2a39ccf133 Add include for std::bind. (sinetek)
Pull request description:
Hi, this patch adds in <functional> because the GUI code makes use of std::bind.
That's all.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK 2a39ccf133
Tree-SHA512: fb5ac07d9cd5d006182b52857b289a9926362a2f1bfa4f7f1c78a088670e2ccf39ca28214781df82e8de3909fa3e69685fe1124a7e3ead758575839f5f2277a9
Also clean up and better comment the function. InactivityChecks() uses a
mixture of (non-mockable) system time and mockable time. Make sure
that's well documented.
Despite being marked as const in CConnman before this commit, the
function did mutate the state of the passed in CNode, which is contained
in vNodes, which is a member of CConnman. To make the function truly
const in CConnman and all its data, instead make InactivityChecks() a
pure function, return whether the peer should be disconnected, and let
the calling function (SocketHandler()) update the CNode object. Also
make the CNode& argument const.
b4dd2ef800 [test] Test the add_outbound_p2p_connection functionality (Amiti Uttarwar)
602e69e427 [test] P2PBlocksOnly - Test block-relay-only connections. (Amiti Uttarwar)
8bb6beacb1 [test/refactor] P2PBlocksOnly - Extract transaction violation test into helper. (Amiti Uttarwar)
99791e7560 [test/refactor] P2PBlocksOnly - simplify transaction creation using blocktool helper. (Amiti Uttarwar)
3997ab9154 [test] Add test framework support to create outbound connections. (Amiti Uttarwar)
5bc04e8837 [rpc/net] Introduce addconnection to test outbounds & blockrelay (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
The existing functional test framework uses the `addnode` RPC to spin up manual connections between bitcoind nodes. This limits our ability to add integration tests for our networking code, which often executes different code paths for different connection types.
**This PR enables creating `outbound` & `block-relay-only` P2P connections in the functional tests.** This allows us to increase our p2p test coverage, since we can now verify expectations around these connection types.
This builds out the [prototype](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/14210#issuecomment-527421978) proposed by ajtowns in #14210. 🙌🏽
An overview of this branch:
- introduces a new test-only RPC function `addconnection` which initiates opening an `outbound` or `block-relay-only` connection. (conceptually similar to `addnode` but for different connection types & restricted to regtest)
- adds `test_framework` support so a mininode can open an `outbound`/`block-relay-only` connection to a `P2PInterface`/`P2PConnection`.
- updates `p2p_blocksonly` tests to create a `block-relay-only` connection & verify expectations around transaction relay.
- introduces `p2p_add_connections` test that checks the behaviors of the newly introduced `add_outbound_p2p_connection` test framework function.
With these changes, there are many more behaviors that we can add integration tests for. The blocksonly updates is just one example.
Huge props to ajtowns for conceiving the approach & providing me feedback as I've built out this branch. Also thank you to jnewbery for lots of thoughtful input along the way.
ACKs for top commit:
troygiorshev:
reACK b4dd2ef800
jnewbery:
utACK b4dd2ef800
MarcoFalke:
Approach ACK b4dd2ef800🍢
Tree-SHA512: d1cba768c19c9c80e6a38b1c340cc86a90701b14772c4a0791c458f9097f6a4574b4a4acc7d13d6790c7b1f1f197e2c3d87996270f177402145f084ef8519a6b
fad1f0fd33 net: Remove unused cs_feeFilter (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
A `RecursiveMutex` is overkill for setting or reading a plain integer. Even a `Mutex` is overkill, when a plain `std::atomic` can be used.
This removes 11 lines of code. Also, it is cutting down on the number of locks put on the stack at the same time, which complicates review looking out for potential lock contention.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK fad1f0fd33
practicalswift:
cr ACK fad1f0fd33: patch looks correct
Tree-SHA512: 647f9b954fbf52e138d3e710937eb9131b390fef0deae03fd6a162d5a18b9f194010800bbddc8f89208d91be2802dff11c3884d04b3dd233865abd12aa3cde06
faecb74562 Expose integral m_conn_type in CNodeStats, remove m_conn_type_string (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Currently, strings are stored for what are actually integral (strong) enum types. This is fine, because the strings are only used as-is for the debug log and RPC. However, it complicates using them in the GUI. User facing strings in the GUI should be translated and only string literals can be picked up for translation, not runtime `std::string`s.
Fix that by removing the `std::string` members and replace them by strong enum integral types.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Code review ACK faecb74562
theStack:
Code review ACK faecb74562🌲
Tree-SHA512: 24df2bd0645432060e393eb44b8abaf20fe296457d07a867b0e735c3e2e75af7b03fc6bfeca734ec33ab816a7c8e1f8591a5ec342f3afe3098a4e41f5c2cfebb
Add a new RPC endpoint to enable opening outbound connections from
the tests. The functional test framework currently uses the addnode RPC, which
has different behavior than general outbound peers. These changes enable
creating both full-relay and block-relay-only connections. The new RPC
endpoint calls through to a newly introduced AddConnection method on
CConnman that ensures we stay within the allocated max.
31b136e580 Don't declare de facto const reference variables as non-const (practicalswift)
1c65c075ee Don't declare de facto const member functions as non-const (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
_Meta: This is the second and final part of the `const` refactoring series (part one: #20581). **I promise: no more refactoring PRs from me in a while! :)** I'll now go back to focusing on fuzzing/hardening!_
Changes in this PR:
* Don't declare de facto const member functions as non-const
* Don't declare de facto const reference variables as non-const
Awards for finding candidates for the above changes go to:
* `clang-tidy`'s [`readability-make-member-function-const`](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/readability-make-member-function-const.html) check ([list of `clang-tidy` checks](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/list.html))
* `cppcheck`'s `constVariable` check ([list of `cppcheck` checks](https://sourceforge.net/p/cppcheck/wiki/ListOfChecks/))
See #18920 for instructions on how to analyse Bitcoin Core using Clang Static Analysis, `clang-tidy` and `cppcheck`.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 31b136e580
jonatack:
ACK 31b136e580
theStack:
ACK 31b136e580❄️
Tree-SHA512: f58f8f00744219426874379e9f3e9331132b9b48e954d24f3a85cbb858fdcc98009ed42ef7e7b4619ae8af9fc240a6d8bfc1c438db2e97b0ecd722a80dcfeffe
378aedc452 [net] Add cs_vSend lock annotations (John Newbery)
673254515a [net] Move RecordBytesSent() call out of cs_vSend lock (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
RecordBytesSent() does not require cs_vSend to be locked, so reduce the scope of cs_vSend.
Also correctly annotate the CNode data members that are guarded by cs_vSend.
This is a simpler alternative to #19673.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ok, reverting to commit 378aedc which has two ACKs already. Any style issues can be fixed up in future PRs.
troygiorshev:
ACK 378aedc452
theStack:
re-ACK 378aedc452
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 378aedc452🔌
Tree-SHA512: e9cd6c472b7e1479120c1bf2d1c640cf6d18c7d589a5f9b7dfc4875e5790adaab403a7a1b945a47e79e7249a614b8583270e4549f89b22e8a9edb2e4818b0d07
86c495223f net: add CNode::IsInboundOnion() public getter and unit tests (Jon Atack)
6609eb8cb5 net: assert CNode::m_inbound_onion is inbound in ctor (Jon Atack)
993d1ecd19 test, fuzz: fix constructing CNode with invalid inbound_onion (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
The goal of this PR is to be able to depend on `m_inbound_onion` in AttemptToEvictConnection in #20197:
- asserts `CNode::m_inbound_onion` is inbound in the CNode ctor to have a validity check at the class boundary
- fixes a unit test and a fuzz utility that were passing invalid inbound onion values to the CNode ctor
- drops an unneeded check in `CNode::ConnectedThroughNetwork()` for its inbound status
- adds a public getter `IsInboundOnion()` that also allows unit testing it
- adds unit test coverage
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 86c495223f
LarryRuane:
ACK 86c495223f
vasild:
ACK 86c495223f
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 86c495223f🐍
Tree-SHA512: 21109105bc4e5e03076fadd489204be00eac710c9de0127708ca2d0a10a048ff81f640f589a7429967ac3eb51d35fe24bb2b12e53e7aa3efbc47aaff6396d204
010eed3ce0 doc: warn that incoming conns are unlikely when not using default ports (Adam Jonas)
Pull request description:
Closes#5150.
This was mostly copied from #5285 by sulks, who has since quit GitHub.
The issue has remained open for 6 years, but the extra explanation still seems useful.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
re-ACK 010eed3ce0
Tree-SHA512: d240fb06bba41ad8898ced59356c10adefc09f3abb33e277f8e2c5980b40678f2d237f286b476451bb29d2b94032a7dee2ada3b2efe004ed1c2509e70b48e40f
ea36a453e3 [net] Make p2p recv buffer timeout 20 minutes for all peers (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
The timeout interval for the send and recv buffers was changed from 90
minutes to 20 minutes in commit f1920e86 in 2013, except for peers that
did not support the pong message (where the recv buffer timeout remained
at 90 minutes). A few observations:
- for peers that support BIP 31 (pong messages), this recv buffer
timeout is almost redundant with the ping timeout. We send a ping
message every two minutes, and set a timeout of twenty minutes to
receive the pong response. If the recv buffer was really timing out,
then the pong response would also time out.
- BIP 31 is supported by all nodes of p2p version 60000 and higher, and
has been in widespread use since 2013. I'd be very surprised if there
are many nodes on the network that don't support pong messages.
- The recv buffer timeout is not specified in any p2p BIP. We're free to
set it at any value we want.
- A peer that doesn't support BIP 31 and hasn't sent any message to us
at all in 90 minutes is unlikely to be useful for us, and is more likely
to be evicted AttemptToEvictConnection() since it'll have the worst
possible ping time and isn't providing blocks/transactions.
Therefore, we remove this check, and set the recv buffer timeout to 20
minutes for all peers. This removes the final p2p version dependent
logic from the net layer, so all p2p version data can move into the
net_processing layer.
Alternative approaches:
- Set the recv buffer timeout to 90 minutes for all peers. This almost
wouldn't be a behaviour change at all (pre-BIP 31 peers would still
have the same recv buffer timeout, and we can't ever reach a recv buffer
timeout higher than 21 minutes for post-BIP31 peers, because the pong
timeout would be hit first).
- Stop supporting peers that don't support BIP 31. BIP 31 has been in
use since 2012, and implementing it is trivial.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK ea36a453e3
promag:
Code review ACK ea36a453e3.
practicalswift:
cr ACK ea36a453e3: patch looks correct
ajtowns:
ACK ea36a453e3
sipa:
utACK ea36a453e3
jonatack:
Code review ACK ea36a453e3
Tree-SHA512: df290bb32d2b5d9e59a0125bb215baa92787f9d01542a7437245f1c478c7f9b9831e5f170d3cd0db2811e1b11b857b3e8b2e03376476b8302148e480d81aab19
fa86217e97 doc: Move add relay comment in net to correct place (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The comment was previously attached to `m_addr_known`, but now it is attached to `id`, which is wrong.
Fix that by moving the comment to `RelayAddrsWithConn`.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa86217e97: patch looks correct
jnewbery:
ACK fa86217e97
theStack:
Code review ACK fa86217e97🌳
Tree-SHA512: ec3d5f1996aded38947d2a5fd0bb63539e88f83964cd3254984002edfd51abb4dde813c7c81619a8a3a5c55b7e9ae83c8c5be8ad6c84b4593ed3bbf463fe8979
The timeout interval for the send and recv buffers was changed from 90
minutes to 20 minutes in commit f1920e86 in 2013, except for peers that
did not support the pong message (where the recv buffer timeout remained
at 90 minutes). A few observations:
- for peers that support BIP 31 (pong messages), this recv buffer
timeout is almost redundant with the ping timeout. We send a ping
message every two minutes, and set a timeout of twenty minutes to
receive the pong response. If the recv buffer was really timing out,
then the pong response would also time out.
- BIP 31 is supported by all nodes of p2p version 60000 and higher, and
has been in widespread use since 2013. I'd be very surprised if there
are many nodes on the network that don't support pong messages.
- The recv buffer timeout is not specified in any p2p BIP. We're free to
set it at any value we want.
- A peer that doesn't support BIP 31 and hasn't sent any message to us
at all in 90 minutes is unlikely to be useful for us, and is more likely
to be evicted AttemptToEvictConnection() since it'll have the worst
possible ping time and isn't providing blocks/transactions.
Therefore, we remove this check, and sent the recv buffer timeout to 20
minutes for all peers. This removes the final p2p version dependent
logic from the net layer, so all p2p version data can move into the
net_processing layer.
Alternative approaches:
- Set the recv buffer timeout to 90 minutes for all peers. This almost
wouldn't be a behaviour change at all (pre-BIP 31 peers would still
have the same recv buffer timeout, and we can't ever reach a recv buffer
timeout higher than 21 minutes for post-BIP31 peers, because the pong
timeout would be hit first).
- Stop supporting peers that don't support BIP 31. BIP 31 has been in
use since 2012, and implementing it is trivial.
It's not actually possible to change this value, so remove the
indirection of it being a conn option.
DEFAULT_MAX_UPLOAD_TIMEFRAME is a compile time constant.
To make eclipse attacks more difficult, regularly initiate outbound connections
and stay connected long enough to sync headers and potentially learn of new
blocks. If we learn a new block, rotate out an existing block-relay peer in
favor of the new peer.
This augments the existing outbound peer rotation that exists -- currently we
make new full-relay connections when our tip is stale, which we disconnect
after waiting a small time to see if we learn a new block. As block-relay
connections use minimal bandwidth, we can make these connections regularly and
not just when our tip is stale.
Like feeler connections, these connections are not aggressive; whenever our
timer fires (once every 5 minutes on average), we'll try to initiate a new
block-relay connection as described, but if we fail to connect we just wait for
our timer to fire again before repeating with a new peer.
343dc4760f test: add test for high-bandwidth mode states in getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dab6583307 doc: release note for new getpeerinfo fields "bip152_hb_{from,to}" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a7ed00f8bb rpc: expose high-bandwidth mode states via getpeerinfo (Sebastian Falbesoner)
30bc8fab68 net: save high-bandwidth mode states in CNodeStats (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Fixes#19676, "_For every peer expose through getpeerinfo RPC whether or not we selected them as HB peers, and whether or not they selected us as HB peers._" See [BIP152](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki), in particular the [protocol flow diagram](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/raw/master/bip-0152/protocol-flow.png). The newly introduced states are changed on the following places in the code:
* on reception of a `SENDCMPCT` message with valid version, the field `m_highbandwidth_from` is changed depending on the first integer parameter in the message (1=high bandwidth, 0=low bandwidth), i.e. it just mirrors the field `CNodeState.fPreferHeaderAndIDs`.
* after adding a `SENDCMPCT` message to the send queue, the field `m_highbandwidth_to` is changed depending on how the first integer parameter is set (same as above)
Note that after receiving `VERACK`, the node also sends `SENDCMPCT`, but that is only to announce the preferred version and never selects high-bandwidth mode, hence there is no need to change the state variables there, which are initialized to `false` anyways.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
reACK 343dc4760f
jonatack:
re-ACK 343dc4760f per `git range-diff 7ea6499 4df1d12 343dc47`
Tree-SHA512: f4999e6a935266812c2259a9b5dc459710037d3c9e938006d282557cc225e56128f72965faffb207fc60c6531fab1206db976dd8729a69e8ca29d4835317b99f
fa5ed3b4ca net: Use Span in ReceiveMsgBytes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Pass a data pointer and a size as span in `ReceiveMsgBytes` to get the benefits of a span
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK fa5ed3b4ca code review, rebased to current master 12a1c3ad1a, debug build, unit tests, ran bitcoind/-netinfo/getpeerinfo
theStack:
ACK fa5ed3b4ca
Tree-SHA512: 89bf111323148d6e6e50185ad20ab39f73ab3a58a27e46319e3a08bcf5dcf9d6aa84faff0fd6afb90cb892ac2f557a237c144560986063bc736a69ace353ab9d
Outbound peer logic prevents connecting to addresses that we're already
connected to, so prevent inadvertent eviction of current peers via
test-before-evict by checking this condition and marking current peer's
addresses as Good().
Co-authored-by: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com>
