fafd9165e9 test: Add missing sync_all to feature_coinstatsindex (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Sync the blocks before invalidating them to ensure all nodes are on the right tip. Otherwise nodes[0] might stay on the "stale" block and the test fails (intermittently)
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
crACK fafd9165e9
Tree-SHA512: ca567b97b839b56c91d52831eaac18d8c843d376be90c9fd8b49d2eb4a46b801a1d2402996d5dfe2bef3e2c9bd75d19ed443e3f42cc4679c5f20043ba556efc8
Adds an error output parameter to all GetReservedDestination functions
so that callers can get the actual reason that a change address could
not be fetched. This more closely matches GetNewDestination. This allows
for more granular error messages, such as one that indicates that
bech32m addresses cannot be generated yet.
We don't want the legacy wallet to ever have bech32m addresses so don't
allow importing them. This includes addmultisigaddress as that is a
legacy wallet only RPC
Additionally, bech32m multisigs are not available yet, so disallow them
in createmultisig.
If a transaction as a segwit output, use a bech32m change address if
they are available. If not, fallback to bech32. If bech32 change
addresses are unavailable, fallback to the default address type.
Bech32m addresses need their own OutputType
We are not ready to create DescriptorScriptPubKeyMans which produce
bech32m addresses. So don't allow generating them.
fa2d21fec8 add missing atomic include (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`std::atomic` is used in the file, so to avoid compile issues, add the missing include.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa2d21fec8
jamesob:
crACK fa2d21fec8
hebasto:
ACK fa2d21fec8, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
prayank23:
crACK fa2d21fec8
Tree-SHA512: 307b15abd62006be4457b2437fb65de517c296bf0417e8acd181904eb6056dba5655dd5bc43b834bf68a087d06637f5e99ba5a6bc8be3e12388cea470dc155d0
The `on_addr` functionality of `AddrReceiver` tests logic specific to how the
addr messages are set up in the test bodies. To allow other callers to also use
`AddrReceiver`, only apply the assertion logic if the caller indicates
desirability by setting `test_addr_contents` to true when initializing the
class.
fa09fd1a09 doc: Final merge of release notes snippets (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
None of the remaining pulls tagged for 22.0 have snippets, so merge them and move them to the wiki.
Trivial to review with `--color-moved=dimmed-zebra`.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa09fd1a09
jonatack:
ACK fa09fd1a09
Tree-SHA512: d5d272a9fc2217a87988efa189000cae5330da22f0459dd5e4340a18aba3d67d8fe8661016cb777e2e15f5d137c1c2b3de7d576c942eaf4201dabdc4e9c783f4
testshell in jupyter was failing due to an extra arg.
this adds a dummy -f param, which allows TestShell to
be used in a command line or jupyter environment
d6d2ab9845 test: MiniWallet: fix fee calculation for P2PK and check tx vsize (Sebastian Falbesoner)
ce024b1c0e test: MiniWallet: force P2PK signature to have fixed size (71 bytes) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR is a follow-up to #21945. It aims to both fix the fee calculation for P2PK mode transactions and enable its vsize check. Currently, the latter assumes a fixed tx length, which is fine for anyone-can-spend txs but doesn't apply to P2PK output spends due to varying DER signature size; the vsize check is therefore disabled for P2PK mode on master branch.
Creating one million DER signatures with MiniWallet shows the following distribution of sizes (smart people with better math skills probably could deduce the ratios without trying, but hey):
| DER signature size [bytes] | #occurences (ratio) |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| 71 | 498893 (49.89%) |
| 70 | 497244 (49.72%) |
| 69 | 3837 (0.38%) |
| 68 | 22 (0.0022%) |
Note that even smaller signatures are possible (for smaller R and S values with leading zero bytes), it's just that the probability decreases exponentially. Instead of choosing a large vsize check range and hoping that smaller signatures are never created (potentially leading to flaky tests), the proposed solution is ~~to limit the signature size to the two most common sizes 71 and 70 (>99.6% probability) and then accordingly only check for two vsize values; the value to be used for fee calculation is a decimal right between the two possible sizes (167.5 vbytes) and for the vsize check it's rounded down/up integer values are used.~~ to simply grind the signature to a fixed size of 71 bytes (49.89% probability, i.e. on average each call to `sign_tx()`, on average two ECC signing operations are needed).
~~The idea of grinding signatures to a fixed size (similar to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13666 which grinds to low-R values) would be counter-productive, as the signature creation in the test suite is quite expensive and this would significantly slow down tests that calculate hundreds of signatures (like e.g. feature_csv_activation.py).~~
For more about transaction sizes on different input/output types, see the following interesting article: https://medium.com/coinmonks/on-bitcoin-transaction-sizes-97e31bc9d816
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK d6d2ab9845
Tree-SHA512: 011c70ee0e4adf9ba12902e4b6c411db9ae96bdd8bc810bf1d67713367998e28ea328394503371fc1f5087a819547ddaea56c073b28db893ae1c0031d7927f32
b9e76f1bf0 rpc: Add test for -rpcwaittimeout (Christian Decker)
f76cb10d7d rpc: Prefix rpcwaittimeout error with details on its nature (Christian Decker)
c490e17ef6 doc: Add release notes for the `-rpcwaittimeout` cli parameter (Christian Decker)
a7fcc8eb59 rpc: Add a `-rpcwaittimeout` parameter to limit time spent waiting (Christian Decker)
Pull request description:
Adds a new numeric `-rpcwaittimeout` that can be used to limit the
time we spend waiting on the RPC server to appear. This is used by
downstream projects to provide a bit of slack when `bitcoind`s RPC
interface is not available right away.
This makes the `-rpcwait` argument more useful, since we can now limit
how long we'll ultimately wait, before potentially giving up and reporting
an error to the caller. It was discussed in the context of the BTCPayServer
wanting to have c-lightning wait for the RPC interface to become available
but still have the option of giving up eventually ([4355]).
I checked with laanwj whether this is already possible ([comment]), and
whether this would be a welcome change. Initially I intended to repurpose
the (optional) argument to `-rpcwait`, however I decided against it since it
would potentially break existing configurations, using things like `rpcwait=1`,
or `rpcwait=true` (the former would have an unintended short timeout, when
old behavior was to wait indefinitely).
~Due to its simplicity I didn't implement a test for it yet, but if that's desired I
can provide one.~ Test was added during reviews.
[4355]: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/4355
[comment]: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/4355#issuecomment-768288261
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK b9e76f1bf0
promag:
ACK b9e76f1bf0.
Tree-SHA512: 3cd6728038ec7ca7c35c2e7ccb213bfbe963f99a49bb48bbc1e511c4dd23d9957c04f9af1f8ec57120e47b26eaf580b46817b099d5fc5083c98da7aa92db8638
With `banlist.dat` (being written in addrv1 format) if we would try to
write a Tor v3 subnet, it would serialize as a dummy-all-0s IPv6
address and subsequently, when deserialized will not result in the same
subnet.
This problem does not exist with `banlist.json` where the data is saved
in textual, human-readable form.
Save the banlist in `banlist.json` instead of `banlist.dat`.
This makes it possible to store Tor v3 entries in the banlist on disk
(and any other addresses that cannot be serialized in addrv1 format).
Only read `banlist.dat` if it exists and `banlist.json` does not
exist (first start after an upgrade).
Supersedes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20904
Resolves https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19748
4e353cb618 http: Release work queue after event base finish (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This fixes a race between `http_request_cb` and `StopHTTPServer` where
the work queue is used after release.
Fixes#18856.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 4e353cb618
achow101:
ACK 4e353cb618
LarryRuane:
ACK 4e353cb618
hebasto:
ACK 4e353cb618, tested (rebased on top of master 9313c4e6aa) on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) using MarcoFalke's [patch](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19033#issuecomment-640106647), including different `-rpcthreads`/`-rpcworkqueue` cases. The bug is fixed. The code is correct.
Tree-SHA512: 185d2a9744d0d5134d782bf321ac9958ba17b11a5b3d70b4897c8243e6b146dfd3f23c57aef8e10ae9484374120b64389c1949a9cf0a21dccc47ffc934c20930
30aee2dfe6 tests: Add test for compact block HB selection (Pieter Wuille)
6efbcec4de Protect last outbound HB compact block peer (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
If all our high-bandwidth compact block serving peers (BIP 152) stall block
download, then we can be denied a block for (potentially) a long time. As
inbound connections are much more likely to be adversarial than outbound
connections, mitigate this risk by never removing our last outbound HB peer if
it would be replaced by an inbound.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 30aee2dfe6
ariard:
Code ACK 30aee2dfe
jonatack:
ACK 30aee2dfe6
Tree-SHA512: 5c6c9326e3667b97e0864c371ae2174d2be9054dad479f4366127b9cd3ac60ffa01ec9707b16ef29cac122db6916cf56fd9985733390017134ace483278921d5
e8cd3700ee devtools: Integrate ARCH_MIN_GLIBC_VER table into MAX_VERSIONS in symbol-check.py (W. J. van der Laan)
a33381acf5 devtools: Add xkb version to symbol-check (W. J. van der Laan)
19e598bab0 devtools: Fix verneed section parsing in pixie (W. J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
I misunderstood the ELF specification for version symbols (verneed): The `vn_aux` pointer is relative to the main verneed record, not the start of the section.
This caused many symbols to not be versioned properly in the return value of `elf.dyn_symbols`. This was discovered in #21454.
Fix it by correcting the offset computation.
- xkb versions symbols (using the prefix `V`), as this library is used by bitcoin-qt, add it to the valid versions in `symbol-check.py`
This unfortunately brings to light some symbols that have been introduced since and weren't caught (from a gitian compile of master):
```
bitcoin-cli: symbol getrandom from unsupported version GLIBC_2.25
bitcoin-cli: failed IMPORTED_SYMBOLS
bitcoind: symbol getrandom from unsupported version GLIBC_2.25
bitcoind: symbol log from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
bitcoind: symbol fcntl64 from unsupported version GLIBC_2.28
bitcoind: symbol pow from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
bitcoind: symbol exp from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
bitcoind: failed IMPORTED_SYMBOLS
bitcoin-qt: symbol exp from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
bitcoin-qt: symbol fcntl64 from unsupported version GLIBC_2.28
bitcoin-qt: symbol log from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
bitcoin-qt: symbol pow from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
bitcoin-qt: symbol statx from unsupported version GLIBC_2.28
bitcoin-qt: symbol getrandom from unsupported version GLIBC_2.25
bitcoin-qt: symbol renameat2 from unsupported version GLIBC_2.28
bitcoin-qt: symbol getentropy from unsupported version GLIBC_2.25
bitcoin-qt: failed IMPORTED_SYMBOLS
bitcoin-wallet: symbol exp from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
bitcoin-wallet: symbol log from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
bitcoin-wallet: symbol fcntl64 from unsupported version GLIBC_2.28
bitcoin-wallet: failed IMPORTED_SYMBOLS
test_bitcoin: symbol getrandom from unsupported version GLIBC_2.25
test_bitcoin: symbol log from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
test_bitcoin: symbol fcntl64 from unsupported version GLIBC_2.28
test_bitcoin: symbol pow from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
test_bitcoin: symbol exp from unsupported version GLIBC_2.29
test_bitcoin: failed IMPORTED_SYMBOLS
```
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK e8cd3700ee
Tree-SHA512: 8c15e3478eb642f01a1ddaadef03f80583f088f9fa8e3bf171ce16b0ec05ffb4675ec147d7ffc6a4360637ed47fca517c6ca2bac7bb30d794c03783cfb964b79
906d791311 fuzz: add missing ECCVerifyHandle to base_encode_decode (Andrew Poelstra)
Pull request description:
It is possible to trigger a fuzztest failure in the `base_encode_decode` by asking it to decode any PSBT that has HD keypaths in it. For example, this one
```
cHNidP8BAFUCAAAAASeaIyOl37UfxF8iD6WLD8E+HjNCeSqF1+Ns1jM7XLw5AAAAAAD/////AaBa6gsAAAAAGXapFP/pwAYQl8w7Y28ssEYPpPxCfStFiKwAAAAAAAEBIJVe6gsAAAAAF6kUY0UgD2jRieGtwN8cTRbqjxTA2+uHIgIDsTQcy6doO2r08SOM1ul+cWfVafrEfx5I1HVBhENVvUZGMEMCIAQktY7/qqaU4VWepck7v9SokGQiQFXN8HC2dxRpRC0HAh9cjrD+plFtYLisszrWTt5g6Hhb+zqpS5m9+GFR25qaAQEEIgAgdx/RitRZZm3Unz1WTj28QvTIR3TjYK2haBao7UiNVoEBBUdSIQOxNBzLp2g7avTxI4zW6X5xZ9Vp+sR/HkjUdUGEQ1W9RiED3lXR4drIBeP4pYwfv5uUwC89uq/hJ/78pJlfJvggg71SriIGA7E0HMunaDtq9PEjjNbpfnFn1Wn6xH8eSNR1QYRDVb1GELSmumcAAACAAAAAgAQAAIAiBgPeVdHh2sgF4/iljB+/m5TALz26r+En/vykmV8m+CCDvRC0prpnAAAAgAAAAIAFAACAAAA=
```
which I took straight from the PSBT test vectors. The reason is that in src/psbt.h we call `DeserializeHDKeypaths`, which in turn calls `CPubKey::IsFullyValid`, which in turn asserts that a secp context has been created.
The error appears to be masked on many systems by the definition of `instance_of_eccryptoclosure` in src/script/bitcoinconsensus.cpp, which defines a static object which contains an `ECCVerifyHandle`. If you just comment out that line you can reliably trigger the fuzz test failure, e.g. by creating a file `crash` with the above PSBT, and runnnig
```
ASAN_OPTIONS=symbolize=0:detect_stack_use_after_return=1:check_initialization_order=1:strict_init_order=1 UBSAN_OPTIONS=suppressions=./test/sanitizer_suppressions/ubsan:print_stacktrace=1:halt_on_error=1:report_error_type=1 FUZZ=base_encode_decode ./src/test/fuzz/fuzz -seed_inputs=crash
```
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 906d791311
Tree-SHA512: b98b60573c21efe28503fe351883c6f0d9ac99d0dd6f100537b16ac53476617b8a3f899faf0c23d893d34a01b3bbe4a784499ec6f9c7000292e850bed449bd85
fa7d71f270 test: Run pep-8 on touched test (MarcoFalke)
fab7e99c2a test: Use MiniWallet in test_no_inherited_signaling RBF test (MarcoFalke)
fab871f649 test: Remove unused generate() from test (MarcoFalke)
faff3f35b7 test: Add txin.sequence option to MiniWallet (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This comes with nice benefits:
* Less code and complexity
* Test can be run without wallet compiled in
Also add some additional checks for `getmempoolentry` (#22209) and other cleanups 🎨
ACKs for top commit:
mjdietzx:
Tested ACK fa7d71f270 thanks for the explanations, nicely done
theStack:
ACK fa7d71f270🍷
Tree-SHA512: 0e9b8fe985779d8d7034d256deed627125bb374b6ae2972c461b3a220739a51061c6147ad69339bee16282f82716c7f3f8a7a89c693ceb1e47ea50709272332a
