Fix the following error in travis:
test/validationinterface_tests.cpp:26:36: error: default initialization of an object of const type 'const BlockValidationState' without a user-provided default constructor
const BlockValidationState state_dummy;
7777f2a4bb miner: Avoid stack-use-after-return in validationinterface (MarcoFalke)
fa5ceb25fc test: Remove UninterruptibleSleep from test and replace it by SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue (MarcoFalke)
fa770ce7fe validationinterface: Rework documentation, Rename pwalletIn to callbacks (MarcoFalke)
fab6d060ce test: Add unregister_validation_interface_race test (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
When a validationinterface has itself unregistered in one thread, but is about to get executed in another thread [1], there is a race:
* The validationinterface destructing itself
* The validationinterface getting dereferenced for execution
[1] 64139803f1/src/validationinterface.cpp (L82-L83)
This happens in the miner. More generally it happens everywhere where at least one thread is generating notifications and another one is unregistering a validationinterface.
This issue has been fixed in commit ab31b9d6fe, but the fix has not been applied to the miner.
Example where this happened in practice: https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/675322230#L4414
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK 7777f2a4bb.
laanwj:
Code review ACK 7777f2a4bb
Tree-SHA512: 8087119243c71ba18a823a63515f3730d127162625d8729024278b447af29e2ff206f4840ee3d90bf84f93a2c5ab73b76c7e7044c83aa93b5b51047a166ec3d3
This commit is (intentionally) adding a broken test. The test is broken
because it registering a subscriber object that can go out of scope
while events are still being sent.
To run the broken test and reproduce the bug:
- Remove comment /** and */
- ./configure --with-sanitizers=address
- export ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0
- make
- while ./src/test/test_bitcoin -t validationinterface_tests/unregister_validation_interface_race --catch_system_errors=no ; do true; done
df6bde031b test: remove glibc fdelt sanity check (fanquake)
8bf1540cc2 build: remove fdelt_chk backwards compatibility code (fanquake)
Pull request description:
ae30d40e50
The return type of [`fdelt_chk`](https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=debug/fdelt_chk.c;h=f62ce7349707cb68f55831c1c591fd7387a90258;hb=HEAD) changed from `unsigned long int` to `long int` in glibc 2.16. See [this commit](https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=ceb9e56b3d1f8c1922e0526c2e841373843460e2). Now that we require [glibc >=2.17](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17538) we can remove our back-compat code.
ab7bce584a
While looking at the above changes, I noticed that our glibc fdelt sanity check doesn't seem to be checking anything. `fdelt_warn()` also isn't something we'd want to actually "trigger" at runtime, as doing so would cause `bitcoind` to abort.
The comments:
> // trigger: Call FD_SET to trigger __fdelt_chk. FORTIFY_SOURCE must be defined
> // as >0 and optimizations must be set to at least -O2.
suggest calling FD_SET to check the invocation of `fdelt_chk` (this is [aliased with fdelt_warn in glibc](https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=debug/fdelt_chk.c;h=f62ce7349707cb68f55831c1c591fd7387a90258;hb=HEAD)). However just calling `FD_SET()` will not necessarily cause the compiler to insert a call to `fd_warn()`.
Whether or not GCC (recent Clang should work, but may use different heuristics) inserts a call to `fdelt_warn()` depends on if the compiler can determine if the value passed in is a compile time constant (using [`__builtin_constant_p`](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Other-Builtins.html)) and whether the value is < 0 or >= `FD_SETSIZE`. The glibc implementation is [here](https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=misc/bits/select2.h;h=7e17430ed94dd1679af10afa3d74795f9c97c0e8;hb=HEAD). This means our check should never cause a call to be inserted.
Compiling master without `--glibc-back-compat` (if you do pass `--glibc-back-compat` the outcome is still the same; however the abort will only happen with >=`FD_SETSIZE` as that is what our [fdelt_warn()](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/compat/glibc_compat.cpp#L24) checks for), there are no calls to `fdelt_warn()` inserted by the compiler:
```bash
objdump -dC bitcoind | grep sanity_fdelt
...
0000000000399d20 <sanity_test_fdelt()>:
399d20: 48 81 ec 98 00 00 00 sub $0x98,%rsp
399d27: b9 10 00 00 00 mov $0x10,%ecx
399d2c: 64 48 8b 04 25 28 00 mov %fs:0x28,%rax
399d33: 00 00
399d35: 48 89 84 24 88 00 00 mov %rax,0x88(%rsp)
399d3c: 00
399d3d: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
399d3f: 48 89 e7 mov %rsp,%rdi
399d42: fc cld
399d43: f3 48 ab rep stos %rax,%es:(%rdi)
399d46: 48 8b 84 24 88 00 00 mov 0x88(%rsp),%rax
399d4d: 00
399d4e: 64 48 33 04 25 28 00 xor %fs:0x28,%rax
399d55: 00 00
399d57: 75 0d jne 399d66 <sanity_test_fdelt()+0x46>
399d59: b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%eax
399d5e: 48 81 c4 98 00 00 00 add $0x98,%rsp
399d65: c3 retq
399d66: e8 85 df c8 ff callq 27cf0 <__stack_chk_fail@plt>
399d6b: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
```
If you modify the sanity test to pass `-1` or `FD_SETSIZE` to `FD_SET`, you'll see calls to `fdelt_warn` inserted, and the runtime behaviour is an abort as expected.
```diff
diff --git a/src/compat/glibc_sanity_fdelt.cpp b/src/compat/glibc_sanity_fdelt.cpp
index 87140d0c7..16974bfa0 100644
--- a/src/compat/glibc_sanity_fdelt.cpp
+++ b/src/compat/glibc_sanity_fdelt.cpp
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ bool sanity_test_fdelt()
{
fd_set fds;
FD_ZERO(&fds);
- FD_SET(0, &fds);
+ FD_SET(FD_SETSIZE, &fds);
return FD_ISSET(0, &fds);
}
#endif
```
```bash
0000000000399d20 <sanity_test_fdelt()>:
399d20: 48 81 ec 98 00 00 00 sub $0x98,%rsp
399d27: b9 10 00 00 00 mov $0x10,%ecx
399d2c: 64 48 8b 04 25 28 00 mov %fs:0x28,%rax
399d33: 00 00
399d35: 48 89 84 24 88 00 00 mov %rax,0x88(%rsp)
399d3c: 00
399d3d: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
399d3f: 48 89 e7 mov %rsp,%rdi
399d42: fc cld
399d43: f3 48 ab rep stos %rax,%es:(%rdi)
399d46: 48 c7 c7 ff ff ff ff mov $0xffffffffffffffff,%rdi
399d4d: e8 3e ff ff ff callq 399c90 <__fdelt_warn>
399d52: 0f b6 04 24 movzbl (%rsp),%eax
399d56: 83 e0 01 and $0x1,%eax
399d59: 48 8b 94 24 88 00 00 mov 0x88(%rsp),%rdx
399d60: 00
399d61: 64 48 33 14 25 28 00 xor %fs:0x28,%rdx
399d68: 00 00
399d6a: 75 08 jne 399d74 <sanity_test_fdelt()+0x54>
399d6c: 48 81 c4 98 00 00 00 add $0x98,%rsp
399d73: c3 retq
399d74: e8 77 df c8 ff callq 27cf0 <__stack_chk_fail@plt>
399d79: 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 nopl 0x0(%rax)
```
```bash
src/bitcoind
*** buffer overflow detected ***: src/bitcoind terminated
Aborted
```
I think the test should should be removed and replaced (if possible) with additional checks in security-check.py. I was thinking about adding a version of [this script](https://github.com/fanquake/core-review/blob/master/fortify.py) as part of the output, but that needs more thought. I'll address this in a follow up.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK df6bde031b
Tree-SHA512: d8b3af4f4eb2d6c767ca6e72ece51d0ab9042e1bbdfcbbdb7ad713414df21489ba3217662b531b8bfdac0265d2ce5431abfae6e861b6187d182ff26c6e59b32d
9f59dde974 rpc: Relock wallet only if most recent callback (João Barbosa)
a2e6db5c4f rpc: Add mutex to guard deadlineTimers (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes an early relocking race condition from #18811 where old relock callback runs after new wallet unlock code and nRelockTime update but before rpcRunLater call, causing early relock and incorrect nRelockTime time
Issue introduced in #18487.
Fixes#18811.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 9f59dde974
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9f59dde974. No changes since last review except squashing commits.
jonatack:
ACK 9f59dde974
Tree-SHA512: 2f7fc03e5ab6037337f2d82dfad432495cc337c77d07c968ee2355105db6292f24543c03456f5402e0e759577a4327758f9372f7ea29de6d56dc3695fda9b379
a8b5f1b133 gui: Fix manual coin control with multiple wallets loaded (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This PR ensures each loaded wallet has a dedicated coin control in the send view which is manipulated by the coin control dialog.
This is an alternative to #17457. Two main differences are:
- scope reduced - no unnecessary changes unrelated to the fix;
- approach taken - coin control instance now belongs to the send view.
All problems raised in #17457 reviews no longer apply due to the approach taken - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17457#pullrequestreview-319297589 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17457#issuecomment-555920829)
No change in behavior if only one wallet is loaded.
Closes#15725.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK a8b5f1b133
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK a8b5f1b133. Code changes are very straightforward, just replacing global CCoinControl object with SendCoinsDialog member. Not sure if this means coin control settings are reset between payments. It would be good to note in the PR description or release notes if single wallet behavior is affected
hebasto:
ACK a8b5f1b133
Sjors:
tACK a8b5f1b133
Tree-SHA512: 3ad9c51bab6f28ec0e90efbd6f43fa510c81dafb2eff0b8c3724efcee3e030054a10be013e27cefe35763374c5f6d7af8c02658736964f733d7e38b646b5df65
e8123eae40 gui: Fix itemWalletAddress leak when not tree mode (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Taken from #17457, the first commit is a similar to 88a94f7bb8 but for test binary, and the second commit fixes a leak where `CCoinControlWidgetItem` are unnecessarily created and leaked.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK e8123eae40
hebasto:
ACK e8123eae40, tested on Linux Mint 19.3.
Tree-SHA512: 8b43cb29de103842ce5f048de51222919540d3212d2873c16731145e856178644041924ad0e9a58c2ff08f209a9b4ac26dc9965289eb719da233c0984f93631e
839add193b build: Enable -Wsuggest-override (Hennadii Stepanov)
de5e91c303 refactor: Add BerkeleyDatabaseVersion() function (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
From GCC [docs](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-9.2.0/gcc/Warning-Options.html):
> `-Wsuggest-override`
> Warn about overriding virtual functions that are not marked with the override keyword.
~This PR is based on #16722 (the first commit).~ See: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16722#issuecomment-584111086
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 839add193b
vasild:
ACK 839add193
practicalswift:
ACK 839add193b assuming Travis is happy: patch looks correct
Tree-SHA512: 1e8cc085da30d41536deff9b181962c1882314ab252c2ad958294087ae1e5a0dfa4886bdbe36f21cf6ae71df776a8420f349f007d4b5b49fd79ba98ce308965a
e3047edfb6 test: use p2p constants in denial of service tests (fanquake)
25d8264c95 p2p: add MAX_FEELER_CONNECTIONS constant (tryphe)
Pull request description:
Extracted from #16003.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK e3047ed
Tree-SHA512: 14fc15292be4db2e825a0331dd189a48713464f622a91c589122c1a7135bcfd37a61e64af1e76d32880ded09c24efd54d3c823467d6c35367a380e0be33bd35f
23083856a5 [test] Add test for cfcheckpt (Jim Posen)
f9e00bb25a [net processing] Message handling for getcfcheckpt. (Jim Posen)
9ccaaba11e [init] Add -peerblockfilters option (Jim Posen)
Pull request description:
Serve cfcheckpt messages if basic block filter index is enabled and `-peercfilters` is set.
