test: clarify timewarp griefing attack

On testnet4 with the timewarp mitigation active, when pool software ignores the curtime and mintime fields provided by the getblocktemplate RPC or by createNewBlock() in the Mining interface, they are vulnerable to a griefing attack.

The test is expanded to illustrate this.
This commit is contained in:
Sjors Provoost 2025-01-06 14:59:32 +01:00
parent 0b4e4d6f34
commit 5ba770089e
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 57FF9BDBCC301009

View file

@ -136,22 +136,39 @@ class MiningTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
for _ in range(n):
t += 600
self.nodes[0].setmocktime(t)
node.setmocktime(t)
self.generate(self.wallet, 1, sync_fun=self.no_op)
self.log.info("Create block two hours in the future")
self.nodes[0].setmocktime(t + MAX_FUTURE_BLOCK_TIME)
self.log.info("Create block MAX_TIMEWARP < t < MAX_FUTURE_BLOCK_TIME in the future")
# A timestamp that's more than MAX_TIMEWARP seconds in the future can
# happen by accident, due to a combination of pool software that doesn't
# use "curtime" AND has a faulty clock.
#
# But it could also be intentional, at the end of a retarget period, in
# order to make the next block miner violate the time-timewarp-attack rule.
# For this attack to succeed the victim miner needs to ignore both our
# "curtime" and "mintime" values AND use wall clock time. This is true even
# if the victim miner implements the MTP rule.
#
# The attack is illustrated below.
#
# Force the next block to have a timestamp in the future:
future = t + MAX_TIMEWARP + 1
# Witout violating the 2 hour in the future rule
assert_greater_than_or_equal(t + MAX_FUTURE_BLOCK_TIME, future)
node.setmocktime(future)
self.generate(self.wallet, 1, sync_fun=self.no_op)
assert_equal(node.getblock(node.getbestblockhash())['time'], t + MAX_FUTURE_BLOCK_TIME)
assert_equal(node.getblock(node.getbestblockhash())['time'], future)
self.log.info("First block template of retarget period can't use wall clock time")
self.nodes[0].setmocktime(t)
# The template will have an adjusted timestamp, which we then modify
node.setmocktime(t)
# The template will have an adjusted timestamp.
tmpl = node.getblocktemplate(NORMAL_GBT_REQUEST_PARAMS)
assert_greater_than_or_equal(tmpl['curtime'], t + MAX_FUTURE_BLOCK_TIME - MAX_TIMEWARP)
assert_equal(tmpl['curtime'], t + 1)
# mintime and curtime should match
assert_equal(tmpl['mintime'], tmpl['curtime'])
# Check that the adjusted timestamp results in a valid block
block = CBlock()
block.nVersion = tmpl["version"]
block.hashPrevBlock = int(tmpl["previousblockhash"], 16)
@ -163,18 +180,29 @@ class MiningTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
assert_template(node, block, None)
bad_block = copy.deepcopy(block)
# Use wall clock instead of the adjusted timestamp. This could happen
# by accident if pool software ignores mintime and curtime.
bad_block.nTime = t
bad_block.solve()
assert_raises_rpc_error(-25, 'time-timewarp-attack', lambda: node.submitheader(hexdata=CBlockHeader(bad_block).serialize().hex()))
self.log.info("Test timewarp protection boundary")
bad_block.nTime = t + MAX_FUTURE_BLOCK_TIME - MAX_TIMEWARP - 1
# It can also happen if the pool implements its own logic to adjust its
# timestamp to MTP + 1, but doesn't take the new timewarp rule into
# account (and ignores mintime).
mtp = node.getblock(node.getbestblockhash())["mediantime"] + 1
bad_block.nTime = mtp + 1
bad_block.solve()
assert_raises_rpc_error(-25, 'time-timewarp-attack', lambda: node.submitheader(hexdata=CBlockHeader(bad_block).serialize().hex()))
bad_block.nTime = t + MAX_FUTURE_BLOCK_TIME - MAX_TIMEWARP
self.log.info("Test timewarp protection boundary")
bad_block.nTime = future - MAX_TIMEWARP - 1
bad_block.solve()
node.submitheader(hexdata=CBlockHeader(bad_block).serialize().hex())
assert_raises_rpc_error(-25, 'time-timewarp-attack', lambda: node.submitheader(hexdata=CBlockHeader(bad_block).serialize().hex()))
good_block = copy.deepcopy(bad_block)
good_block.nTime = future - MAX_TIMEWARP
good_block.solve()
node.submitheader(hexdata=CBlockHeader(good_block).serialize().hex())
def test_pruning(self):
self.log.info("Test that submitblock stores previously pruned block")