84ca5b349e doc: mention sanitizer suppressions in developer docs (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Should be enough to close#17834.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 84ca5b349e
Tree-SHA512: 233c688a3cef1006c9a00f7b7a52fd6ee0ec150367e5e56904b6f1bbdca21b9217c69f8fcf653a4943613d12c3178a39f761b25eb24fc1954a563cfb1f832f5e
fab17f08e2 Revert "[contrib] verify-commits: Add MarcoFalke fingerprint" (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This reverts commit fa24329334.
The commit may be signed by my key, but I haven't checked it. Also, I haven't checked the new `contrib/verify-commits/trusted-git-root`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fab17f08e2
glozow:
ACK fab17f08e2
Tree-SHA512: 485fb302f7e42704412afffd6c09a031f63df18f259b27282b8373d5bf95b0ec72426cec476d88bf23e793a6e1dae4c1df2059645961806e34b50448ebf1862a
64c105442c util: make GetDataDir read-only & create datadir.. (willcl-ark)
56e370fbb9 util: add ArgsManager datadir helper functions (willcl-ark)
Pull request description:
Fixes#20070
Currently `ArgsManager::GetDataDir()` ensures it will always return a datadir by creating one if necessary. The function is shared between `bitcoind` `bitcoin-qt` and `bitcoin-cli` which results in the undesirable behaviour described in #20070.
This PR splits out the part of the function which creates directories and adds it as a standalone function, only called as part of `bitcoind` and `bitcoin-qt` init, but not `bitcoin-cli`.
`ReadConfigFiles`' behavior is changed to use the absolute path of the config file in error and warning messages instead of a relative path.
This was inadvertantly the form being tested [here](73966f75f6/test/functional/feature_config_args.py (L287)), whilst we were _not_ testing that a relative path was returned by the message even though we passed a relative path in as argument.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 64c105442c
hebasto:
re-ACK 64c105442c, only comments have been adjusted as requsted since my previous [review](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27073#pullrequestreview-1307435890).
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 64c105442c
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 64c105442c. Only comment changes since last review
Tree-SHA512: b129501346071ad62551c9714492b21536d0558a94117d97218e255ef4e948d00df899a4bc2788faea27d3b1f20fc6136ef9d03e6a08498d926d9ad8688d6c96
f36d1d5b89 Use void* throughout support/lockedpool.h (Jeffrey Czyz)
Pull request description:
Replace uses of char* with void* in Arena's member variables. Instead,
cast to char* where needed in the implementation.
Certain compiler environments disallow std::hash<char*> specializations
to prevent hashing the pointer's value instead of the string contents.
Thus, compilation fails when std::unordered_map is keyed by char*.
Explicitly using void* is a workaround in such environments. For
consistency, void* is used throughout all member variables similarly to
the public interface.
Changes to this code are covered by src/test/allocator_tests.cpp.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK f36d1d5b89
theStack:
Code-review ACK f36d1d5b89
jonatack:
ACK f36d1d5b89 review, debug build, unit tests, checked clang 15 raises "error: arithmetic on a pointer to void" without the conversions here from the generic void* pointer back to char*
Tree-SHA512: f9074e6d29ef78c795a512a6e00e9b591e2ff34165d09b73eae9eef25098c59e543c194346fcd4e83185a39c430d43744b6f7f9d1728a132843c67bd27ea5189
7013da07fb Add release note for PR#25943 (David Gumberg)
04f270b435 Add test for unspendable transactions and parameter 'maxburnamount' to sendrawtransaction. (David Gumberg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a user configurable, zero by default parameter — `maxburnamount` — to `sendrawtransaction`. This PR makes bitcoin core reject transactions that contain unspendable outputs which exceed `maxburnamount`. closes#25899.
As a result of this PR, `sendrawtransaction` will by default block 3 kinds of transactions:
1. Those that begin with `OP_RETURN` - (datacarriers)
2. Those whose lengths exceed the script limit.
3. Those that contain invalid opcodes.
The user is able to configure a `maxburnamount` that will override this check and allow a user to send a potentially unspendable output into the mempool.
I see two legitimate use cases for this override:
1. Users that deliberately use `OP_RETURN` for datacarrier transactions that embed data into the blockchain.
2. Users that refuse to update, or are unable to update their bitcoin core client would be able to make use of new opcodes that their client doesn't know about.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK 7013da07fb
achow101:
re-ACK 7013da07fb
Tree-SHA512: f786a796fb71a587d30313c96717fdf47e1106ab4ee0c16d713695e6c31ed6f6732dff6cbc91ca9841d66232166eb058f96028028e75c1507324426309ee4525
When producing a dummy signature for the purpose of estimating the transaction fee, do not assume an external signer performs R-value grinding on the signature.
In particular, this avoids a scenario where the fee rate is 1 sat / vbyte and a transaction with a 72 byte signature is not accepted into our mempool.
This commit also drops the nullptr default for CCoinControl arguments for functions that it touches. This is because having a boolean argument right next to an optional pointer is error prone.
Co-Authored-By: S3RK <1466284+S3RK@users.noreply.github.com>
2f84ad7b9e docs: add ramdisk guide for running tests on OSX (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
Using a ramdisk on OSX sped up the test suite by about 5x (using default `jobs=4`) on my M1 macbook pro running macOS Monterey 12.3.1. This PR adds the relevant OSX commands following the Linux directions.
Default:
```
8204 s (accumulated)
Runtime: 2104 s
```
following commands from the PR:
```
1606 s (accumulated)
Runtime: 421 s
```
ramdisk + `jobs=32`:
```
2090 s (accumulated)
Runtime: 85 s
```
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 2f84ad7b9e
willcl-ark:
ACK 2f84ad7b9e
brunoerg:
utACK 2f84ad7b9e
Tree-SHA512: 37a9903c8ac2cbfaa91e7e73fc96ef65042ff4b15763d452af7b8615255adf03429ad01cf85265a99dd569290c1d69c05a393d616868c05c190b60b053820786
.. only in bitcoind and bitcoin-qt
This changes behaviour of GetConfigFilePath which now always returns the
absolute path of the provided -conf argument.
Symbol visibility issues are not actually fixed yet because we have not yet
defined an api and exported symbols, but everything is now in place for that.
Building binaries against our uninstalled shared libs is impractical. Instead,
to test them, we'll need to work on a runtime shared-lib execution harness.
0af16e7134 doc: add release note for #25574 (Martin Zumsande)
57ef2a4812 validation: report if pruning prevents completion of verification (Martin Zumsande)
0c7785bb25 init, validation: Improve handling if VerifyDB() fails due to insufficient dbcache (Martin Zumsande)
d6f781f1cf validation: return VerifyDBResult::INTERRUPTED if verification was interrupted (Martin Zumsande)
6360b5302d validation: Change return value of VerifyDB to enum type (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
`VerifyDB()` can fail to complete due to insufficient dbcache at the level 3 checks. This PR improves the error handling in this case in the following ways:
- The rpc `-verifychain` now returns false if the check can't be completed due to insufficient cache
- During init, we only log a warning if the default values for `-checkblocks` and `-checklevel` are taken and the check doesn't complete. However, if the user actively specifies one of these args, we return with an InitError if we can't complete the check.
This PR also changes `-verifychain` RPC to return `false` if the verification didn't finish due to missing block data (pruning) or due to being interrupted by the node being shutdown.
Previously, this PR also included a fix for a possible assert during verification - this was done in #27009 (now merged).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 0af16e7134
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 0af16e7134. Only small suggested changes since the last review, like renaming some of the enum values. I did leave more suggestions, but they are not very important and could be followups
john-moffett:
ACK 0af16e7134
MarcoFalke:
lgtm re-ACK 0af16e7134 🎚
Tree-SHA512: 84b4f767cf9bfbafef362312757c9bf765b41ae3977f4ece840e40c52a2266b1457832df0cdf70440be0aac2168d9b58fc817238630b0b6812f3836ca950bc0e
c3b4b5a142 test: Replace 0xC0 constant (roconnor-blockstream)
Pull request description:
Instead it should be the named constant `LEAF_VERSION_TAPSCRIPT`.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK c3b4b5a142
theStack:
ACK c3b4b5a142
Tree-SHA512: c00be584ea2d0e7c01bf5620da0da1f37e5b5298ef95df48d91d137c8c542f5d91be158d45392cf2ba8874bf27bd12924e2eed395773b49d091e3028de3356a2
4bbf5ddd44 Detailed error message for passphrases with null chars (John Moffett)
b4bdabc223 doc: Release notes for 27068 (John Moffett)
4b1205ba37 Test case for passphrases with null characters (John Moffett)
00a0861181 Pass all characters to SecureString including nulls (John Moffett)
Pull request description:
`SecureString` is a `std::string` specialization with a secure allocator. However, in practice it's treated like a C- string (no explicit length and null-terminated). This can cause unexpected and potentially insecure behavior. For instance, if a user enters a passphrase with embedded null characters (which is possible through Qt and the JSON-RPC), it will ignore any characters after the first null, potentially giving the user a false sense of security.
Instead of assigning to `SecureString` via `std::string::c_str()`, assign it via a `std::string_view` of the original. This explicitly captures the size and still doesn't make any extraneous copies in memory.
Note to reviewers, the following all compile identically in recent `GCC` (x86-64 and ARM64) with `-O2` (and `-std=c++17`):
```C++
std::string orig_string;
std::cin >> orig_string;
SecureString s;
s.reserve(100);
// The following all compile identically
s = orig_string;
s = std::string_view{orig_string};
s.assign(std::string_view{orig_string});
s.assign(orig_string.data(), orig_string.size());
```
So it's largely a matter of preference. However, one thing to keep in mind is that we want to avoid making unnecessary copies of any sensitive data in memory.
Something like `SecureString s{orig_string};` is still invalid and probably unwanted in our case, since it'd get treated as a short string and optimized away from the secure allocator. I presume that's the reason for the `reserve()` calls.
Fixes#27067.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 4bbf5ddd44
stickies-v:
re-ACK [4bbf5dd](4bbf5ddd44)
furszy:
utACK 4bbf5ddd
Tree-SHA512: 47a96905a82ca674b18076a20a388123beedf70e9de73e42574ea68afbb434734e56021835dd9b148cdbf61709926b487cc95e9021d9bc534a7c93b3e143d2f7
49d01f32c9 kernel: add missing include (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
This syncs the cs_main definition/declaration.
Noticed when experimenting with the external visibility of `cs_main`.
Specifically, this is needed for the following to work as intended:
```c++
__attribute__ ((visibility ("default"))) extern RecursiveMutex cs_main;
```
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 49d01f32c9
Tree-SHA512: ea0dbcf81959566f949d76c7dcd1e33de53e613519500c863bfb0ac8209665b1c12cff2daa7890d03b76debc4d046339ee7b3231adb71b128e9d5a8fa3132b6c
3c1de032de i2p: use consistent number of tunnels with i2pd and Java I2P (Vasil Dimov)
801b405f85 i2p: lower the number of tunnels for transient sessions (Vasil Dimov)
b906b64eb7 i2p: reuse created I2P sessions if not used (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
* Reuse an I2P transient session instead of discarding it if we failed to connect to the desired peer. This means we never used the generated address (destination), whose creation is not cheap. This does not mean that we will use the same address for more than one peer.
* Lower the number of tunnels for transient sessions.
* Explicitly specify the number of tunnels for persistent sessions instead of relying on the defaults which differ between I2P routers. This way we get consistent behavior with all routers.
Alleviates: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26754
(I have not tested this with i2pd, yet)
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 3c1de032de
mzumsande:
Light ACK 3c1de032de
Tree-SHA512: 477b4b9a5755e6a9a46bc0f7b268fa419dff4414e25445c750ae913f7552d9e2313f2aca4e3b70067b8390c2d0c2d68ec459f331765e939fc84139e454031cd4
4d84eaec82 Raise PRNG seed log to INFO. (roconnor-blockstream)
Pull request description:
Some build infrastructure, such as Nix, will delete failed builds by default, keeping only the log (stdout/stderr) of the failed build.
For flaky tests, it would be very helpful to have the PRNG seed in the default log in order to redo the failed test.
By simply raising the PRNG seed logging to INFO, we can, by default, record the seed in the log of every build.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 4d84eaec82
theStack:
ACK 4d84eaec82
Tree-SHA512: 3ccb4a4e7639a3babc3b2a6456a6d0bffc090da34e4545b317f7bfbed4e9950d1b38ea5b2a90c37ccb49b3454bdeff03a6aaf86770b9c4dd14b26320aba50b94
9486509be6 wallet, rpc: Update migratewallet help text for encrypted wallets (Andrew Chow)
aaf02b5721 tests: Tests for migrating wallets by name, and providing passphrase (Andrew Chow)
7fd125b27d wallet: Be able to unlock the wallet for migration (Andrew Chow)
6bdbc5ff59 rpc: Allow users to specify wallet name for migratewallet (Andrew Chow)
dbfa345403 wallet: Allow MigrateLegacyToDescriptor to take a wallet name (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`migratewallet` currently operates on wallets that are already loaded, however this is not necessarily required, and in the future, not possible once the legacy wallet is removed. So we need to also be able to give the wallet name to migrate.
Additionally, the passphrase is required when migrating a wallet. Since a wallet may not be loaded when we migrate, and as we currently unload wallets when migrating, we need the passphrase to be given to `migratewallet` in order to migrate encrypted wallets.
Fixes#27048
ACKs for top commit:
john-moffett:
reACK 9486509be6
pinheadmz:
ACK 9486509be6
furszy:
ACK 9486509b
Tree-SHA512: 35e2ba69a148e129a41e20d7fb99c4cab7947b1b7e7c362f4fd06ff8ac6e79e476e07207e063ba5b80e1a33e2343f4b4f1d72d7930ce80c34571c130d2f5cff4
Moves chainstate initialization into its own function. This is
necessary to later support a more readable way of handling
background-validation chainstate cleanup during init, since the
chainstate initialization functions may need to be repeated after
moving leveldb filesystem content around.
This commit isn't strictly necessary, but the alternative is to (ab)use
the `while` loop in init.cpp with a `continue` on the basis of a
specific ChainstateLoadingError return value from LoadChainstate. Not
only is this harder to read, but it can't be unittested.
The approach here lets us consolidate background-validation cleanup to
LoadChainstate, and therefore exercise it within tests.
This commit is most easily reviewed with
git diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra
--color-moved-ws=ignore-space-change
and remove m_snapshot_validated. This state can now be inferred by the
number of isUsable chainstates.
m_disabled is used to signal that a chainstate should no longer be used
by validation logic; it is used as a sentinel when background validation
completes or if the snapshot chainstate is found to be invalid.
isUsable is a convenience method that incorporates m_disabled.
c1b7bd047f fuzz: avoid redundant dup key checks when creating Miniscript nodes (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
I thought i had done that already in #24149, but it must have slipped through the rebase. It's a 2x speed improvement against the existing corpora and will probably be much more as we extend them with larger nodes.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK c1b7bd047f
Tree-SHA512: 9e6ceb6254183964b6c5538e21ba6321df95a68acb343a15a6ecfef5c51a1980d2627df5aeef9aef1db41656e18cc4f3bc96e6f24314d12fa60368b04a350001
61bb4e783b lint: enable E722 do not use bare except (Leonardo Lazzaro)
Pull request description:
Improve test code and enable E722 lint check.
If you want to catch all exceptions that signal program errors, use except Exception: (bare except is equivalent to except BaseException:).
Reference: https://peps.python.org/pep-0008/#programming-recommendations
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 61bb4e783b
Tree-SHA512: c7497769d5745fa02c78a20f4a0e555d8d3996d64af6faf1ce28e22ac1d8be415b98e967294679007b7bda2a9fd04031a9d140b24201e00257ceadeb5c5d7665
Since users may have thought the null characters in their
passphrases were actually evaluated prior to this change,
they may be surprised to learn that their passphrases no
longer work. Give them feedback to explain how to remedy
the issue.
`SecureString` is a `std::string` specialization with
a secure allocator. However, it's treated like a C-
string (no explicit length and null-terminated). This
can cause unexpected behavior. For instance, if a user
enters a passphrase with an embedded null character
(which is possible through Qt and the JSON-RPC), it will
ignore any characters after the null, giving the user
a false sense of security.
Instead of assigning `SecureString` via `std::string::c_str()`,
assign it via a `std::string_view` of the original. This
explicitly captures the size and doesn't make any extraneous
copies in memory.
6a5b348f2e test: test rescanning encrypted wallets (ishaanam)
493b813e17 wallet: ensure that the passphrase is not deleted from memory when being used to rescan (ishaanam)
66a86ebabb wallet: keep track of when the passphrase is needed when rescanning (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
Wallet passphrases are needed to top up the keypool of encrypted wallets
during a rescan. The following RPCs need the passphrase when rescanning:
- `importdescriptors`
- `rescanblockchain`
The following RPCs use the information about whether or not the
passphrase is being used to ensure that full rescans are able to
take place (meaning the following RPCs should not be able to run
if a rescan requiring the wallet to be unlocked is taking place):
- `walletlock`
- `encryptwallet`
- `walletpassphrasechange`
`m_relock_mutex` is also introduced so that the passphrase is not
deleted from memory when the timeout provided in
`walletpassphrase` is up and the wallet is still rescanning.
Fixes#25702, #11249
Thanks to achow101 for coming up with the idea of using a new mutex to solve this issue and for answering related questions.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 6a5b348f2e
hernanmarino:
ACK 6a5b348f2e
furszy:
Tested ACK 6a5b348f
Tree-SHA512: 0b6db692714f6f94594fa47249f5ee24f85713bfa70ac295a7e84b9ca6c07dda65df7b47781a2dc73e5b603a8725343a2f864428ae20d3e126c5b4802abc4ab5
95f12de925 BIP341 txdata cannot be precomputed without spent outputs (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
In `PrecomputedTransactionData::Init`, if `force` is set to `true`, `m_bip341_taproot_ready` is always set to true, suggesting that all its BIP341-relevant members (including `m_spent_amounts_single_hash`) are correct. If however no `spent` array of spent previous `CTxOut`s is provided, some of these members will be incorrect. This option was introduced in #21365.
That doesn't actually hurt, as without prevout data, it's fundamentally impossible to generate correct BIP341 signatures anyway, and f722a9bd13/src/script/sign.cpp (L71) should prevent the logic from being used anyway.
Still, don't set `m_bip341_taproot_ready` variable when we clearly don't have enough data to compute it.
Discovered by Russell O'Connor.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 95f12de925
achow101:
ACK 95f12de925
instagibbs:
ACK 95f12de925
Tree-SHA512: 90acd2bfa50a7a0bde75a15a9f6c1f5c40f48fb5b870b1bbc4082777e24a482c8282463ef7d1245e53201dbcb5c196ef0386352f8e380e68cdf00c2111633b77
Some build infrastructure, such as Nix, will delete failed builds by default, keeping only the log of the failed build.
For flaky tests, it would be very helpful to have the PRNG seed in the default log in order to redo the failed test.
By simply raising the PRNG seed logging to INFO, we can, by default, record the seed in the log of every build.
14b4921a91 wallet: reuse change dest when recreating TX with avoidpartialspends (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27051
When the wallet creates a transaction internally, it will also create an alternative that spends using destination groups and see if the fee difference is negligible. If it costs the user the same to send the grouped version, we send it (even if the user has `avoidpartialspends` set to `false` which is default). This patch ensures that the second transaction creation attempt re-uses the change destination selected by the first attempt. Otherwise, the first change address remains reserved, will not be used in the second attempt, and then will never be used by the wallet, leaving gaps in the BIP44 chain.
If the user had `avoidpartialspends` set to true, there is no second version of the created transaction and the change addresses are not affected.
I believe this behavior was introduced in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14582
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 14b4921a91
Tree-SHA512: a3d56f251ff4b333fc11325f30d05513e34ab0a2eb703fadd0ad98d167ae074493df1a24068298336c6ed2da6b31aa2befa490bc790bbc260ed357c8f2397659
