915e34112b qt: fix issue when disabling the auto-enabled blank wallet checkbox (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
As detailed by #151, On `master` a user can create the confusing scenario where you have a disabled `Encrypt Wallet` checkbox and a selected `Disable Private Keys` checkbox after unselecting the auto-enabled `Blank Wallet` checkbox.
This commit makes it so that when the `Blank Wallet` checkbox is auto-selected after the user selects `Disable Private keys`, unselecting it will also unselect the `Disable Private Keys` checkbox, which in turn re-enables the `Encrypt Wallet` checkbox.
Below are screenshots comparing the behavior of selecting `Disable Private Keys` then unselecting the `Blank Wallet` between `master` and this `PR`:
**Master:**
| Select `Disable Private Keys` | Unselect `Blank Wallet` |
| ----------------------------- | ------------------------ |
|  |  |
**PR:**
| Select `Disable Private Keys` | Unselect `Blank Wallet` |
| ----------------------------- | ------------------------ |
|  |  |
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 915e34112b
Talkless:
ACK 915e34112b
Tree-SHA512: ce6ecbc35b94a08cabf0b8a24dbdfc874d82cc8918cc8623dce8172c7fc9c75d63a13b036bae5f7ab2c090f8d020574a542285d1651600813faf5d91e2506a8d
4f2653a890 test: Use deterministic chain in utxo set hash test (Fabian Jahr)
4973c5175c test: Remove wallet dependency of utxo set hash test (Fabian Jahr)
1a27af1d7b rpc: Improve gettxoutsetinfo help (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Follow-ups to #19145:
- Small improvement on the help text of RPC gettxoutsetinfo
- Using deterministic blockchain in the test `functional/feature_utxo_set_hash.py`
- Removing wallet dependency in the test `functional/feature_utxo_set_hash.py`
Split out of #19521.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 4f2653a890👲
Tree-SHA512: 92927b3aa22b6324eb4fc9d346755313dec44d973aa69a0ebf80a8569b5f3a7cf3539721ebdba183737534b9e29b3e33f412515890f0d0b819878032a3bba8f9
fa818ca202 fuzz: [refactor] Use PickValue where possible (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`PickValue` is a bit less typing, so I think it should be used where possible
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa818ca202: patch looks correct and `PickValue` is better :)
Tree-SHA512: 49ed030694e3b7676654f1615f033287d26e2f0bc29647e1db56e0d84e14d29080f3e1898f5df8d644d834b8ded3ce713d2425ea86a37c9279d01f86ad03c202
246774e264 depends: fix Qt precompiled headers bug (Igor Cota)
8e7ad4146d depends: disable Qt Vulkan support on Android (Igor Cota)
ba46adaa1a CI: add Android APK build to cirrus (Igor Cota)
7563720e30 CI: add Android APK build script (Igor Cota)
ebfb10cb75 Qt: add Android packaging support (Igor Cota)
Pull request description:
This PR is the third and final piece of the basic Android support puzzle - it depends on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16110 and is related to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16883. It introduces an `android` directory under `qt` and a simple way to build an Android package of `bitcoin-qt`:
1. Build depends for Android as described in the [README](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/depends/README.md)
2. Configure with one of the resulting prefixes
3. Run `make && make apk` in `src/qt`
The resulting APK files will be in `android/build/outputs/apk`. You can install them manually or with [adb](https://developer.android.com/studio/command-line/adb). One can also open the `android` directory in Android Studio for that integrated development and debugging experience. `BitcoinQtActivity` is your starting point.
Under the hood makefile `apk` target:
1. Renames the `bitcoin-qt` binary to `libbitcoin-qt.so` and copies it over to a folder under `android/libs` depending on which prefix and corresponding [ABI](https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/abis.html#sa) `bitcoin-qt` was built for
2. Takes `libc++_shared.so` from the Android NDK and puts in the same place. It [must be included](https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/cpp-support) in the APK
3. Extracts Qt for Android Java support files from the `qtbase` archive in `depends/sources` to `android/src`
There is also just a tiny bit of `ifdef`'d code to make the Qt Widgets menus usable. It's not pretty but it works and is a stepping stone towards https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16883.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 246774e264
laanwj:
Code review ACK 246774e264
Tree-SHA512: ba30a746576a167545223c35a51ae60bb0838818779fc152c210f5af1413961b2a6ab6af520ff92cbc8dcd5dcb663e81ca960f021218430c1f76397ed4cead6c
804ac10631 remove unnecessary newline from initWarning() argument (Larry Ruane)
Pull request description:
Run: `src/bitcoind -wallet=nosuchfile`
Without this patch, `debug.log` contains:
```
2021-03-23T21:19:16Z init message: Verifying wallet(s)...
2021-03-23T21:19:16Z Warning: Skipping -wallet path that doesn't exist. Failed to load database path '/home/larry/.bitcoin/wallets/nosuchfile'. Path does not exist.
2021-03-23T21:19:16Z init message: Loading banlist...
```
With this patch, the empty line isn't present. This PR fixes a similar problem with `src/bitcoind -conf=nosuchfile`
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 804ac10631: patch looks correct!
jarolrod:
tACK 804ac10631, nice catch!
theStack:
Code-review ACK 804ac10631
Tree-SHA512: dfcbaaa72ca24ac40233ac56840cfba8827853711d3df6e229ce940686f2ebf8bf0560bafcaa73a4d82d179a5050af0d3cabdc47b3b1dfd6aaadf718a6635f11
This commit makes it so that when the `Blank Wallet` checkbox is auto-selected after the user selects 'Disable Private' keys, unselecting it will also unselect the 'Disable Private Keys' checkbox, which in turn re-enables the 'Encrypt Wallet' checkbox.
fac921f23f fuzz: Fix tx_pool target to properly fuzz immature outpoints (MarcoFalke)
fa2b95f861 fuzz: Style fixups (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Also includes a commit for minor style fixups
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
utACK fac921f23f this fixes it 👍
Tree-SHA512: 1575ba115b2009b653921511c163bd846cd381d6fc92b04a899c0686d23a02bdcdd95c81776b515b80ae187bcec3ccaca3aa88fcecbec888f73ca2d875eef506
d09ebc4723 Fix wrong(1024) divisor for 1000-based prefixes (wodry)
Pull request description:
v.0.21.0
I saw in the GUI peer window in the "received" column `1007 KB`, and after increasing to >=1024 I guess, it switched to `1 MB`. I would have expected the display unit to change from KB to MB already at value >=1000.
I looked into the code, and the values appear to be power-of-2 byte values, so the switching at >=1024 and not >=1000 seems correct.
But the unit display is not precisely correct, binary prefixes should be used for power-of-2 byte values.
To be correct, this PR changes ~~KB/MB/GB to KiB/MiB/GiB.~~ KB to kB and the divisor from 1024 to 1000.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK d09ebc4723, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (Qt 5.12.8) the both "Network Traffic" and "Peers" tabs of the "Node Window".
jarolrod:
ACK d09ebc4723
leonardojobim:
Tested ACK d09ebc4723 on Ubuntu 20.04 Qt 5.12.8
Tree-SHA512: 8f830b08cc3fd36dc8a18f1192959fe55d1644938044bf31d770f7c3bf8475fba6da5019a2d2024d5b2c81a8dab112f360c555367814a14f4d05c89d130f25b0
1404c57403 [doc] Coin: explain that IsSpent() can also mean never existed (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
This can be especially confusing where `AccessCoin()` is used with logic like this:
```c++
while (iter.n < MAX_OUTPUTS_PER_BLOCK) {
const Coin& alternate = view.AccessCoin(iter);
if (!alternate.IsSpent()) return alternate;
```
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 1404c57403
MarcoFalke:
ACK 1404c57403
jnewbery:
utACK 1404c57403
Tree-SHA512: 418618dd7e08bd5cc8360e3501d0f57e34100e5101ad3b8e0a819923fa860f44c7f2fada0f8447a1af3c2601fd72bfe619b91ff2f26f7133ceaeb0c98b017b12
55554463c1 fuzz: Use ConsumeWeakEnum in addrman for service flags (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This has minimally better performance. Reported by me in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20228#discussion_r598081787
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
Tested ACK 55554463c1
vasild:
ACK 55554463c1
Tree-SHA512: 4e5f51fe4f2bd7b2f37d0690e41203341ba45c0c9bc9247449cd26cfb5f77dc2ec61df3e4963276f68694e4b3ca3d0a76367a51c4d775501edeb3224d305a261
fa4cebadcf util: Make Assume() usable as unary expression (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Assume shouldn't behave different at the call site depending on build flags. Currently compilation fails if it is used as expression. Fix that by using the lambda approach from `Assert()` without the `assert()`.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK fa4cebadcf
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa4cebadcf: patch looks correct and commit hash starts with `fa`
Tree-SHA512: 9ec9ac8d410cdaf5e4e28df571a89e3d23d38e05a7027bb726cae3da6e9314734277e5a218e9e090cc17e10db763da71052c229ad642077ca5824ee42022f3ed
5294f0d5a9 refactor: return std::nullopt instead of {} (fanquake)
Pull request description:
In #21415 [we decided](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21415#issuecomment-800236640) to return `std::optional` rather than `{}` for
uninitialized values. This PR replaces the two remaining usages of `{}`
with `std::nullopt`.
As a side-effect, this also quells the spurious GCC 10.2.x warning that
we've had reported quite a few times. i.e #21318, #21248, #20797.
```bash
txmempool.cpp: In member function ‘CTxMemPool::setEntries CTxMemPool::GetIterSet(const std::set<uint256>&) const’:
txmempool.cpp:898:13: warning: ‘<anonymous>’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
898 | return {};
| ^
```
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 5294f0d5a9, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 5b776be79ab26e5a3a5fc2b463b394ea5ce6797ed5558424873fa4ecee2898170eff76d6da9d69394d28f8f98974117fc63b922a3e19c52f5294c83073e79bb0
In #21415 we decided to return `std::optional` rather than `{}` for
uninitialized values. This PR repalces the two remaining usages of `{}`
with `std::nullopt`.
As a side-effect, this also quells the spurious GCC 10.2.x warning that
we've had reported quite a few times. i.e #21318, #21248, #20797.
```bash
txmempool.cpp: In member function ‘CTxMemPool::setEntries CTxMemPool::GetIterSet(const std::set<uint256>&) const’:
txmempool.cpp:898:13: warning: ‘<anonymous>’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
898 | return {};
| ^
```
Introduce an android directory under qt and allow one to package bitcoin-qt for Android by running make apk.
Add bitcoin-qt Android build instructions.
3d086f42ab test: add ParseUInt16() test coverage (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
`ParseUInt16()` was just added in #21328.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 3d086f42ab: patch looks correct & more coverage is better than less coverage
Tree-SHA512: bf7f96deb7c1531419565907f0ea8a8e32b368d4b823a3e80928b2c118edbf643ea06e357b4b5504a89f855caeed289daa9f823c740231ed6ad1b8ed00285ce8
52a43b0c7d build: Fix fuzz-cuckoocache cross-compiling for Windows with DEBUG=1 (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Fix#21348.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
Tested ACK 52a43b0c7d
Tree-SHA512: 6592f829edfb740a1e9d0691acf04b2372e91b0a53ca395b08350cb0b80031d3b55fa7331bdaddf857d450eb30b605af9fe8fe02559cda19374a48f9634fae70
787df19b09 validation: don't try to invalidate genesis block (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
In the block invalidation method (`CChainState::InvalidateBlock`), the code for creating the candidate block map assumes that the passed block's previous block (`pindex->pprev`) is available and otherwise segfaults due to null-pointer deference in `CBlockIndexWorkComparator()` (see analysis by practicalswift in #20914), i.e. it doesn't work with the genesis block. Rather than analyzing all possible code paths and implications for this corner case, simply fail early if the genesis block is passed.
