mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2025-04-29 14:59:39 -04:00
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32129: doc: Update comments for AreInputsStandard to match code
52ede28a8a
doc: Update comments for AreInputsStandard to match code (Anthony Towns) Pull request description: The comment about extra data stuffed in scriptSigs was introduced in #4365 which introduced `ScriptSigArgsExpected()`, and became incorrect after #7387 / #7453 (checks are now performed by `SCRIPT_VERIFY_CLEANSTACK` during script validation and `IsPushOnly()` in `IsStandardTx()`). Drops the details on what a p2sh with many checksigs would look like, which was already done in #4365, but only for main.cpp not the duplicated comment in main.h, which was merged into policy/policy.cpp in #6335 and later moved to the right place in #10682. ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: ACK52ede28a8a
darosior: ACK52ede28a8a
Tree-SHA512: 5ee9a775c81d4c23aca2f8f938ab8bfa7605af489ddb78788613195be8744c7fb7a37bae271093f67f572577452651d4958706b55346e99cf8d32ac0fc34df03
This commit is contained in:
commit
8cc601196b
1 changed files with 11 additions and 13 deletions
|
@ -169,20 +169,18 @@ bool IsStandardTx(const CTransaction& tx, const std::optional<unsigned>& max_dat
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Check transaction inputs to mitigate two
|
||||
* potential denial-of-service attacks:
|
||||
* Check transaction inputs.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 1. scriptSigs with extra data stuffed into them,
|
||||
* not consumed by scriptPubKey (or P2SH script)
|
||||
* 2. P2SH scripts with a crazy number of expensive
|
||||
* CHECKSIG/CHECKMULTISIG operations
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Why bother? To avoid denial-of-service attacks; an attacker
|
||||
* can submit a standard HASH... OP_EQUAL transaction,
|
||||
* which will get accepted into blocks. The redemption
|
||||
* script can be anything; an attacker could use a very
|
||||
* expensive-to-check-upon-redemption script like:
|
||||
* DUP CHECKSIG DROP ... repeated 100 times... OP_1
|
||||
* This does three things:
|
||||
* * Prevents mempool acceptance of spends of future
|
||||
* segwit versions we don't know how to validate
|
||||
* * Mitigates a potential denial-of-service attack with
|
||||
* P2SH scripts with a crazy number of expensive
|
||||
* CHECKSIG/CHECKMULTISIG operations.
|
||||
* * Prevents spends of unknown/irregular scriptPubKeys,
|
||||
* which mitigates potential denial-of-service attacks
|
||||
* involving expensive scripts and helps reserve them
|
||||
* as potential new upgrade hooks.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note that only the non-witness portion of the transaction is checked here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue