62b125fd19 qt, refactor: Fix indentation (Prateek Sancheti)
ad28b66e98 qt: Add SubFeeFromAmount option (Prateek Sancheti)
Pull request description:
This PR adds **_SubFeeFromAmount_** option which lets the user select their preferred setting of whether fee for a transaction is to be subtracted from the amount or not for future transactions. The setting chosen by the user is remembered even when the GUI mode is turned off.
**_Functionality and Usage:_**
- Go to `Settings > Options > Wallet` on _Windows/Linux_ or `bitcoin-qt > Preferences > Wallet` on _macOS_.
- The checkbox **Subtract Fee From Amount** corresponds to the added option **SubFeeFromAmount**.
- The preferred setting intended to be the default for all future send transactions should be selected by the user.
- Click on **OK**.
- Go to the **Send** tab in the wallet.
- You shall notice, any new Send transaction created will have the preferred setting as chosen by the user.<br> (Try clicking on Add recipient or even restarting the Node in GUI)
Attaching ScreenRecordings to explain the added feature.
> Master.mov: Master Branch
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/54016434/127763378-be91837d-d0ab-4ae5-87c0-d303fa70a336.mov
> PR.mov: PullRequest
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/54016434/127763404-05b834c1-4082-4fbd-9b05-1528ac898a21.movClose#386
ACKs for top commit:
Talkless:
tACK 62b125fd19, tested on Debian Sid with 5.15.2 and it works as described.
hebasto:
re-ACK 62b125fd19, only removed the unused `SubFeeFromAmountChanged` signal since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/390#pullrequestreview-726531766) review.
meshcollider:
utACK 62b125fd19
Tree-SHA512: 932ca89ae578a1e1c426561400d87cf005c231944feaf0f662ff8d88f32bdd65a927a090ea41510a15f8ec0ebcd5529672e9917720eb5ea85f413f081e45d5bb
Previously, building from a release source tarball would result in a
version string like v22.0.0-<commithash>, but we expect just v22.0.0.
This commit solves this problem.
Also use PACKAGE_VERSION instead of reconstructing it.
0237d95323 qt: Add Load PSBT functionaliy with nowallet (Prateek Sancheti)
Pull request description:
This PR provides a fix to the issue mentioned in #232.
Currently, the **_Load PSBT_** functionality works well in case a wallet is loaded but does nothing when a wallet isn't loaded.
If a function cannot work without a wallet being loaded, it is disabled by default (It is unclickable as shown in the image).
For e.g. One cannot `Close Wallet` or `Backup Wallet` or `Sign Messages` without a wallet being loaded. And hence they are disabled. But if you notice, `Load PSBT` options are not disabled by default even when a wallet isn't loaded.
> 
As mentioned by hebasto in the issue description :
```
<hebasto> achow101: does "File" -> "Load PSBT from {file|clipboard}" make any sense when no wallet is loaded?
<achow101> hebasto: yes, for finalize and sending
```
This means **_Load PSBT_** should be working just as similar whether wallets are being loaded or not.
After making the required changes to the code, The **_Load PSBT_** works as expected even with no wallet loaded and the PSBT is finalized.
| Master | PR |
|-------------|---------------|
|  |  |
Close#232
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 0237d95323
hebasto:
ACK 0237d95323, tested on Linux Mint 20.2 (Qt 5.12.8).
Tree-SHA512: 8d928c5bfd3c2b286ddcacd0b367c872de8bc3d3d9d82280faeadc60d738b86af328c060b5763ade364c9b386b23f95580c2eb1147b16373fbb713170c100350
6971e790c3 gui: add Direction column to peers tab (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Picking up #289
This adds a `Direction column`, making the peers tab the same as the `Direction/Type` row in the peer details and the direction and type columns in our other user-facing peer connections table in `-netinfo`.
Users can now sort the peers table by direction. The default sort is set to inbound, then outbound.
| Master | PR |
| ----------- | ----------- |
|  |  |
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Tested ACK 6971e790c3
ShaMan239:
tACK 6971e790c3
hebasto:
ACK 6971e790c3, tested on Linux Mint 20.2 (Qt 5.12.8).
Tree-SHA512: 9716cdedd435f88245a097fed6d4b2b486104d0dd09df739bdb4f2bfad709cbd9c9a231168cc3326e94fa5fddc77dd68f992f20417d04d94930db9fccdbb7de1
4830f4912a qt: Refactor open date range to use std::optional (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Use `std::nullopt` for open date range instead of `TransactionFilterProxy::MIN_DATE` and `TransactionFilterProxy::MAX_DATE`.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 4830f4912a, only missed header included since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/354#pullrequestreview-682108182) review.
Talkless:
tACK 4830f4912a, tested on Debian Sid, filtering seems to work as expected.
Tree-SHA512: dcecbcc129cb401d6ac13a20f015b8cb2a7434fae6bd3e5b19fca5531e8bd915e2a0835f9c601371381750cdc8cd6fcf4f8c6669177d679773046cbe13bed68b
bb56486a17 refactor: Reuse MakeUnorderedList where possible (Hennadii Stepanov)
77a90f03ac refactor: Move MakeUnorderedList into util/string.h to make it reusable (Hennadii Stepanov)
6a5ccd65c7 scripted-diff: Rename JoinErrors in more general MakeUnorderedList (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
A nice `JoinErrors` utility function was introduced in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/379 by Russell Yanofsky.
This PR renames this function and re-uses it across the code base.
ACKs for top commit:
Zero-1729:
Concept ACK bb56486a17
theStack:
Code-review ACK bb56486a17
Talkless:
utACK bb56486a17
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK bb56486a17. Nice deduping, thanks for this!
Tree-SHA512: 6bdbfa61f2ffa69e075f46b733f247c6d5b8486779a1dac064285a199a4bb8bc5ef44eaee37086305646b5c88eb6a11990883219a4a9140a5117ee21ed529bb9
fafe896a0b test: Set regtest.BIP66Height = 102 to speed up tests (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
No need to waste time by forcing creation of more than 1000 blocks to get the benefits of being able to test BIP 66. Also, reducing the height makes it more likely that (third-party) tests are conforming to BIP 66, which is enforced on mainnet for all new blocks.
ACKs for top commit:
GeneFerneau:
Concept + code review ACK [fafe896](fafe896a0b)
0xB10C:
crACK fafe896a0b
laanwj:
ACK fafe896a0b
Zero-1729:
tACK fafe896
kristapsk:
ACK fafe896a0b. Full functional test suite showed few second speed incrase on my laptop (although I didn't do proper benchmarking with multiple runs, just single `time ./test/functional/test_runner.py` on current master vs this PR).
theStack:
Tested ACK fafe896a0b
hg333:
tACK fafe896a0b
Tree-SHA512: 4bbee3c8587d612e74a59fde49b6439c1296f2fc27d3a7cf59a35e920f729fdd581c930290bd04def618f81412236676ddb99b4ceb4d80dfb9fd610b128a04b1
b851a92c06 cli: Add progress bar for -getinfo (klementtan)
Pull request description:
Add a progress bar for the `Verification progress` attribute in `-getinfo` when verification progress `< 99%`.
**Motivation**:
* Improve user-friendliness of `-getinfo`
* Can be useful with `watch -n 1 bitcoin-cli -getinfo`(suggested by theStack [below](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22547#issuecomment-887488172))
* The progress bar is only display when are still syncing to tip(verification progress `< 99%`)
**Reviewing**
If your verification progress is `> 99%` you can restart the verification progress with
```shell
$ ./src/bitcoind -reindex
$./src/bitcoin-cli -getinfo
```
ACKs for top commit:
prayank23:
reACK b851a92c06
theStack:
re-ACK b851a92c06🍹
Zero-1729:
re-tACK b851a92c06 (re-tested, works as expected 🍾)
jonatack:
ACK b851a92c06
lsilva01:
Tested ACK b851a92c06 on mainnet and signet on Ubuntu 20.04.
Tree-SHA512: 2046d812e3c4623c6cc3ed4c24f2daaa92ba12cd181fa21626b782743890c2373be3175cff1441a7ba37295b6d5818368deea90d483959875c22f7ad9b601a20
90b3e482e9 release: Release with separate SHA256SUMS and sig files (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
This allows us to:
- remove the rfc4880 EOL hacks, and
- release with a SHA256SUMS.asc file that's a combination of all signer signatures
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 90b3e482e9
laanwj:
Concept and code review ACK 90b3e482e9
Tree-SHA512: 5d5086063d303aa0cbd590e5fdf2ae8f555e25f4e43bf67545e33384449b990e94834c711622530ad0eb3dcc83f52746884a5081dadb0acff8dd799cfadafac7
d451b60d22 guix-verify: Non-zero exit code when anything fails (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
```
Previously, if verification fails, the correct message will be printed,
but the exit code would still be 0.
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d451b60d22
Tree-SHA512: 695d72121f308d8a66db780eca16878fb378b4d766de5b58c2d6f778c5661a2f7bdf37a96e8e8e283b0a46b5d55f24bca05fa7509aa1822f0854c50064200572
accf3d5868 [test] mempool package ancestor/descendant limits (glozow)
2b6b26e57c [test] parameterizable fee for make_chain and create_child_with_parents (glozow)
313c09f7b7 [test] helper function to increase transaction weight (glozow)
f8253d69d6 extract/rename helper functions from rpc_packages.py (glozow)
3cd663a5d3 [policy] ancestor/descendant limits for packages (glozow)
c6e016aa13 [mempool] check ancestor/descendant limits for packages (glozow)
f551841d3e [refactor] pass size/count instead of entry to CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits (glozow)
97dd1c729d MOVEONLY: add helper function for calculating ancestors and checking limits (glozow)
f95bbf58aa misc package validation doc improvements (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR implements a function to calculate mempool ancestors for a package and enforces ancestor/descendant limits on them as a whole. It reuses a portion of `CalculateMemPoolAncestors()`; there's also a small refactor to move the reused code into a generic helper function. Instead of calculating ancestors and descendants on every single transaction in the package and their ancestors, we use a "worst case" heuristic, treating every transaction in the package as each other's ancestor and descendant. This may overestimate everyone's counts, but is still pretty accurate in the our main package use cases, in which at least one of the transactions in the package is directly related to all the others (e.g. 1 parent + 1 child, multiple parents with 1 child, or chains).
Note on Terminology: While "package" is often used to describe groups of related transactions _within_ the mempool, here, I only use package to mean the group of not-in-mempool transactions we are currently validating.
#### Motivation
It would be a potential DoS vector to allow submission of packages to mempool without a proper guard for mempool ancestors/descendants. In general, the purpose of mempool ancestor/descendant limits is to limit the computational complexity of dealing with families during removals and additions. We want to be able to validate multiple transactions on top of the mempool, but also avoid these scenarios:
- We underestimate the ancestors/descendants during package validation and end up with extremely complex families in our mempool (potentially a DoS vector).
- We expend an unreasonable amount of resources calculating everyone's ancestors and descendants during package validation.
ACKs for top commit:
JeremyRubin:
utACK accf3d5
ariard:
ACK accf3d5.
Tree-SHA512: 0d18ce4b77398fe872e0b7c2cc66d3aac2135e561b64029584339e1f4de2a6a16ebab3dd5784f376e119cbafc4d50168b28d3bd95d0b3d01158714ade2e3624d
92993aa5cf Change SignTransaction's input_errors to use bilingual_str (Andrew Chow)
171366e89b Use bilingual_str for address fetching functions (Andrew Chow)
9571c69b51 Add bilingual_str::clear() (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
In a couple of places in the wallet, errors are `std::string`. In order for these errors to be translated, change them to use `bilingual_str`.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 92993aa5cf, only rebased since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22337#pullrequestreview-694542729) review, verified with
klementtan:
Code review ACK 92993aa5cf
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 92993aa5cf
Tree-SHA512: 5400e419dd87db8c49b67ed0964de2d44b58010a566ca246f2f0760ed9ef6a9b6f6df7a6adcb211b315b74c727bfe8c7d07eb5690b5922fa5828ceef4c83461f
fa6fd3dd6a wallet: Properly set fInMempool in mempool notifications (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
A wallet method (like bumping the fee) might have set `fInMempool` to false because the transaction was removed from the mempool (See commit fa4e088cba).
Avoid setting it back to true (incorrectly) in the validation interface background thread.
Fixes#22357
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa6fd3dd6a. Only change since last review is extending workaround to `transactionRemovedFromMempool`. Since we know this workaround is imperfect and the goal of this PR is mainly to fix CI errors, I would probably be inclined to limit the workaround to as few places as possible where we have seen actual failures, instead of adding the workaround to as many places as possible, where there is some chance it might trigger new failures. But since this workaround is so straightforward and almost looks like a real fix, probably it doesn't matter.
meshcollider:
utACK fa6fd3dd6a
Tree-SHA512: d690136a577f1f532aa1fee80d3f6600ff7fc61286fbf564a53d7938d5ae52d33f0dbb0fef8b8c041a4970fb424f0b9f1ee7ce791e0ff8354e0000ecc9e22b84
bb822a7af8 wallet, rpc: add listdescriptors private option (S3RK)
Pull request description:
Rationale: make it possible to backup your wallet with `listdescriptors` command
* The default behaviour is still to show public version
* For private version only the root xprv is returned
Example use-case:
```
> bitcoin-cli -regtest -named createwallet wallet_name=old descriptors=true
> bitcoin-cli -regtest -rpcwallet=old listdescriptors true | jq '.descriptors' > descriptors.txt
> bitcoin-cli -regtest -named createwallet wallet_name=new descriptors=true blank=true
> bitcoin-cli -regtest -rpcwallet=new importdescriptors "$(cat descriptors.txt)"
```
In case of watch-only wallet without private keys there will be following output:
```
error code: -4
error message:
Can't get descriptor string.
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK bb822a7af8
Rspigler:
tACK bb822a7af8
jonatack:
ACK bb822a7af8 per `git diff 2854ddc bb822a7`
prayank23:
tACK bb822a7af8
meshcollider:
Code review ACK bb822a7af8
Tree-SHA512: f6dddc72a74e5667071ccd77f8dce578382e8e29e7ed6a0834ac2e114a6d3918b59c2f194f4079b3259e13d9ba3b4f405619940c3ecb7a1a0344615aed47c43d
fabed982ad fuzz: Re-enable assert in banman again (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Looks like this was accidentally fixed by removing the buggy code in commit efd6f904c7
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fabed982ad
Tree-SHA512: 2dea5dad48ff2050ae7086c1c6306c40f650e9629918e79adc54164a375d777a70b29f5a480566dc6430f07ce33dfe703fc5d45a20125584b4a026c5832198a2
a9b9ca82da gui: ensure external signer option remains disabled without signers (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When no external signers are available, the option to enable external signers should always be disabled. However the encrypt wallet checkbox can erroneously re-enable the external signer checkbox. To avoid this, CreateWalletDialog now stores whether signers were available during setSigners so that future calls to external_signer_checkbox->setEnabled can account for whether signers are available.
Fixes#395
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK a9b9ca82da, tested on Linux Mint 20.2 (Qt 5.12.8).
Sjors:
tACK a9b9ca82da
jarolrod:
ACK a9b9ca82da
Tree-SHA512: 98951bcadc23fce99a66ea2d367c44360989e888c253845a767e1f7085c594562d0f099de4130f4a078c5072aa7806294097d976ee6407291f3d3c5a4a608b44
When no external signers are available, the option to enable external
signers should always be disabled. However the encrypt wallet checkbox
can erroneously re-enable the external signer checkbox. To avoid this,
CreateWalletDialog now stores whether signers were available during
setSigners so that future calls to external_signer_checkbox->setEnabled
can account for whether signers are available.
addrman_tests fail when consistency checks are enabled, since the tests
set the deterministic test addrman's nKey value to zero, which is an
invalid value. Change this so that deterministic addrman's nKey value is
set to 1.
This requires updating a few tests that are using magic values derived
from nKey being set to 0.
87651795d8 fuzz: check that ser+unser produces the same AddrMan (Vasil Dimov)
6408b24517 fuzz: move init code to the CAddrManDeterministic constructor (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Add a fuzz test that fills addrman with a pile of randomly generated addresses, serializes it to a stream, unserializes the stream to another addrman object and compares the two.
Some discussion of this already happened at https://github.com/jnewbery/bitcoin/pull/18.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 87651795d8
jonatack:
ACK 87651795d8 rebased to current master, reviewed, fuzz build, ran `FUZZ=addrman_serdeser src/test/fuzz/fuzz`
Tree-SHA512: 7eda79279f14f2649840bf752e575d7b02cbaad541f74f7254855ebd4a32da988f042d78aa9228983350283bb74dd0c71f51f04c0846889c3ba2f19f01a0c303
When calculating ancestor/descendant counts for transactions in the
package, as a heuristic, count every transaction in the package as an
ancestor and descendant of every other transaction in the package.
This may overestimate, but will not underestimate, the
ancestor/descendant counts. This shortcut still produces an accurate
count for packages of 1 parent + 1 child.
This does not change existing behavior.
The ancestor/descendant limits are inclusive of the entries themselves,
but CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits() does not need access to them.
5a1bef60a0 test: refactor: remove binascii from test_framework (Zero-1729)
Pull request description:
This PR continues the work started in PR #22593, regarding using the `bytes` built-in module. In this PR specifically, instances of `binascii`'s methods `hexlify`, `unhexlify`, and `a2b_hex` have been replaced with the build-in `bytes` module's `hex` and `fromhex` methods where appropriate to make bytes <-> hex-string conversions consistent across the functional test files and test_framework.
Additionally, certain changes made are based on the following assumption:
```
bytes.hex(data) == binascii.hexlify(data).decode()
bytes.hex(data).encode() == binascii.hexlify(data)
```
Ran the functional tests to ensure behaviour is still consistent and changes didn't break existing tests.
closes#22605
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK 5a1bef60a0🔢
Tree-SHA512: 8f28076cf0580a0d02a156f3e1e94c9badd3d41c3fbdfb2b87cd8a761dde2c94faa5f4c448d6747b1ccc9111c3ef1a1d7b42a11c806b241fa0410b7529e2445f
faa670d386 test: Properly set BIP34 height in CreateNewBlock_validity unit test (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The coinbase scriptSig in this unit test has several issues:
* The BIP34 height is not the "first item" as required (See https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0034.mediawiki#specification)
* It uses the wrong encoding ( See da69d9965a/src/validation.cpp (L3250) )
* It uses the wrong height (off by one)
While BIP34 isn't currently enforced in this unit test, this should be fixed to avoid confusion and to promote self-consistency.
The change obviously requires new proof of work (`BLOCKINFO`).
Also change the block version from `1` to `VERSIONBITS_TOP_BITS`, because this test shouldn't care about the block version and bumping it is required for other changes.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code review ACK faa670d386
Tree-SHA512: 8dbe2d5300a640f3e1817ff048906e60463aca64ba50fec8ee4f18fb1c70e511008755b0b5baba81114a1a6265fdfae9a4b7ae8acadfb2c7ad43223157a0386c
