0a50019fde Walk pindexBestHeader back to ChainActive().Tip() if it is invalid (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
Instead of keeping pindexBestHeader set to the best header we've
ever seen, reset it back to our validated tip if we find an ancestor
of it turns out to be invalid. While the name is now a bit confusing,
this matches much better with how it is used in practice, see below.
Further, this opens up more use-cases for it in the future, namely
aggressively searching for new peers in case we have discovered
(possibly via some covert channel) headers which we do not know to be
invalid, but which we cannot find block data for.
Places pindexBestHeader is used:
* Various GUI displays of the best header and getblockchaininfo["headers"],
I don't think changing this is bad, and if anything this is less confusing
in the presence of an invalid block.
* IsCurrentForFeeEstimation(): If anything I think ensuring pindexBestHeader
isn't some crazy invalid chain is better than the alternative, even in the
case where you are rejecting the current chain due to hardware error (since
hopefully in that case you won't get any new blocks anyway).
* ConnectBlock assumevalid checks: We use pindexBestHeader to check that the
block we're connecting leads to something with nMinimumChainWork (preventing
a user-set assumevalid from having bogus work) and that the block we're
connecting leads to pindexBestHeader (I'm not too worried about this one -
it's nice to "disable" assumevalid if we have a long invalid headers chain,
but I don't see it as a critical protection).
* BlockRequestAllowed() uses pindexBestHeader as its target to ensure the
requested block is within a month of the "current chain". I don't think this
is a meaningful difference, if we're rejecting the current tip we're
trivially fingerprintable anyway, and if the chain really does have a bunch
of invalid crap near the tip, using the best not-invalid header is likely a
better criteria.
* ProcessGetBlockData uses pindexBestHeader as the "current chain" definition
of whether a block request is "historical" for the purpose of bandwidth
limiting. Similarly, I don't see why this is a meaningful change.
* We use pindexBestHeader for requesting missing headers on receipt of a
headers/compact block message or block inv as well as for initial getheaders.
I think this is definitely wrong, using the best not-invalid header for such
requests is much better.
* We use pindexBestHeader to define the "current chain" for deciding when
we're close to done with initial headers sync. I don't think this is a
meaningful change.
* We use pindexBestHeader to decide if initial headers sync has timed out. If
we're rejecting the chain due to hardware error this may result in
additional cases where we ban a peer, but this is already true, so I think
its fine.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
ACK 0a50019fde
kallewoof:
ACK 0a50019fde
ariard:
utACK 0a50019
Tree-SHA512: 2ecfa973a9878a00313ae7ede94a9bd7710e0caf55b544b10bbc46dc463a0478cbaf477e6cdd072356d5a0c5fb3848e9339284af785a2995c20bae8bd23f23e5
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
# Delete outdated alias for RecursiveMutex
sed -i -e '/CCriticalSection/d' ./src/sync.h
# Replace use of outdated alias with RecursiveMutex
sed -i -e 's/CCriticalSection/RecursiveMutex/g' $(git grep -l CCriticalSection)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
02b9511d6b tests: add tests for GetCoinsCacheSizeState (James O'Beirne)
b17e91d842 refactoring: introduce CChainState::GetCoinsCacheSizeState (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11):
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/master/proposal
---
This pulls out the routine for detection of how full the coins cache is from
FlushStateToDisk. We use this logic independently when deciding when to flush
the coins cache during UTXO snapshot activation ([see here](231fb5f17e (diff-24efdb00bfbe56b140fb006b562cc70bR5275))).
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
Code review ACK 02b9511.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 02b9511d6b. Just rebase, new COIN_SIZE comment, and new test message since last review
Tree-SHA512: 8bdd78bf68a4a5d33a776e73fcc2857f050d6d102caa4997ed19ca25468c1358e6e728199d61b423033c02e6bc8f00a1d9da52cf17a2d37d70860fca9237ea7c
3bd8db80d8 [validation] fix comments in CheckInputScripts() (John Newbery)
6f6465cefc scripted-diff: [validation] Rename CheckInputs to CheckInputScripts (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
CheckInputs() used to check no double spends, scripts & sigs and amounts. Since
832e074, the double spend and amount checks
have been moved to CheckTxInputs(), and CheckInputs() now just validates
input scripts. Rename the function to CheckInputScripts().
Also fix incorrect comments.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 3bd8db80d8, did the rebase myself, checked the scripted diff 👡
promag:
ACK 3bd8db80d8 :trollface:
Tree-SHA512: 7b3f8597d210492798fb784ee8ea47ea6377519111190161c7cc34a967509013f4337304f52e9bedc97b7710de7b0ff8880e08cd7f867754567f82e7b02c794c
This separates out some logic for detecting how full the coins cache is from
FlushStateToDisk. We'll want to reuse this logic when deciding when to flush
the coins cache during UTXO snapshot activation.
Commit d449772cf6 stopped setting
COINBASE_FLAGS, and it looks like it hasn't been used since P2SH.
Update the help string to remove "flags", which is not specified in
BIP 22.
2f5f7d6b13 GuessVerificationProgress: cap the ratio to 1 (darosior)
Pull request description:
Noticed `getblockchaininfo` would return a `verificationprogress` > 1, especially while generating. This caps the verification progress to `1`.
Tried to append a check to functional tests but this would pass even without the patch, so it seems better to not add a superfluous check (but this can easily be reproduced by trying to generate blocks in the background and `watch`ing `getblockchainfo`).
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 2f5f7d6b13
promag:
ACK 2f5f7d6b13.
Tree-SHA512: fa3aca12acab9c14dab3b2cc94351082f548ea6e6c588987cd86e928a00feb023e8112433658a0e85084e294bfd940eaafa33fb46c4add94146a0901bc1c4f80
36b68de5b2 Remove getBlockDepth method from Chain::interface (Antoine Riard)
b66c429c56 Remove locked_chain from GetDepthInMainChain and its callers (Antoine Riard)
0ff03871ad Use CWallet::m_last_block_processed_height in GetDepthInMainChain (Antoine Riard)
f77b1de16f Only return early from BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain if current tip is exact match (Antoine Riard)
769ff05e48 Refactor some importprunedfunds checks with guard clause (Antoine Riard)
5971d3848e Add block_height field in struct Confirmation (Antoine Riard)
9700fcb47f Replace CWalletTx::SetConf by Confirmation initialization list (Antoine Riard)
5aacc3eff1 Add m_last_block_processed_height field in CWallet (Antoine Riard)
10b4729e33 Pass block height in Chain::BlockConnected/Chain::BlockDisconnected (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
Work starter to remove Chain::Lock interface by adding m_last_block_processed_height in CWallet and m_block_height in CMerkleTx to avoid GetDepthInMainChain having to keep a lock . Once this one done, it should ease work to wipe out more cs_main locks from wallet code.
I think it's ready for a first round of review before to get further.
- `BlockUntilSyncedToCurrent` : restrain isPotentialTip to isTip because we want to be sure that wallet see BlockDisconnected callbacks if its height differs from the Chain one. It means during a reorg, an RPC could return before the BlockDisconnected callback had been triggered. This could cause a tx that had been included in the disconnected block to be displayed as confirmed, for example.
~~- `AbandonTransaction` : in case of conflicted tx (nIndex = -1), we set its m_block_height to the one of conflicting blocks, but if this height is superior to CWallet::m_last_block_processed_height, that means tx isn't conflicted anymore so we return 0 as tx is again unconfirmed~~ After #16624, we instead rely on Confirmation.
~~- `AddToWalletIfInvolvingMe`: in case of block disconnected, transactions are added to mempool again, so we need to replace old txn in `mapWallet` with a height set to zero so we remove check on block_hash.IsNull~~ Already done in #16624
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
@jkczyz you've ACKed an intermediate commit (github annoyingly orders commits in date order, not commit order). Did you mean to ACK the final commit in this branch (36b68de5b2).
jkczyz:
> @jkczyz you've ACKed an intermediate commit (github annoyingly orders commits in date order, not commit order). Did you mean to ACK the final commit in this branch ([36b68de](36b68de5b2)).
meshcollider:
utACK 36b68de5b2
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 36b68de5b2. Changes since last review: new jkczyz refactor importprunedfunds commit, changed BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChainChanges commit title and description, changed Confirmation struct field order and line-wrapped comment
jnewbery:
utACK 36b68de5b2
promag:
Code review ACK 36b68de5b2.
Tree-SHA512: 08b89a0bcc39f67c82a6cb6aee195e6a11697770c788ba737b90986b4893f44e90d1ab9ef87239ea3766508b7e24ea882b7199df41173ab27a3d000328c14644
CheckInputs() used to check no double spends, scripts & sigs and amounts. Since
832e0744cb, the double spend and amount checks
have been moved to CheckTxInputs(), and CheckInputs() now just validates
input scripts. Rename the function to CheckInputScripts().
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i -E -e 's/CheckInputs\b/CheckInputScripts/g' $(git grep -l CheckInputs | grep -v doc/)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
5506ecfe7a [refactor] Replace global int nScriptCheckThreads with bool (John Newbery)
d9957623b4 [tests] Don't use TestingSetup in the checkqueue_tests (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
The meaning of this value is confusing. Refactor it and add comments.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 5506ecfe7a
promag:
ACK 5506ecfe7a, only change was addressing my nits.
laanwj:
Code review ACK 5506ecfe7a
MarcoFalke:
ACK 5506ecfe7a🥐
Tree-SHA512: 78536727c98d2c23f3c0f3f169131474fef9a4486ae65029011caf06eab30f6f70ff73a65b2fb04a5d969fc1150858d1c6ea4767f04d48c1eea6b829316d0e63
The global nScriptCheckThreads int is confusing and is only needed for
its int-ness in AppInitMain. Move all `-par` parsing logic there and
replace the int nScriptCheckThreads with a bool
g_parallel_script_checks.
Also tidy up logic and improve comments.
dcef9a2922 logs: add timing information to FlushStateToDisk() (James O'Beirne)
41edaf227a logs: add BCLog::Timer and related macros (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
It's currently annoying to detect FlushStateToDisk() calls when benchmarking since they have to be inferred from a drop in coins count from the `UpdateTip: ` log messages. This adds a new logging utility, `BCLog::Timer`, and some related macros that are generally useful for printing timing-related logging messages, and a message that is unconditionally written when the coins cache is flushed to disk.
```
2019-09-04T20:17:51Z FlushStateToDisk: write block and undo data to disk completed (3ms)
2019-09-04T20:17:51Z FlushStateToDisk: write block index to disk completed (370ms)
2019-09-04T20:17:51Z FlushStateToDisk: write coins cache to disk (2068451 coins, 294967kB) completed (21481ms)
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Thanks, ACK dcef9a2922
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK dcef9a2922. No changes since last review other than moving code to new timer.h header
Tree-SHA512: 6d61e48a062d3edb48d0e056a6f0b1f8031773cc99289ee4544f8349d24526b88519e1e304009d56e428f1eaf76c857bf8e7e1c0b6873a6f270306accb5edc3d
To do so we update CValidationInterface::BlockDisconnect to take a
CBlockIndex pointing to the block being disconnected.
This new parameter will be use in the following commit to establish
wallet height.
Instead of keeping pindexBestHeader set to the best header we've
ever seen, reset it back to our validated tip if we find an ancestor
of it turns out to be invalid. While the name is now a bit confusing,
this matches much better with how it is used in practice, see below.
Further, this opens up more use-cases for it in the future, namely
aggressively searching for new peers in case we have discovered
(possibly via some covert channel) headers which we do not know to be
invalid, but which we cannot find block data for.
Places pindexBestHeader is used:
* Various GUI displays of the best header and getblockchaininfo["headers"],
I don't think changing this is bad, and if anything this is less confusing
in the presence of an invalid block.
* IsCurrentForFeeEstimation(): If anything I think ensuring pindexBestHeader
isn't some crazy invalid chain is better than the alternative, even in the
case where you are rejecting the current chain due to hardware error (since
hopefully in that case you won't get any new blocks anyway).
* ConnectBlock assumevalid checks: We use pindexBestHeader to check that the
block we're connecting leads to something with nMinimumChainWork (preventing
a user-set assumevalid from having bogus work) and that the block we're
connecting leads to pindexBestHeader (I'm not too worried about this one -
it's nice to "disable" assumevalid if we have a long invalid headers chain,
but I don't see it as a critical protection).
* BlockRequestAllowed() uses pindexBestHeader as its target to ensure the
requested block is within a month of the "current chain". I don't think this
is a meaningful difference, if we're rejecting the current tip we're
trivially fingerprintable anyway, and if the chain really does have a bunch
of invalid crap near the tip, using the best not-invalid header is likely a
better criteria.
* ProcessGetBlockData uses pindexBestHeader as the "current chain" definition
of whether a block request is "historical" for the purpose of bandwidth
limiting. Similarly, I don't see why this is a meaningful change.
* We use pindexBestHeader for requesting missing headers on receipt of a
headers/compact block message or block inv as well as for initial getheaders.
I think this is definitely wrong, using the best not-invalid header for such
requests is much better.
* We use pindexBestHeader to define the "current chain" for deciding when
we're close to done with initial headers sync. I don't think this is a
meaningful change.
* We use pindexBestHeader to decide if initial headers sync has timed out. If
we're rejecting the chain due to hardware error this may result in
additional cases where we ban a peer, but this is already true, so I think
its fine.
ValidationState::Invalid() takes a parameter `ret` which is returned to
the caller. All call sites set this to false. Remove the `ret` parameter
and just return false always.
This is in preparation for the next commit, which removes the useless
`ret` parameter from ValidationState::Invalid().
error() is simply a convenience wrapper that calls LogPrintf and returns
false. Call LogPrintf explicitly and substitute the error() call for a
false bool literal.
0a433fc876 [validation] Remove unused cacheSigStore from CheckInputsFromMempoolAndCache (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
CheckInputsFromMempoolAndCache() is only called in one place, and
cacheSigStore is set to true in that call site. Remove the argument
entirely.
Also improve commenting.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
unsigned ACK 0a433fc876 Comment looks good
jamesob:
ACK 0a433fc876
laanwj:
ACK 0a433fc876
fanquake:
ACK 0a433fc876. Checked that `CheckInputsFromMempoolAndCache` is only called once, in `MemPoolAccept::ConsensusScriptChecks`, and that `cacheSigStore` is true.
Tree-SHA512: e4b4d2550e35df55c8f8fa4c539174cc2d3728112ddb937cb2ff759d8630a01566b5ec42a70a82e33994e6586f5a457a75a59f64b15d27c65331c723cbb097af
CheckInputsFromMempoolAndCache() is only called in one place, and
cacheSigStore is set to true in that call site. Remove the argument
entirely.
Also improve commenting.
9075d13153 [docs] Add release notes for removal of REJECT reasons (John Newbery)
04a2f326ec [validation] Fix REJECT message comments (John Newbery)
e9d5a59e34 [validation] Remove REJECT code from CValidationState (John Newbery)
0053e16714 [logging] Don't log REJECT code when transaction is rejected (John Newbery)
a1a07cfe99 [validation] Fix peer punishment for bad blocks (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
We no longer send BIP 61 REJECT messages, so there's no need to set
a REJECT code in the CValidationState object.
Note that there is a minor bug fix in p2p behaviour here. Because the
call to `MaybePunishNode()` in `PeerLogicValidation::BlockChecked()` only
previously happened if the REJECT code was > 0 and < `REJECT_INTERNAL`,
then there are cases were `MaybePunishNode()` can get called where it
wasn't previously:
- when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `CACHED_INVALID`.
- when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `BLOCK_MISSING_PREV`.
Note that `BlockChecked()` cannot fail with an 'internal' reject code. The
only internal reject code was `REJECT_HIGHFEE`, which was only set in
ATMP.
This reverts a minor bug introduced in 5d08c9c579.
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
ACK 9075d13, changes since last reviewed are splitting them in separate commits to ease understanding and fix nits
fjahr:
ACK 9075d13153, confirmed diff to last review was fixing nits in docs/comments.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9075d13153. Only changes since last review are splitting the main commit and updating comments
Tree-SHA512: 58e8a1a4d4e6f156da5d29fb6ad6a62fc9c594bbfc6432b3252e962d0e9e10149bf3035185dc5320c46c09f3e49662bc2973ec759679c0f3412232087cb8a3a7
faec689bed txmempool: Make entry time type-safe (std::chrono) (MarcoFalke)
faaa1f01da util: Add count_seconds time helper (MarcoFalke)
1111170f2f test: mempool entry time is persisted (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This changes the type of the entry time of txs into the mempool from `int64_t` to `std::chrono::seconds`.
The benefits:
* Documents the type for developers
* Type violations result in compile errors
* After compilation, the two are equivalent (at no run time cost)
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
utACK faec689bed
laanwj:
ACK faec689bed
Tree-SHA512: d958e058755d1a1d54cef536a8b30a11cc502b7df0d6ecf84a0ab1d38bc8105a67668a99cd5087a444f6de2421238111c5fca133cdf8e2e2273cb12cb6957845
2a4e60b482 Fix block index inconsistency in InvalidateBlock() (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Previously, we could release `cs_main` while leaving the block index in a state
that would fail `CheckBlockIndex()`, because `setBlockIndexCandidates` was not being
fully populated before releasing `cs_main`.
ACKs for top commit:
TheBlueMatt:
utACK 2a4e60b482. I also discovered another issue in InvalidateBlock while reviewing, see #16856.
Sjors:
ACK 2a4e60b. Tested on top of #16899. Also tested `invalidateblock` with `-checkblockindex=1`.
fjahr:
ACK 2a4e60b. Ran tests, reviewed code, inspected behavior while manually testing `invalidateblock`.
Tree-SHA512: ced12f9dfff0d413258c709921543fb154789898165590b30d1ee0cdc72863382f189744f7669a7c924d3689a1cc623efdf4e5ae3efc60054572c1e6826de612
fdb3e8f8b2 Ignore old versionbit activations (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
PR 16060 removed the CSV and Segwit BIP9 softfork definitions and hard-coded ('buried') the activation heights. The versionbits code will warn users if an undefined softfork has been signalled in block header versions, and removing the CSV/Segwit definitions caused those warnings to be triggered.
Change the BIP 9 warning code to only check for unknown softforks after the segwit activation height.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK fdb3e8f8b2
ajtowns:
ACK fdb3e8f8b2 for what it's worth
achow101:
ACK fdb3e8f8b2
Sjors:
ACK fdb3e8f8b2. It makes the bit 0 warning go away in mainnet and testnet QT when a new block arrives. I think the code is clear enough.
jonatack:
ACK fdb3e8f8b2
Tree-SHA512: e6fd34e8902f8c7affb28e8951803e47d542710d5f1229000746656a37ee59d754439fc33e36b7eef87544262e5aac374645db91b74cb507e73514003ca7a67f
3cf36736e5 refactoring: move ReplayBlocks under CChainState (James O'Beirne)
bcf73d3b84 refactoring: move LoadChainTip to CChainState method (James O'Beirne)
f5809d5b13 doc: fix CChainState::ActivateBestChain doc (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11):
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/master/proposal
---
Move more chainstate-related functionality to methods on CChainState. Nothing too interesting here, but needed to work with multiple chainstates. And brief to review. :)
Also fixes doc on ActivateBestChain.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 3cf36736e5
ryanofsky:
Can confirm. utACK 3cf36736e5. Removes wrapper functions and removes more ::ChainActive() and ::ChainstateActive() calls than it adds, so seems good.
Tree-SHA512: 4bf8a1dd454ca9d61c85f6736910fa7354c57acc0002e3a8e5ce494035d8280e4c20e066f03478eeff7d44195e7912c282a486526da9be53854b478b961affaa
c4b0c08f7c Update tx-size-small comment with relevant CVE disclosure (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
Code first introduced under https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11423 with essentially no description and no discussion.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK c4b0c08f7c
fanquake:
ACK c4b0c08f7c
Tree-SHA512: 95d5c92998b8b1e944c477dbaee265b62612b6e815099ab31d9ff580b4dff777abaf7f326a284644709f918aa1510412d62310689b1250ef6e64de7b19ca9f71
4a87c5cfdf [refactor] Rewrite AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker() using smaller parts (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
This is in preparation for re-using these validation components for a new version of AcceptToMemoryPool() that can operate on multiple transactions ("package relay").
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 4a87c5cfdf (did the rebase myself and arrived at the same result, mod whitespace)
laanwj:
ACK 4a87c5cfdf
Tree-SHA512: b0495c026ffe06146258bace3d5e0c9aaf23fa65f89f258abc4af5980812e68e63a799f1d923e78ac1ee6bcafaf1222b2c2690a527df9b65dff7b48a013f154e
0c62e3aa73 New regression testing for CVE-2018-17144, CVE-2012-2459, and CVE-2010-5137. (lucash-dev)
38bfca6bb2 Added comments referencing multiple CVEs in tests and production code. (lucash-dev)
Pull request description:
This functional test includes two scenarios that test for regressions of vulnerabilities, but they are only briefly described. There are freely available documents explaining in detail the issues, but without explicit mentions, the developer trying to maintain the code needs an additional step of digging in commit history and PR conversations to figure it out.
Added comments to explicitly mention CVE-2018-17144 and CVE-2012-2459, for more complete documentation.
This improves developer experience by making understanding the tests easier.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 0c62e3aa73, checked the CVE numbers, thanks for adding documentation
Tree-SHA512: 3ee05351745193b8b959e4a25d50f25a693b2d24b0732ed53cf7d5882df40b5dd0f1877bd5c69cffb921d4a7acf9deb3cc1160b96dc730d9b5984151ad06b7c9
This is in preparation for re-using these validation components for a new
version of AcceptToMemoryPool() that can operate on multiple transactions
("package relay").
fa912a8ad5 doc: move-only ActivateBestChain doxygen comment to header (MarcoFalke)
fa99efd054 doc: ActivateBestChainStep return value (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It will always return true, unless a system error such as #15305 occurred
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa912a8ad5
Tree-SHA512: d439da844a467f9705014b946d7d987fb62cb63fe6a325b2fdbbb73a6578fc0ade3f60892044f02face43948204fc4e3c9fa70d108233d4ca8eef27984059689
Previously, we could release cs_main while leaving the block index in a state
that would fail CheckBlockIndex, because setBlockIndexCandidates was not being
fully populated before releasing cs_main.
5ce822efbe Conservatively accept RBF bumps bumping one tx at the package limits (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
Based on #15681, this adds support for some simple cases of RBF inside of large packages. Issue pointed out by sdaftuar in #15681, and this fix (or a broader one) is required ot make #15681 fully useful.
Accept RBF bumps of single transactions (ie which evict exactly one
transaction) even when that transaction is a member of a package
which is currently at the package limit iff the new transaction
does not add any additional mempool dependencies from the original.
This could be made a bit looser in the future and still be safe,
but for now this fixes the case that a transaction which was
accepted by the carve-out rule will not be directly RBF'able
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
re-ACK 5ce822efbe
ajtowns:
ACK 5ce822efbe ; GetSizeWithDescendants is only change and makes sense
sipa:
Code review ACK 5ce822efbe. I haven't thought hard about the effect on potential DoS issues this policy change may have.
Tree-SHA512: 1cee3bc57393940a30206679eb60c3ec8cb4f4825d27d40d1f062c86bd22542dd5944fa5567601c74c8d9fd425333ed3e686195170925cfc68777e861844bd55