`NODE_COMPACT_FILTERS` is not signaled to peers, but functionality can be used for testing and serving pre-configured clients.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Code review re-ACK 23083856a5 the only change since my review @ 967e2b1 is an update required for #16224 that was merged yesterday.
fjahr:
re-ACK 23083856a5
jkczyz:
re-ACK 23083856a5
ariard:
re-Code Review ACK 2308385
clarkmoody:
Tested ACK 23083856a
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 23083856a5🌳
theStack:
ACK 23083856a5
Tree-SHA512: 8c751bbd7d1c31a413096462ae025c3d2f3163c7016cbec472a5f5ec267f8dd19a2dfc4d749876d7409c1db546e6fdd16461c6863effcfa0d3e993edcfa92a08
83da576f44 net: use CMessageHeader::HEADER_SIZE, add missing include (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
as suggested 16 months ago by Gleb Naumenko in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15197#issuecomment-456181865.
`static constexpr CMessageHeader::HEADER_SIZE` is already used in this file, `src/net.cpp`, in 2 instances. This commit replaces the remaining 2 integer values in the file with it and adds the explicit include header.
Co-authored by: Gleb Naumenko <naumenko.gs@gmail.com>
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK 83da576
practicalswift:
ACK 83da576f44 -- patch looks correct
theStack:
ACK 83da576f44 -- verified that its just magic number elimination refactoring and additionally checked that all tests pass 👍
Tree-SHA512: 5b915483bca4ea162c259865a1b615d73b88a1b1db3f82db05f770d10b8a42494d948f5b21badbcce2d9efa5915b8cbb6af83073867c23d2f152c0d35ac37b96
9847e205bf [docs] Improve commenting in ProcessGetData() (John Newbery)
2f032556e0 [test] test that an invalid GETDATA doesn't prevent processing of future messages (Amiti Uttarwar)
e257cf71c8 [net processing] ignore unknown INV types in GETDATA messages (Amiti Uttarwar)
047ceac142 [net processing] ignore tx GETDATA from blocks-only peers (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
Currently we'll stall peers that send us an unknown INV type in a GETDATA message. Be a bit more friendly and just drop the invalid request.
Ditto for blocks-relay-only peers that send us a GETDATA for a transaction.
There's a test for the first part. The second is difficult to test in the functional test framework since we aren't able to make blocks-relay-only connections.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 9847e205bf
brakmic:
ACK 9847e205bf
luke-jr:
utACK 9847e205bf
naumenkogs:
utACK 9847e20
ajtowns:
utACK 9847e205bf
Tree-SHA512: 6007f2fd839ffe737727f6fb8e8f083b2d9e05a510748f1d40b8f9be8fdf7b5419a36d8f1039923eec1ba2983e8f6f0436ec5fc196d9f6dcb0657f2ff8ff8e4c
d044e0ec7d refactor: Remove override for final overriders (Hennadii Stepanov)
1551cea2d5 refactor: Use override for non-final overriders (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Two commits are split out from #16710 to make reviewing [easier](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16710#issuecomment-625760894).
From [C++ FAQ](https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines.html#c128-virtual-functions-should-specify-exactly-one-of-virtual-override-or-final):
> C.128: Virtual functions should specify exactly one of virtual, override, or final
> **Reason** Readability. Detection of mistakes. Writing explicit `virtual`, `override`, or `final` is self-documenting and enables the compiler to catch mismatch of types and/or names between base and derived classes. However, writing more than one of these three is both redundant and a potential source of errors.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK d044e0ec7d: consistent use of `override` prevents bugs + patch looks correct + Travis happy
MarcoFalke:
ACK d044e0ec7d, based on my understanding that adding `override` or `final` to a function must always be correct, unless it doesn't compile!?
vasild:
ACK d044e0ec7
Tree-SHA512: 245fd9b99b8b5cbf8694061f892cb3435f3378c97ebed9f9401ce86d21890211f2234bcc39c9f0f79a4d2806cb31bf8ce41a0f9c2acef4f3a2ac5beca6b077cf
68537275bd build: Enable -Werror=sign-compare (Ben Woosley)
eac6a3080d refactor: Rework asmap Interpret to avoid ptrdiff_t (Ben Woosley)
df37377e30 test: Fix outstanding -Wsign-compare errors (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
Disallowing sign-comparison mismatches can help to prevent the introduction of overflow and interpretation bugs.
In this case, ~all~ most existing violations are in the tests, and most simply required annotating the literal as unsigned for comparison.
This was previously prevented by violations in leveldb which were fixed upstream and merged in #17398. You can test that by building this branch against: 22d11187ee vs 75fb37ce68
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK 68537275bd
practicalswift:
ACK 68537275bd
Tree-SHA512: 14b5daa38c496fb51548feb30fb4dd179e6f76a8d355f52bc8e2a18f2f9340f0bc98dcf36d8b3d6521045d013891c3103749a4eda88ceef00202a6a0cf93f73c
static constexpr CMessageHeader::HEADER_SIZE is already used in this file,
src/net.cpp, in 2 instances. This commit replaces the remaining 2 integer
values with it and adds the explicit include header.
Co-authored by: Gleb Naumenko <naumenko.gs@gmail.com>
When a node is configured with --blockfilterindex=basic and
-peerblockfilters it can serve compact block filters to its peers.
This commit adds the configuration option handling. Future commits
add compact block serving and service bits signaling.
As is, this sanity check doesn't seem to be testing fdelt_chk, because
passing a value of "0" to FD_SET wont cause the compiler to insert any
calls to fdelt_chk().
The documentation is a little misleading. If we actually triggered fdelt_chk
at runtime, bitcoind would abort. I think this check would be better replaced
(if possible) by additional checks in security-check.py.
The compiler may insert a call to fdelt_warn() (aliased with fdelt_chk
in glibc) at compile time if it can determine that an invalid value is
being passed to FD_SET.
These checks are essentially; value < 0 or value >= FD_SETSIZE along
with a check for wether the value is a compile time constant.
If the compiler can determine an invalid value is being passed, a call
to fdelt_warn will be inserted. Passing 0 should never cause a call to
be inserted.
You can check this after compiling:
```bash
objdump -dC bitcoind | grep sanity_fdelt
...
0000000000399d20 <sanity_test_fdelt()>:
399d20: 48 81 ec 98 00 00 00 sub $0x98,%rsp
399d27: b9 10 00 00 00 mov $0x10,%ecx
399d2c: 64 48 8b 04 25 28 00 mov %fs:0x28,%rax
399d33: 00 00
399d35: 48 89 84 24 88 00 00 mov %rax,0x88(%rsp)
399d3c: 00
399d3d: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
399d3f: 48 89 e7 mov %rsp,%rdi
399d42: fc cld
399d43: f3 48 ab rep stos %rax,%es:(%rdi)
399d46: 48 8b 84 24 88 00 00 mov 0x88(%rsp),%rax
399d4d: 00
399d4e: 64 48 33 04 25 28 00 xor %fs:0x28,%rax
399d55: 00 00
399d57: 75 0d jne 399d66 <sanity_test_fdelt()+0x46>
399d59: b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%eax
399d5e: 48 81 c4 98 00 00 00 add $0x98,%rsp
399d65: c3 retq
399d66: e8 85 df c8 ff callq 27cf0 <__stack_chk_fail@plt>
399d6b: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
```
To test, you could modify this test to pass -1 to FD_SET, and check
that a call to fdelt_warn() is inserted, and that running bitcoind
fails. i.e:
```bash
0000000000399d20 <sanity_test_fdelt()>:
399d20: 48 81 ec 98 00 00 00 sub $0x98,%rsp
399d27: b9 10 00 00 00 mov $0x10,%ecx
399d2c: 64 48 8b 04 25 28 00 mov %fs:0x28,%rax
399d33: 00 00
399d35: 48 89 84 24 88 00 00 mov %rax,0x88(%rsp)
399d3c: 00
399d3d: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
399d3f: 48 89 e7 mov %rsp,%rdi
399d42: fc cld
399d43: f3 48 ab rep stos %rax,%es:(%rdi)
399d46: 48 c7 c7 ff ff ff ff mov $0xffffffffffffffff,%rdi
399d4d: e8 3e ff ff ff callq 399c90 <__fdelt_warn>
399d52: 0f b6 04 24 movzbl (%rsp),%eax
399d56: 83 e0 01 and $0x1,%eax
399d59: 48 8b 94 24 88 00 00 mov 0x88(%rsp),%rdx
399d60: 00
399d61: 64 48 33 14 25 28 00 xor %fs:0x28,%rdx
399d68: 00 00
399d6a: 75 08 jne 399d74 <sanity_test_fdelt()+0x54>
399d6c: 48 81 c4 98 00 00 00 add $0x98,%rsp
399d73: c3 retq
399d74: e8 77 df c8 ff callq 27cf0 <__stack_chk_fail@plt>
399d79: 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 nopl 0x0(%rax)
```
```bash
./src/bitcoind
*** buffer overflow detected ***: src/bitcoind terminated
Aborted
```
748977690e Add asmap_direct fuzzer that tests Interpreter directly (Pieter Wuille)
7cf97fda15 Make asmap Interpreter errors fatal and fuzz test it (Pieter Wuille)
c81aefc537 Add additional effiency checks to sanity checker (Pieter Wuille)
fffd8dca2d Add asmap sanity checker (Pieter Wuille)
5feefbe6e7 Improve asmap Interpret checks and document failures (Pieter Wuille)
2b3dbfa5a6 Deal with decoding failures explicitly in asmap Interpret (Pieter Wuille)
1479007a33 Introduce Instruction enum in asmap (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This improves/documents the failure cases inside the asmap interpreter. None of the changes are bug fixes (they only change behavior for corrupted asmap files), but they may make things easier to follow.
In a second step, a sanity checker is added that effectively executes every potential code path through the asmap file, checking the same failure cases as the interpreter, and more. It takes around 30 ms to run for me for a 1.2 MB asmap file.
I've verified that this accepts asmap files constructed by https://github.com/sipa/asmap/blob/master/buildmap.py with a large dataset, and no longer accepts it with 1 bit changed in it.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 748977690e modulo feedback below.
jonatack:
ACK 748977690e code review, regular build/tests/ran bitcoin with -asmap, fuzz build/ran both fuzzers overnight.
fjahr:
ACK 748977690e
Tree-SHA512: d876df3859735795c857c83e7155ba6851ce839bdfa10c18ce2698022cc493ce024b5578c1828e2a94bcdf2552c2f46c392a251ed086691b41959e62a6970821
fa47cf9d95 wallet: Fix typo in assert that is compile-time true (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Commit 92bcd70808 presumably added a check that a `dest` of type `CNoDestination` implies an empty `scriptChange`.
However, it accidentally checked for `boost::variant::empty`, which always returns false: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_72_0/doc/html/boost/variant.html#id-1_3_46_5_4_1_1_16_2-bb
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK fa47cf9d95
Tree-SHA512: 9626b1e2947039853703932a362c2ee204e002d3344856eb93eef0e0f833401336f2dfa80fd43b83c8ec6eac624e6302aee771fb67aec436ba6483be02b8d615
71f183a49b build: warn on potentially uninitialized reads (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
* Enable `conditional-uninitialized` warning class to show potentially uninitialized
reads.
* Fix the sole such warning in Bitcoin Core in `GetRdRand()`: `r1` would be
set to `0` on `rdrand` failure, so initializing it to `0` is a non-functional
change.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 71f183a49b
laanwj:
ACK 71f183a49b
Tree-SHA512: 2c1d8caacd86424b16a9d92e5df19e0bedb51ae111eecad7e3bfa46447bc88e5fff1f32dacf6c4a28257ebb3d87e79f80f074ce2c523ce08b1a0c0a67ab44204
fa09110ebb doc: Fix typo in Coin doxygen comment (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`CTxOutCompressor` has been renamed in commit 4de934b9b5, so rename it in the docs as well.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa09110ebb
hebasto:
ACK fa09110ebb
Tree-SHA512: e16a21ac3112a67ee7d5ffabb3f47103aed8f91fdebf1bf96311cd0b7bdb9b7323ed826bfa95517386d4128ff0ae2c7c13bad047a7c5a0cc2458be7a43119157
1ad8ea2b73 net: remove is{Empty,Full} flags from CBloomFilter, clarify CVE fix (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The BIP37 bloom filter class `CBloomFilter` contains two flags `isEmpty`/`isFull` together with an update method with the purpose to, according to the comments, "avoid wasting cpu", i.e. the mechanism should serve as an optimization for the trivial cases of empty (all bits zero) or full (all bits one) filters.
However, the real reason of adding those flags (introduced with commit 37c6389c5a by gmaxwell) was a _covert fix_ of [CVE-2013-5700](https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2013-5700), a vulnerability that allowed a divide-by-zero remote node crash.
According to gmaxwell himself (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9060#issuecomment-257749165):
> the IsEmpty/IsFull optimizations were largely a pretextual optimization intended to make unexploitable a remote crash vulnerability (integer division by zero) that existed in the original bloom filtering code without disclosing it. I'm doubtful that they are all that useful. :)
For more information on how to trigger this crash, see PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18515 which contains a detailled description and a regression test. It has also been discussed on a [recent PR club meeting on fuzzing](https://bitcoincore.reviews/18521.html).
The covert fix code already led to issues and PR based on the wrong assumption that the flags are there for optimization reasons (see #16886 and #16922). This PR gets rid of the flags and the update method and just focuses on the CVE fix itself, i.e. it can be seen as a revert of the covert fix commit modulo the actual fix.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
utACK 1ad8ea2b73
laanwj:
Concept and code review ACK 1ad8ea2b73
jkczyz:
ACK 1ad8ea2b73
MarcoFalke:
ACK 1ad8ea2b73
fjahr:
Code review ACK 1ad8ea2b73
Tree-SHA512: 29f7ff9faece0285e11e16c024851f5bcb772dec64118ccc3f9067ec256267ec8e1b1e3105c7de2a72fd122c3b085e8fc840ab8f4e49813f1cc7a444df1867f7
28b112e9bd Get rid of BindWallet (Russell Yanofsky)
d002f9d15d Disable CWalletTx copy constructor (Russell Yanofsky)
65b9d8f8dd Avoid copying CWalletTx in LoadToWallet (Russell Yanofsky)
bd2fbc7cdb Get rid of unneeded CWalletTx::Init parameter (Russell Yanofsky)
2b9cba2065 Remove CWalletTx merging logic from AddToWallet (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This is a pure refactoring, no behavior is changing.
Instead of AddToWallet taking a temporary CWalletTx object and then potentially merging it with a pre-existing CWalletTx, have it take a callback so callers can update the pre-existing CWalletTx directly.
This makes AddToWallet simpler because now it is only has to be concerned with saving CWalletTx objects and not merging them.
This makes AddToWallet calls clearer because they can now make direct updates to CWalletTx entries without having to make temporary objects and then worry about how they will be merged.
Motivation for this change came from the bumpfee PR #8456 where we wanted to be able to call AddToWallet to make a simple update to an existing transaction, but were reluctant to, because the existing CWalletTx merging logic did not apply and seemed dangerous try to update as part of that PR. After this refactoring, the bumpfee PR could call AddToWallet safely instead of implementing a duplicate AddToWallet function.
This also allows getting rid of the CWalletTx copy constructor to prevent unintentional copying.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Anyway, re-ACK 28b112e9bd
Tree-SHA512: 528dd088714472a237500b200f4433db850bdb7fc29c5e5d81cae48072061dfb967f7c37edd90b33f24901239f9be982988547c1f8c80abc25fb243fbf7330ef
2a78098098 wallet: Make sure no WalletDescriptor members are uninitialized after construction (practicalswift)
ff046aeeba wallet: Make sure no DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan members are uninitialized after construction (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
This is a small folllow-up to #16528 ("Native Descriptor Wallets using DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan") which was merged in to `master` a couple of hours ago.
Make sure no `DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan` or `WalletDescriptor` members are left uninitialized after construction.
Before this change `bool m_internal` was left uninitialized when using the `DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan(WalletStorage&, WalletDescriptor&)` ctor.
The same goes for the now initialized integers which were left uninitialized when using the `WalletDescriptor()` ctor.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 2a78098098
fjahr:
Code review ACK 2a78098098
Sjors:
utACK 2a78098
achow101:
ACK 2a78098098
brakmic:
Code review ACK 2a78098098
meshcollider:
utACK 2a78098098
Tree-SHA512: c98e035268fdc7f65a423b73ac0cf010b0ef7c5e679b3cf170c1813efac8ab5c657dcbaf43c746770bea59e4772bfefe4caa834f1175260c39c7f35d92946ba5
