>
> Fix that by using per-statement casts.
>
> This refactor doesn't change behavior because the now explicit casts were previously done implicitly.
>
> Similar to commit 8b5a4de904
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 3ef756a5b5
0xB10C:
ACK 3ef756a5b5. I've focused my testing and code review on the tracepoint related changes. The docs, the test, and the mempool_monitor.py demo script are updated. I ran the `interface_usdt_mempool.py` test and the `mempool_monitor.py` script. The `mempool_monitor.py` output looks correct.
Xekyo:
codereview ACK 3ef756a5b5
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 3ef756a5b5. Since last review, just rebased with more type changes in test and tracing code
Tree-SHA512: 397407f72165b6fb85ff1794eb1447836c4f903efed1a05d7a9704c88aa9b86f330063964370bbd59f6b5e322e04e7ea8e467805d58dce381e68f7596433330f
ee2417ed61 test: fix intermittent failure in p2p_leak_tx.py (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
Fixes#27860
The problem was that the replacement tx `tx_b` would sometimes be sent out to the inbound peer after the `notfound`, so that threre would be an unexpected `tx` message and the test fails.
```
node0 2023-06-12T12:48:24.903204Z [msghand] [net.cpp:2856] [PushMessage] [net] sending notfound (73 bytes) peer=1
node0 2023-06-12T12:48:24.903916Z [msghand] [net.cpp:2856] [PushMessage] [net] sending tx (133 bytes) peer=1
File "/tmp/cirrus-ci-build/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/p2p_leak_tx.py", line 74, in test_notfound_on_replaced_tx
assert "tx" not in inbound_peer.last_message
```
Fix this by letting the peer wait for the initial broadcast of the replacement tx before continuing with the test.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK ee2417ed61
Tree-SHA512: ecc8fb44cac6097a949e4ee622f6f654f49851d7966359532ab3af4c5ed9d587bf08110820b473a616cde3ae6fc8d0da9bb3cee39347655a8c433e819d4d1065
7d452d826a test: add coverage for `/deploymentinfo` passing a blockhash (brunoerg)
ce887eaf49 rest: bugfix, fix crash error when calling `/deploymentinfo` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Calling `/deploymentinfo` passing a valid blockhash makes bitcoind to crash. It happens because we're pushing a JSON value of type array when it expects type object. See:
```cpp
jsonRequest.params = UniValue(UniValue::VARR);
```
```cpp
jsonRequest.params.pushKV("blockhash", hash_str);
```
This PR fixes it by changing `pushKV` to `push_back` and adds more test coverage.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 7d452d826a
stickies-v:
ACK 7d452d826a
Tree-SHA512: f01551e556aba2380c3eaed0bc59057304302c202d317d7c1eec5f7ef839851f672aed80819a8719cb1cbbad2aad735d6d44314ac7d6d98bff8217f5a16c312b
61c569ab60 refactor: decouple early return commands from AppInit (furszy)
4927167f85 gui: return EXIT_FAILURE on post-init fatal errors (furszy)
3b2c61e819 Return EXIT_FAILURE on post-init fatal errors (furszy)
3c06926cf2 refactor: index: use `AbortNode` in fatal error helper (Sebastian Falbesoner)
9ddf7e03a3 move ThreadImport ABC error to use AbortNode (furszy)
Pull request description:
It seems odd to return `EXIT_SUCCESS` when the node aborted execution due a fatal internal error
or any post-init problem that triggers an unrequested shutdown.
e.g. blocks or coins db I/O errors, disconnect block failure, failure during thread import (external
blocks loading process error), among others.
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK 61c569ab60
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 61c569ab60
pinheadmz:
ACK 61c569ab60
theStack:
Code-review ACK 61c569ab60
Tree-SHA512: 18a59c3acc1c6d12cbc74a20a401e89659740c6477fccb59070c9f97922dfe588468e9e5eef56c5f395762187c34179a5e3954aa5b844787fa13da2e666c63d3
It seems odd to return `EXIT_SUCCESS` when the node aborted
execution due a fatal internal error or any post-init problem
that triggers an unrequested shutdown.
e.g. blocks or coins db I/O errors, disconnect block failure,
failure during thread import (external blocks loading process
error), among others.
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
67b7fecacd [mempool] clear mapDeltas entry if prioritisetransaction sets delta to 0 (glozow)
c1061acb9d [functional test] prioritisation is not removed during replacement and expiry (glozow)
0e5874f0b0 [functional test] getprioritisedtransactions RPC (glozow)
99f8046829 [rpc] add getprioritisedtransactions (glozow)
9e9ca36c80 [mempool] add GetPrioritisedTransactions (glozow)
Pull request description:
Add an RPC to get prioritised transactions (also tells you whether the tx is in mempool or not), helping users clean up `mapDeltas` manually. When `CTxMemPool::PrioritiseTransaction` sets a delta to 0, remove the entry from `mapDeltas`.
Motivation / Background
- `mapDeltas` entries are never removed from mapDeltas except when the tx is mined in a block or conflicted.
- Mostly it is a feature to allow `prioritisetransaction` for a tx that isn't in the mempool {yet, anymore}. A user can may resbumit a tx and it retains its priority, or mark a tx as "definitely accept" before it is seen.
- Since #8448, `mapDeltas` is persisted to mempool.dat and loaded on restart. This is also good, otherwise we lose prioritisation on restart.
- Note the removal due to block/conflict is only done when `removeForBlock` is called, i.e. when the block is received. If you load a mempool.dat containing `mapDeltas` with transactions that were mined already (e.g. the file was saved prior to the last few blocks), you don't delete them.
- Related: #4818 and #6464.
- There is no way to query the node for not-in-mempool `mapDeltas`. If you add a priority and forget what the value was, the only way to get that information is to inspect mempool.dat.
- Calling `prioritisetransaction` with an inverse value does not remove it from `mapDeltas`, it just sets the value to 0. It disappears on a restart (`LoadMempool` checks if delta is 0), but that might not happen for a while.
Added together, if a user calls `prioritisetransaction` very regularly and not all those transactions get mined/conflicted, `mapDeltas` might keep lots of entries of delta=0 around. A user should clean up the not-in-mempool prioritisations, but that's currently difficult without keeping track of what those txids/amounts are.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 67b7fecacd
theStack:
Code-review ACK 67b7fecacd
instagibbs:
code review ACK 67b7fecacd
ajtowns:
ACK 67b7fecacd code review only, some nits
Tree-SHA512: 9df48b622ef27f33db1a2748f682bb3f16abe8172fcb7ac3c1a3e1654121ffb9b31aeaad5570c4162261f7e2ff5b5912ddc61a1b8beac0e9f346a86f5952260a
a7b46a1fea test: added coverage to mining_basic.py (kevkevin)
Pull request description:
Included a test that checks if we call submitblock with block.vtx.empty() then it throws an rpc deserialization error, currently we only test if !block.vtx->IsCoinBase() throws an rpc deserialization error
I've tested to make sure this actually doing what I intended by breaking up this if block into two if blocks with different error messages and running the functional test
322ec63b01/src/rpc/mining.cpp (L963)
This change should increase the test coverage for the `submitblock()` rpc in `./src/rpc/mining.cpp`
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK a7b46a1fea
Tree-SHA512: 4078cb1fa879cc9e34438319f73085b521b90a5a95348b23e494cf8e5ac792ec426bc0e1a63e949645e16afebe54c5f35a194f02e20b7273871163d89a5c44e6
2cd28e9fef rpc: Add check for unintended option/parameter name clashes (Ryan Ofsky)
95d7de0964 test: Update python tests to use named parameters instead of options objects (Ryan Ofsky)
96233146dd RPC: Allow RPC methods accepting options to take named parameters (Ryan Ofsky)
702b56d2a8 RPC: Add add OBJ_NAMED_PARAMS type (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Allow RPC methods which take an `options` parameter (`importmulti`, `listunspent`, `fundrawtransaction`, `bumpfee`, `send`, `sendall`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, `simulaterawtransaction`), to accept the options as named parameters, without the need for nested JSON objects.
This makes it possible to make calls like:
```sh
src/bitcoin-cli -named bumpfee txid fee_rate=10
```
instead of
```sh
src/bitcoin-cli -named bumpfee txid options='{"fee_rate": 10}'
```
RPC help is also updated to show options as top level named arguments instead of as nested objects.
<details><summary>diff</summary>
<p>
```diff
@@ -15,16 +15,17 @@
Arguments:
1. txid (string, required) The txid to be bumped
-2. options (json object, optional)
+2. options (json object, optional) Options object that can be used to pass named arguments, listed below.
+
+Named Arguments:
- {
- "conf_target": n, (numeric, optional, default=wallet -txconfirmtarget) Confirmation target in blocks
+conf_target (numeric, optional, default=wallet -txconfirmtarget) Confirmation target in blocks
- "fee_rate": amount, (numeric or string, optional, default=not set, fall back to wallet fee estimation)
+fee_rate (numeric or string, optional, default=not set, fall back to wallet fee estimation)
Specify a fee rate in sat/vB instead of relying on the built-in fee estimator.
Must be at least 1.000 sat/vB higher than the current transaction fee rate.
WARNING: before version 0.21, fee_rate was in BTC/kvB. As of 0.21, fee_rate is in sat/vB.
- "replaceable": bool, (boolean, optional, default=true) Whether the new transaction should still be
+replaceable (boolean, optional, default=true) Whether the new transaction should still be
marked bip-125 replaceable. If true, the sequence numbers in the transaction will
be left unchanged from the original. If false, any input sequence numbers in the
original transaction that were less than 0xfffffffe will be increased to 0xfffffffe
@@ -32,11 +33,10 @@
still be replaceable in practice, for example if it has unconfirmed ancestors which
are replaceable).
- "estimate_mode": "str", (string, optional, default="unset") The fee estimate mode, must be one of (case insensitive):
+estimate_mode (string, optional, default="unset") The fee estimate mode, must be one of (case insensitive):
"unset"
"economical"
"conservative"
- }
Result:
{ (json object)
```
</p>
</details>
**Review suggestion:** To understand this PR, it is probably easiest to review the commits in reverse order because the last commit shows the external API changes, the middle commit shows the internal API changes, and the first commit contains the low-level implementation.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 2cd28e9fef
Tree-SHA512: 50f6e78fa622826dab3f810400d8c1a03a98a090b1f2fea79729c58ad8cff955554bd44c2a5975f62a526b900dda68981862fd7d7d05c17f94f5b5d847317436
This fixes an intermittent error, caused by blocks arriving
out of order due to how compact block relay may revert to headers
processing when the tip hasn't caught up, and resulting in slightly
different pruning behavior.
Making sure that all blocks from the previous tests are synced before
generating more blocks makes this impossible.
See Issue #27749 for more details.
015cc5e588 lint: stop ignoring LIEF imports (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Type stubs are now available as of 0.13.0.
See https://github.com/lief-project/LIEF/issues/650.
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK 015cc5e588
Tree-SHA512: ebb754f293c2a61a0ef64c3552f7c700ceb3054b50fd3f1573e4a9e87773ddeba47bd9875f6ab055043012dbc20aeb71e4d76cd3da535c76651dfb1fbfc66e89
fa6b11a556 test: Throw error when -signetchallenge is non-hex (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Instead of silently parsing non-hex to an empty challenge, throw an error.
Also, add missing includes while touching the file.
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
ACK [fa6b11a](fa6b11a556)
kallewoof:
ACK fa6b11a
TheCharlatan:
Nice, ACK fa6b11a556
Tree-SHA512: 018ebbbf819ba7cdf0c6dd294fdfaa5ddb81b87058a8b9c57b96066d5b07e1656fd78f18e3cef375aebefa191fa515c2c70bc764880fa05f98f526334431a616
89df7987c2 Add wallets_conflicts (Antoine Riard)
dced203162 wallet, tests: mark unconflicted txs as inactive (ishaanam)
096487c4dc wallet: introduce generic recursive tx state updating function (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
This implements a fix for #7315. Previously when a block was disconnected any transactions that were conflicting with transactions mined in that block were not updated to be marked as inactive. The fix implemented here is described on the [Bitcoin DevWiki](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/Wallet-Transaction-Conflict-Tracking#idea-refresh-conflicted). A test which tested the previous behavior has also been updated.
Second attempt at #17543
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 89df7987c2
rajarshimaitra:
tACK 89df7987c2.
glozow:
ACK 89df7987c2
furszy:
Tested ACK 89df7987
Tree-SHA512: 3133b151477e8818302fac29e96de30cd64c09a8fe3a7612074a34ba1a332e69148162e6cb3f1074d9d9c9bab5ef9996967d325d8c4c99ba42b5fe3b66a60546
ffffe622e9 test: Move test_chain_listunspent wallet check from mempool_packages to wallet_basic (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This fixes a bug.
On master:
```
$ ./test/functional/mempool_packages.py --legacy-wallet
File "./test/functional/mempool_packages.py", line 52, in run_test
self.nodes[0].importaddress(self.wallet.get_address())
test_framework.authproxy.JSONRPCException: Bech32m addresses cannot be imported into legacy wallets (-5)
```
On this pull, all tests pass.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
ACK ffffe622e9, thanks for changing! Nice to remove wallet from another non-wallet test.
Tree-SHA512: 842c3b7c2e90285a155b8ed9924ef0c99f7773892be4f1847e5d7ece79c914ea5acee0d71de2ce46c354ee95fb74a03c20c0afb5e49c0b8e1c0ce406df963650
eefe56967b bugfix: Fix incorrect debug.log config file path (Ryan Ofsky)
3746f00be1 init: Error if ignored bitcoin.conf file is found (Ryan Ofsky)
398c3719b0 lint: Fix lint-format-strings false positives when format specifiers have argument positions (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Show an error on startup if a bitcoin datadir that is being used contains a `bitcoin.conf` file that is ignored. There are two cases where this could happen:
- One case reported in [#27246 (comment)](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27246#issuecomment-1470006043) happens when a `bitcoin.conf` file in the default datadir (e.g. `$HOME/.bitcoin/bitcoin.conf`) has a `datadir=/path` line that sets different datadir containing a second `bitcoin.conf` file. Currently the second `bitcoin.conf` file is ignored with no warning.
- Another way this could happen is if a `-conf=` command line argument points to a configuration file with a `datadir=/path` line and that path contains a `bitcoin.conf` file, which is currently ignored.
This change only adds an error message and doesn't change anything about way settings are applied. It also doesn't trigger errors if there are redundant `-datadir` or `-conf` settings pointing at the same configuration file, only if they are pointing at different files and one file is being ignored.
ACKs for top commit:
pinheadmz:
re-ACK eefe56967b
willcl-ark:
re-ACK eefe56967b
TheCharlatan:
ACK eefe56967b
Tree-SHA512: 939a98a4b271b5263d64a2df3054c56fcde94784edf6f010d78693a371c38aa03138ae9cebb026b6164bbd898d8fd0845a61a454fd996e328fd7bcf51c580c2b