Fixes#20914.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 787df19b09. Tested invalidation of generic on regtest.
practicalswift:
Tested ACK 787df19b09
Tree-SHA512: 978be7cf2bd1c1faebfe945d191ac77dea72791bea826459abd308f77c74c5991efee495a38817c306e488ecd5208b5c888df7d9d044132dd9a06bbbdb256b6c
8dd5946c0b add functional test (Larry Ruane)
b5a80fa7e4 util: Handle HTTP_SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE in bitcoin-cli (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
If `bitcoind` is processing 16 RPC requests, attempting to submit another request using `bitcoin-cli` produces this less-than-helpful error message: `error: couldn't parse reply from server`. This PR changes the error to: `error: server response: Work queue depth exceeded`.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tACK 8dd5946c0b
luke-jr:
utACK 8dd5946c0b (no changes since previous utACK)
hebasto:
re-ACK 8dd5946c0b, only suggested changes since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18335#pullrequestreview-460621350) review.
darosior:
ACK 8dd5946c0b
Tree-SHA512: 33e25f6ff05d9b56fae2bdb68b132557bb8e995f5438ac4fbbc53c304c5152a98aa43c43600c31d8a6a2830cbd48bf8ec7d89dce50190b29ec00a43830126913
52dd40a9fe test: add missing netaddress include headers (Jon Atack)
6f09c0f6b5 util: add missing braces and apply clang format to SplitHostPort() (Jon Atack)
2875a764f7 util: add ParseUInt16(), use it in SplitHostPort() (Jon Atack)
6423c8175f p2p, refactor: pass and use uint16_t CService::port as uint16_t (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
As noticed during review today in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20685#discussion_r584873708 of the upcoming I2P network support, `CService::port` is `uint16_t` but is passed around the codebase and into the ctors as `int`, which causes uneeded conversions and casts. We can avoid these (including in the incoming I2P code without further changes to it) by using ports with the correct type. The remaining conversions are pushed out to the user input boundaries where they can be range-checked and raise with user feedback in the next patch.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 52dd40a9fe: patch looks correct
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 52dd40a9fe
vasild:
ACK 52dd40a9fe
Tree-SHA512: 203c1cab3189a206c55ecada77b9548b810281cdc533252b8e3330ae0606b467731c75f730ce9deb07cbaab66facf97e1ffd2051084ff9077cba6750366b0432
fa81773243 style-only: Remove whitespace (MarcoFalke)
fae77b9e6d net: Simplify ProcessGetBlockData execution by removing send flag. (Patrick Strateman)
fae7c0429f log: Clarify that block request below NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED_MIN_BLOCKS disconnects (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
* Clarify that "ignoring" really means "disconnect" in the log
* Revive a refactor I took from #13670
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK fa81773243
sipa:
utACK fa81773243
Tree-SHA512: 0a4fcb979cb82c4e26012881eeaf903c38dfbb85d461476c01e35294760744746a79c48ffad827fe31c1b830f40c6e4240529c71e375146e4d0313c3b7d784ca
fa2a80bf12 refactor: Pass PeerManagerImpl members only once (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Member variables are already passed to methods via `this`, so no need to pass them another time as function parameter.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK fa2a80bf12
amitiuttarwar:
utACK fa2a80bf12
Tree-SHA512: 1743825c7560cc748235e3db03e4cea02ad1f670f1b898d7757da644f12693ba9bb2d3eb09b64b3d10dd2e68f52dea31e26d5e97bdc013759baa0515d3c7055c
680eb56d82 [net processing] Don't pass CConnman to RelayTransactions (John Newbery)
a38a4e8f03 [net processing] Move RelayTransaction into PeerManager (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This is the first part of #21160. It moves the RelayTransaction() function to be a member function of the PeerManager class. This is required in order to move the transaction inventory data into the Peer object, since Peer objects are only accessible from within PeerManager.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 680eb56d82
Tree-SHA512: 8c93491a4392b6369bb7f090de326a63cd62a088de59026e202f226f64ded50a0cf1a95ed703328860f02a9d2f64d3a87ca1bca9a6075b978bd111d384766235
ebc4ab721b refactor: post Optional<> removal cleanups (fanquake)
57e980d13c scripted-diff: remove Optional & nullopt (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Same rationale & motivation as #21404, which turned out to be quite low in the number of potential conflicts. Lets see what the bot has to say here.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK ebc4ab721b: patch looks correct
jnewbery:
utACK ebc4ab721b
laanwj:
Code review ACK ebc4ab721b
Tree-SHA512: 550fbeef09b9d35ddefaa805d1755c18c8fd499c4b0f77ebfece8c20296a7abd1cf6c699e2261f92fe3552deeb7555ec2a2287ffe3ab9e98bb9f8612a4d43be3
57ff5a42ab doc: specify minimum HWI version (Sjors Provoost)
03308b2bfa rpc: don't require wallet for enumeratesigners (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
HWI just released 2.0. See https://github.com/bitcoin-core/HWI/releases/tag/2.0.0
As of #16546 we already rely on features that are in 2.0 and not in the previous 1.* releases:
* `--chain` param
This shouldn't be a problem, because HWI 2.0 has been released before we release v22.
Misc improvements:
* document that HWI 2.0 is required
* drop wallet requirement for `enumeratesigners`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code Review ACK 57ff5a42ab
Tree-SHA512: 3fb6ba20894e52a116f89525a5f5a1f61d363ccd904e1cffd0e6d095640fc6d2edf0388cd6ae20f83bbc31e5f458255ec090b6e823798d426eba3e45b4336bf9
f9cd2bfbcc Rename CoinSelectionParams::effective_fee to m_effective_feerate (Andrew Chow)
bdd0c2934b wallet: Move discard feerate fetching to CreateTransaction (Andrew Chow)
448d04b931 wallet: Move long term feerate setting to CreateTransaction (Andrew Chow)
e2f429e6bb wallet: Replace nFeeRateNeeded with effective_fee (Andrew Chow)
1a6a0b0dfb wallet: Use existing feerate instead of getting a new one (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
During coin selection, there are various places where we need to have a feerate. We need the feerate for the transaction itself, the discard fee rate, and long term feerate. Fetching these each time we need them can lead to a race condition where two feerates that should be the same are actually different. One particular instance where this can happen is during the loop in `CreateTransactionInternal`. After inputs are chosen, the expected transaction fee is calculated using a newly fetched feerate. If `pick_new_inputs == false`, the loop will go again with the assumption that the fee for the transaction remains the same. However because the feerate is fetched again, it is possible that it actually isn't and this causes coin selection to fail.
Instead of fetching the feerate each time it is needed, we fetch them all at once at the top of `CreateTransactionInternal`, store them in `CoinSelectionParams`, and use them where needed.
While some of these fee rates probably don't need this caching, I've done it for consistency and the guarantee that they remain the same.
Fixes#19229
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK f9cd2bfbcc
fjahr:
Code review re-ACK f9cd2bfbcc
Xekyo:
tACK f9cd2bfbcc
meshcollider:
Code review + test run ACK f9cd2bfbcc
Tree-SHA512: be83ff64ba473c3cdd3469c812e214659b6e2a9584c22ed2b1595618fce0d4b35d0901e61068cd1069fc1a8fb911db01dd7312d05c3b8cbafbe2504ab7a3e863
Instead of fetching the discard feerate for each SelectCoinsMinConf
iteration, fetch and cache it once during CreateTransaction so that it
is shared for each SelectCoinsMinConf through
coin_selection_params.m_discard_feerate.
Does not change behavior.
Instead of setting the long term feerate for each SelectCoinsMinConf
iteration, set it once during CreateTransaction and let it be shared
with each SelectCoinsMinConf through
coin_selection_params.m_long_term_feerate.
Does not change behavior.
