The test for gettxoutsetinfo in rpc_blockchain.py verifies that the
result is the same as before after invalidating and reconsidering a
block. The comparison has to exclude the 'disk_size' field, though, as
it is not deterministic.
Instead of comparing all the other fields for equality, this change
explicitly removes the 'disk_size' field and then compares the full
objects. This makes the intent more explicit (compare everything except
for disk_size, not compare just a given list of fields) and also the
code simpler.
f98b54352 Only call NotifyBlockTip when the active chain changes (James O'Beirne)
152b7fb25 [tests] Add a (failing) test for waitforblockheight (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is a subset of the more controversial https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12407, but this also adds a test demonstrating the bug.
In InvalidateBlock, we're calling NotifyBlockTip with the now-invalid block's prev regardless of what chain the ancestor block is on. This could create numerous issues, but it at least screws up `waitforblockheight` (or anything else relying on `rpc/blockchain.cpp:latestblock`) when InvalidateBlock is called on a block not in chainActive, which can happen via RPC.
Only call NotifyBlockTip when the block being marked invalid is on the active chain.
Tree-SHA512: 9a54fe5e8c7eb489daf5df4483c0986129e871e2ca931a456ba869ecb5d5a8d4f7bd27ccc9e711e9292c9ed79ddef896c85d0e81fc76883503e327995b0e914f
