mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2025-01-10 20:03:34 -03:00
Fix length of R check in test/key_tests.cpp:key_signature_tests
The code before the fix only checked the length of R value of the last signature in the loop, and only for equality (but the length can be less than 32) The fixed code checks that length of the R value is less than or equal to 32 on each iteration of the loop The BOOST_CHECK(sig.size() <= 70) is merged with sig[3] <= 32 check, and BOOST_CHECKs are moved outside the loop, for efficiency
This commit is contained in:
parent
1e9e4b68f3
commit
89895773b7
1 changed files with 16 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -172,20 +172,30 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(key_signature_tests)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
BOOST_CHECK(found);
|
BOOST_CHECK(found);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// When entropy is not specified, we should always see low R signatures that are less than 70 bytes in 256 tries
|
// When entropy is not specified, we should always see low R signatures that are less than or equal to 70 bytes in 256 tries
|
||||||
|
// The low R signatures should always have the value of their "length of R" byte less than or equal to 32
|
||||||
// We should see at least one signature that is less than 70 bytes.
|
// We should see at least one signature that is less than 70 bytes.
|
||||||
found = true;
|
|
||||||
bool found_small = false;
|
bool found_small = false;
|
||||||
|
bool found_big = false;
|
||||||
|
bool bad_sign = false;
|
||||||
for (int i = 0; i < 256; ++i) {
|
for (int i = 0; i < 256; ++i) {
|
||||||
sig.clear();
|
sig.clear();
|
||||||
std::string msg = "A message to be signed" + ToString(i);
|
std::string msg = "A message to be signed" + ToString(i);
|
||||||
msg_hash = Hash(msg);
|
msg_hash = Hash(msg);
|
||||||
BOOST_CHECK(key.Sign(msg_hash, sig));
|
if (!key.Sign(msg_hash, sig)) {
|
||||||
found = sig[3] == 0x20;
|
bad_sign = true;
|
||||||
BOOST_CHECK(sig.size() <= 70);
|
break;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
// sig.size() > 70 implies sig[3] > 32, because S is always low.
|
||||||
|
// But check both conditions anyway, just in case this implication is broken for some reason
|
||||||
|
if (sig[3] > 32 || sig.size() > 70) {
|
||||||
|
found_big = true;
|
||||||
|
break;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
found_small |= sig.size() < 70;
|
found_small |= sig.size() < 70;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
BOOST_CHECK(found);
|
BOOST_CHECK(!bad_sign);
|
||||||
|
BOOST_CHECK(!found_big);
|
||||||
BOOST_CHECK(found_small);
|
BOOST_CHECK(found_small);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue