mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2025-01-10 03:47:29 -03:00
net_processing: remove Misbehavior score and increments
This is now all unused.
This commit is contained in:
parent
6457c31197
commit
ae60d485da
4 changed files with 31 additions and 51 deletions
|
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ class CSubNet;
|
|||
// disk on shutdown and reloaded on startup. Banning can be used to
|
||||
// prevent connections with spy nodes or other griefers.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 2. Discouragement. If a peer misbehaves enough (see Misbehaving() in
|
||||
// 2. Discouragement. If a peer misbehaves (see Misbehaving() in
|
||||
// net_processing.cpp), we'll mark that address as discouraged. We still allow
|
||||
// incoming connections from them, but they're preferred for eviction when
|
||||
// we receive new incoming connections. We never make outgoing connections to
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -223,8 +223,6 @@ struct Peer {
|
|||
|
||||
/** Protects misbehavior data members */
|
||||
Mutex m_misbehavior_mutex;
|
||||
/** Accumulated misbehavior score for this peer */
|
||||
int m_misbehavior_score GUARDED_BY(m_misbehavior_mutex){0};
|
||||
/** Whether this peer should be disconnected and marked as discouraged (unless it has NetPermissionFlags::NoBan permission). */
|
||||
bool m_should_discourage GUARDED_BY(m_misbehavior_mutex){false};
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -521,7 +519,7 @@ public:
|
|||
m_best_height = height;
|
||||
m_best_block_time = time;
|
||||
};
|
||||
void UnitTestMisbehaving(NodeId peer_id, int howmuch) override EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(!m_peer_mutex) { Misbehaving(*Assert(GetPeerRef(peer_id)), howmuch, ""); };
|
||||
void UnitTestMisbehaving(NodeId peer_id) override EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(!m_peer_mutex) { Misbehaving(*Assert(GetPeerRef(peer_id)), ""); };
|
||||
void ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type, DataStream& vRecv,
|
||||
const std::chrono::microseconds time_received, const std::atomic<bool>& interruptMsgProc) override
|
||||
EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(!m_peer_mutex, !m_recent_confirmed_transactions_mutex, !m_most_recent_block_mutex, !m_headers_presync_mutex, g_msgproc_mutex);
|
||||
|
@ -546,11 +544,9 @@ private:
|
|||
* May return an empty shared_ptr if the Peer object can't be found. */
|
||||
PeerRef RemovePeer(NodeId id) EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(!m_peer_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Increment peer's misbehavior score. If the new value >= DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD, mark the node
|
||||
* to be discouraged, meaning the peer might be disconnected and added to the discouragement filter.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void Misbehaving(Peer& peer, int howmuch, const std::string& message);
|
||||
/** Mark a peer as misbehaving, which will cause it to be disconnected and its
|
||||
* address discouraged. */
|
||||
void Misbehaving(Peer& peer, const std::string& message);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Potentially mark a node discouraged based on the contents of a BlockValidationState object
|
||||
|
@ -1711,7 +1707,6 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ReattemptInitialBroadcast(CScheduler& scheduler)
|
|||
void PeerManagerImpl::FinalizeNode(const CNode& node)
|
||||
{
|
||||
NodeId nodeid = node.GetId();
|
||||
int misbehavior{0};
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -1722,7 +1717,6 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::FinalizeNode(const CNode& node)
|
|||
// destructed.
|
||||
PeerRef peer = RemovePeer(nodeid);
|
||||
assert(peer != nullptr);
|
||||
misbehavior = WITH_LOCK(peer->m_misbehavior_mutex, return peer->m_misbehavior_score);
|
||||
m_wtxid_relay_peers -= peer->m_wtxid_relay;
|
||||
assert(m_wtxid_relay_peers >= 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1765,7 +1759,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::FinalizeNode(const CNode& node)
|
|||
assert(m_orphanage.Size() == 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} // cs_main
|
||||
if (node.fSuccessfullyConnected && misbehavior == 0 &&
|
||||
if (node.fSuccessfullyConnected &&
|
||||
!node.IsBlockOnlyConn() && !node.IsInboundConn()) {
|
||||
// Only change visible addrman state for full outbound peers. We don't
|
||||
// call Connected() for feeler connections since they don't have
|
||||
|
@ -1886,25 +1880,13 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::AddToCompactExtraTransactions(const CTransactionRef& tx)
|
|||
vExtraTxnForCompactIt = (vExtraTxnForCompactIt + 1) % m_opts.max_extra_txs;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void PeerManagerImpl::Misbehaving(Peer& peer, int howmuch, const std::string& message)
|
||||
void PeerManagerImpl::Misbehaving(Peer& peer, const std::string& message)
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert(howmuch > 0);
|
||||
|
||||
LOCK(peer.m_misbehavior_mutex);
|
||||
const int score_before{peer.m_misbehavior_score};
|
||||
peer.m_misbehavior_score += howmuch;
|
||||
const int score_now{peer.m_misbehavior_score};
|
||||
|
||||
const std::string message_prefixed = message.empty() ? "" : (": " + message);
|
||||
std::string warning;
|
||||
|
||||
if (score_now >= DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD && score_before < DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD) {
|
||||
warning = " DISCOURAGE THRESHOLD EXCEEDED";
|
||||
peer.m_should_discourage = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Misbehaving: peer=%d (%d -> %d)%s%s\n",
|
||||
peer.m_id, score_before, score_now, warning, message_prefixed);
|
||||
LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "Misbehaving: peer=%d%s\n", peer.m_id, message_prefixed);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool PeerManagerImpl::MaybePunishNodeForBlock(NodeId nodeid, const BlockValidationState& state,
|
||||
|
@ -1922,7 +1904,7 @@ bool PeerManagerImpl::MaybePunishNodeForBlock(NodeId nodeid, const BlockValidati
|
|||
case BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS:
|
||||
case BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_MUTATED:
|
||||
if (!via_compact_block) {
|
||||
if (peer) Misbehaving(*peer, 100, message);
|
||||
if (peer) Misbehaving(*peer, message);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
@ -1937,7 +1919,7 @@ bool PeerManagerImpl::MaybePunishNodeForBlock(NodeId nodeid, const BlockValidati
|
|||
// Discourage outbound (but not inbound) peers if on an invalid chain.
|
||||
// Exempt HB compact block peers. Manual connections are always protected from discouragement.
|
||||
if (!via_compact_block && !node_state->m_is_inbound) {
|
||||
if (peer) Misbehaving(*peer, 100, message);
|
||||
if (peer) Misbehaving(*peer, message);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
@ -1945,11 +1927,11 @@ bool PeerManagerImpl::MaybePunishNodeForBlock(NodeId nodeid, const BlockValidati
|
|||
case BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_INVALID_HEADER:
|
||||
case BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CHECKPOINT:
|
||||
case BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_INVALID_PREV:
|
||||
if (peer) Misbehaving(*peer, 100, message);
|
||||
if (peer) Misbehaving(*peer, message);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
// Conflicting (but not necessarily invalid) data or different policy:
|
||||
case BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_MISSING_PREV:
|
||||
if (peer) Misbehaving(*peer, 100, message);
|
||||
if (peer) Misbehaving(*peer, message);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
case BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_RECENT_CONSENSUS_CHANGE:
|
||||
case BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_TIME_FUTURE:
|
||||
|
@ -1969,7 +1951,7 @@ bool PeerManagerImpl::MaybePunishNodeForTx(NodeId nodeid, const TxValidationStat
|
|||
break;
|
||||
// The node is providing invalid data:
|
||||
case TxValidationResult::TX_CONSENSUS:
|
||||
if (peer) Misbehaving(*peer, 100, "");
|
||||
if (peer) Misbehaving(*peer, "");
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
// Conflicting (but not necessarily invalid) data or different policy:
|
||||
case TxValidationResult::TX_RECENT_CONSENSUS_CHANGE:
|
||||
|
@ -2670,7 +2652,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::SendBlockTransactions(CNode& pfrom, Peer& peer, const CBlo
|
|||
BlockTransactions resp(req);
|
||||
for (size_t i = 0; i < req.indexes.size(); i++) {
|
||||
if (req.indexes[i] >= block.vtx.size()) {
|
||||
Misbehaving(peer, 100, "getblocktxn with out-of-bounds tx indices");
|
||||
Misbehaving(peer, "getblocktxn with out-of-bounds tx indices");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
resp.txn[i] = block.vtx[req.indexes[i]];
|
||||
|
@ -2683,13 +2665,13 @@ bool PeerManagerImpl::CheckHeadersPoW(const std::vector<CBlockHeader>& headers,
|
|||
{
|
||||
// Do these headers have proof-of-work matching what's claimed?
|
||||
if (!HasValidProofOfWork(headers, consensusParams)) {
|
||||
Misbehaving(peer, 100, "header with invalid proof of work");
|
||||
Misbehaving(peer, "header with invalid proof of work");
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Are these headers connected to each other?
|
||||
if (!CheckHeadersAreContinuous(headers)) {
|
||||
Misbehaving(peer, 100, "non-continuous headers sequence");
|
||||
Misbehaving(peer, "non-continuous headers sequence");
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
@ -3622,7 +3604,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessCompactBlockTxns(CNode& pfrom, Peer& peer, const Bl
|
|||
ReadStatus status = partialBlock.FillBlock(*pblock, block_transactions.txn);
|
||||
if (status == READ_STATUS_INVALID) {
|
||||
RemoveBlockRequest(block_transactions.blockhash, pfrom.GetId()); // Reset in-flight state in case Misbehaving does not result in a disconnect
|
||||
Misbehaving(peer, 100, "invalid compact block/non-matching block transactions");
|
||||
Misbehaving(peer, "invalid compact block/non-matching block transactions");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
} else if (status == READ_STATUS_FAILED) {
|
||||
if (first_in_flight) {
|
||||
|
@ -4106,7 +4088,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type,
|
|||
|
||||
if (vAddr.size() > MAX_ADDR_TO_SEND)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Misbehaving(*peer, 100, strprintf("%s message size = %u", msg_type, vAddr.size()));
|
||||
Misbehaving(*peer, strprintf("%s message size = %u", msg_type, vAddr.size()));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -4188,7 +4170,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type,
|
|||
vRecv >> vInv;
|
||||
if (vInv.size() > MAX_INV_SZ)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Misbehaving(*peer, 100, strprintf("inv message size = %u", vInv.size()));
|
||||
Misbehaving(*peer, strprintf("inv message size = %u", vInv.size()));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -4280,7 +4262,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type,
|
|||
vRecv >> vInv;
|
||||
if (vInv.size() > MAX_INV_SZ)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Misbehaving(*peer, 100, strprintf("getdata message size = %u", vInv.size()));
|
||||
Misbehaving(*peer, strprintf("getdata message size = %u", vInv.size()));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -4820,7 +4802,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type,
|
|||
ReadStatus status = partialBlock.InitData(cmpctblock, vExtraTxnForCompact);
|
||||
if (status == READ_STATUS_INVALID) {
|
||||
RemoveBlockRequest(pindex->GetBlockHash(), pfrom.GetId()); // Reset in-flight state in case Misbehaving does not result in a disconnect
|
||||
Misbehaving(*peer, 100, "invalid compact block");
|
||||
Misbehaving(*peer, "invalid compact block");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
} else if (status == READ_STATUS_FAILED) {
|
||||
if (first_in_flight) {
|
||||
|
@ -4965,7 +4947,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type,
|
|||
// Bypass the normal CBlock deserialization, as we don't want to risk deserializing 2000 full blocks.
|
||||
unsigned int nCount = ReadCompactSize(vRecv);
|
||||
if (nCount > MAX_HEADERS_RESULTS) {
|
||||
Misbehaving(*peer, 100, strprintf("headers message size = %u", nCount));
|
||||
Misbehaving(*peer, strprintf("headers message size = %u", nCount));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
headers.resize(nCount);
|
||||
|
@ -5012,7 +4994,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type,
|
|||
if (prev_block && IsBlockMutated(/*block=*/*pblock,
|
||||
/*check_witness_root=*/DeploymentActiveAfter(prev_block, m_chainman, Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_SEGWIT))) {
|
||||
LogDebug(BCLog::NET, "Received mutated block from peer=%d\n", peer->m_id);
|
||||
Misbehaving(*peer, 100, "mutated block");
|
||||
Misbehaving(*peer, "mutated block");
|
||||
WITH_LOCK(cs_main, RemoveBlockRequest(pblock->GetHash(), peer->m_id));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -5193,7 +5175,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type,
|
|||
if (!filter.IsWithinSizeConstraints())
|
||||
{
|
||||
// There is no excuse for sending a too-large filter
|
||||
Misbehaving(*peer, 100, "too-large bloom filter");
|
||||
Misbehaving(*peer, "too-large bloom filter");
|
||||
} else if (auto tx_relay = peer->GetTxRelay(); tx_relay != nullptr) {
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK(tx_relay->m_bloom_filter_mutex);
|
||||
|
@ -5229,7 +5211,7 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage(CNode& pfrom, const std::string& msg_type,
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (bad) {
|
||||
Misbehaving(*peer, 100, "bad filteradd message");
|
||||
Misbehaving(*peer, "bad filteradd message");
|
||||
}
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -25,8 +25,6 @@ static const uint32_t DEFAULT_MAX_ORPHAN_TRANSACTIONS{100};
|
|||
static const uint32_t DEFAULT_BLOCK_RECONSTRUCTION_EXTRA_TXN{100};
|
||||
static const bool DEFAULT_PEERBLOOMFILTERS = false;
|
||||
static const bool DEFAULT_PEERBLOCKFILTERS = false;
|
||||
/** Threshold for marking a node to be discouraged, e.g. disconnected and added to the discouragement filter. */
|
||||
static const int DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD{100};
|
||||
/** Maximum number of outstanding CMPCTBLOCK requests for the same block. */
|
||||
static const unsigned int MAX_CMPCTBLOCKS_INFLIGHT_PER_BLOCK = 3;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -104,7 +102,7 @@ public:
|
|||
virtual void SetBestBlock(int height, std::chrono::seconds time) = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Public for unit testing. */
|
||||
virtual void UnitTestMisbehaving(NodeId peer_id, int howmuch) = 0;
|
||||
virtual void UnitTestMisbehaving(NodeId peer_id) = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Evict extra outbound peers. If we think our tip may be stale, connect to an extra outbound.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement)
|
|||
peerLogic->InitializeNode(*nodes[0], NODE_NETWORK);
|
||||
nodes[0]->fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
|
||||
connman->AddTestNode(*nodes[0]);
|
||||
peerLogic->UnitTestMisbehaving(nodes[0]->GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD); // Should be discouraged
|
||||
peerLogic->UnitTestMisbehaving(nodes[0]->GetId()); // Should be discouraged
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(nodes[0]));
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr[0]));
|
||||
|
@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement)
|
|||
// [1] is not discouraged/disconnected yet.
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!banman->IsDiscouraged(addr[1]));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!nodes[1]->fDisconnect);
|
||||
peerLogic->UnitTestMisbehaving(nodes[1]->GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD); // [1] reaches discouragement threshold
|
||||
peerLogic->UnitTestMisbehaving(nodes[1]->GetId());
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(nodes[1]));
|
||||
// Expect both [0] and [1] to be discouraged/disconnected now.
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr[0]));
|
||||
|
@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(peer_discouragement)
|
|||
peerLogic->InitializeNode(*nodes[2], NODE_NETWORK);
|
||||
nodes[2]->fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
|
||||
connman->AddTestNode(*nodes[2]);
|
||||
peerLogic->UnitTestMisbehaving(nodes[2]->GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD);
|
||||
peerLogic->UnitTestMisbehaving(nodes[2]->GetId());
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(nodes[2]));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr[0]));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr[1]));
|
||||
|
@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime)
|
|||
peerLogic->InitializeNode(dummyNode, NODE_NETWORK);
|
||||
dummyNode.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
|
||||
|
||||
peerLogic->UnitTestMisbehaving(dummyNode.GetId(), DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD);
|
||||
peerLogic->UnitTestMisbehaving(dummyNode.GetId());
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(banman->IsDiscouraged(addr));
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue